Home>Articles>Local Media Hype Sacramento’s ‘100th Confirmed Coronavirus Death’

Local Media Hype Sacramento’s ‘100th Confirmed Coronavirus Death’

Officials erase signs of hope with claims of ‘incomplete data’

By Katy Grimes, August 7, 2020 3:44 pm

Dr. Mark Ghaly reports on the COVID-19 discrepancies on August 4, 2020. (Photo: Youtube)

Breathlessly reporting Sacramento’s 100th confirmed coronavirus death,” local radio and print media have jumped the shark.

Calling it “a grim milestone that comes as pandemic deaths continue to accumulate across California amid a surge in COVID-19 activity that’s continued since June,” nowhere in the article does anyone do math.

“California has seen an average of 121 deaths per day over the last two weeks, Newsom says. Still, there are reasons for hope,” the San Diego Union Tribune reported this week.

Sacramento County has a population of 1,567,490.

The City of Sacramento has approximately 550,000.

The most deaths in a day in Sacramento County has been 6. The average is much lower – like 2-3 per day (see data below).

Here is how the Bee reported the latest:

“California’s capital city has a population of roughly 500,000, meaning at least about one in every 5,000 residents has died of the novel coronavirus in the past five months.”

The City of Sacramento has lost 100 of its 550,000 residents to coronavirus, and that is assuming a lot given how many deaths have been coded COVID-19 for the inflated Medicare and Medi-Cal reimbursements.

California Globe looked at the Sacramento County data, noting they want people to focus on “cases” – those testing positive for coronavirus – rather than deaths.

Sacramento County, with 1,567,409 residents, has had 155 deaths. They report 10,544 residents testing positive, and buried in the data, they show 8,000 “likely recovered.”

Of the 250 “hospitalized cases,” only 81 are in the ICU. The data line for those in the ICU is almost flat from the beginning of April through August 6.

Sacramento County COVID data. (Photo: sac-epidemiology.maps.arcgis.com)

The boundary map of the City of Sacramento is a piece of work as the City has annexed several large areas over the years.

City of Sacramento boundaries. (Photo: cityofsacramento.org)

While the County of Sacramento, which is much larger, is this:

Sacramento County COVID data. (Photo: sac-epidemiology.maps.arcgis.com)

Again, the City of Sacramento has approximately 550,000 residents, while Sacramento County has 1.5+ million.

Notably, immediately following Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press conference Monday where he reported some good news – that the average weekly number of positive tests was down by about 21% – reports of “incomplete data” were all over the news.

Following the governor’s Monday press conference of good news, Tuesday had the grim reaper, public health agency director Dr. Mark Ghaly, reporting the bad news that incomplete data was why cases were reported down.

It’s almost as if Gov. Newsom received a phone call warning him that the good news just could not be allowed.

Sacramento County COVID data. (Photo: sac-epidemiology.maps.arcgis.com)

Remember, as California Globe recently reported, Stanford’s Dr. Scott Atlas said that there’s been too heavy of a focus on an uptick in cases, “especially in places where governors either have reinstated or have further enforced restrictions. When we see this focus on more cases, it doesn’t really matter how many cases — it only matters who gets the cases (see graph below). We know that the infection-fatality rate for people under 70 is 0.04 percent — that’s less than or equal to the seasonal flu,” he said.

Sacramento County deaths by age group.

Notice in the graph that the first age group is 0-49, and then each subsequent age group is broken down by 10 years. Not only does the 0-49 age group have the fewest deaths (12), it is very likely those deaths are also in the 40-49 range. But the county does not provide the data.

Another Stanford doctor, Dr. Michael Levitt announced two weeks ago that US COVID-19 will be done in 4 weeks. Levitt said the U.S. saturates at no more than 170,000 deaths.

With good news like this, is it any wonder that “incomplete data” is now to blame for any of the uplifting news?

For perspective, as we like to remind readers, Victor Davis Hansen reported, “California loses about 270,000 lives to all causes every year — meaning, on any given day, around 740 Californians die.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:


5 thoughts on “Local Media Hype Sacramento’s ‘100th Confirmed Coronavirus Death’

  1. Great article about the contemptible, lying, Drama Queen COVID reporting. Can’t imagine anyone that hasn’t had their fill of it by now. We’re all sick of it and seething. I’d also be very surprised to hear that there is anyone left who is still in the dark about Gov Gav’s motives in all of this.
    Plus if I see one more Grim Reaper’s report (and weirdly, nearly every county in the state has one, a Grim Reaper, that is) or hear the phrase “grim milestone” one more time, it might be the last straw. Multiply me by several million and I think they have a lot more trouble than they think they have.

  2. Another good article Katy. Thank You. Since all this COVID has started which has been five months now, I do not know of one person who has got it, tested positive for it, or who knows someone who knows someone that has tested positive or has come down with it. I speak with about 250 to 300 clients every week on the phone because of my business. These clients are from Monterey, the Bay Area, Pleasanton, Livermore, and the Concord area. I speak to them about COVID and they tell me the same. I know of probably 10 people who got the seasonal flu and colds during the winter. I don’t doubt COVID is deadly but this has gone on too long and has been POLITICIZED more than anything. Remember in March it was “15 days to flatten the curve”. Remember that Grusom?

    1. This has all been a lie by Newsom. 40,000,000 Californians and not one kid has died nor transmitted it to a teacher… yet Newsom has schools on lock down. And yes it is him doing it , not local school districts. They do what their health departments tell them who in turn do what the state does , who in turn do what Newsom tells them. This policy of Newsom EOS worse than 10,000 sick elderly catching it and dying because they are old and sick

  3. The majority of deaths are the very elderly who no doubt have underlying health conditions? Protect the vulnerable and free the rest of us from Gov. Newsom’s tyranny and unconstitutional edicts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.