AB 1215 seeks to ban all biometric surveillance in police body cams.
What is it?
AB 1215 would install a three year ban on using biometrics, such as facial recognition systems, from being used in police body cameras. This would also ban using such technology in data recorded from a normal camera.
In matters of privacy, police can still blur in videos recorded.
The bill follows the lead of Oregon, San Francisco and several other cities and states that have banned biometric systems, as the technology has failed to match suspects and confused traits such as race and gender in several high profile cases.
Who Backed It?
Assemblyman Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) introduced AB 1215. Ting has cited concerns over biometric systems being used as surveillance instead of their intended usage in identifying to whom police are speaking.
“If you install software onto those body cameras, then you run the risk of really destroying that trust,”Assemblyman Ting said recently. “It becomes a tool of surveillance, which was never the goal.”
Ting is joined by groups such as the ACLU in supporting the bill. Those groups also say they back the bill because of surveillance fears.
“AB 1215 is a common-sense bill that rightly concludes that keeping our communities safe doesn’t have to come at the expense of our fundamental freedoms,” said the ACLU in a statement. “We should all be able to safely live our lives without being watched and targeted by the government.”
Law enforcement groups have opposed the ban, saying that the ban gets rid of a vital tool that helps identify suspects, with one group even saying that this could lead to a ban of body cameras altogether in California.
AB 1215 split both the Assembly and the Senate largely on party lines, with a few switched votes due to closeness of law enforcement organizations.
Governor Newsom is currently deciding whether to sign or veto the bill. Based on Newsom’s history of curbing what police can or cannot do both as mayor of San Francisco and his short time as Governor, he is widely expected to sign the bill.
California Peace Officers Association, California Police Chiefs Association, California State Sheriffs’ Association, CSAC Excess Insurance Authority, Los Angeles County Sheriff Peace Officers’ Association of California, Riverside Sheriffs’ Association
American Civil Liberties Union of California (source), AIDS Legal Referral Panel, Anti Police-Terror Project, API Chaya, Asian Law Alliance, California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, California Civil Liberties Advocacy, California Immigrant Policy Center, California Public Defenders Association, Center for Media Justice, Color of Change, Council on American-Islamic Relations of California, Data for Black Lives Defending Rights and Dissent, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Fight for the Future, Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club, Indivisible CA, Justice Teams Network, Library Freedom Project, Media Alliance, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Center for Lesbian Rights, Oakland Privacy, RAICES San Jose/Silicon Valley NAACP, Secure Justice ,Tor Project, Transgender Law Center, X-Lab.
- PG&E To Submit Application For Federal Funds to Keep the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant Operating Past 2025 - July 6, 2022
- LA DA Gascon Recall Supporters To Turn in Signatures to County Wednesday - July 6, 2022
- COVID-19 Fatigue: CA County Health Departments Push For More 17-Under Vaccinations with New Variant - July 6, 2022