X

Gov. Newsom Issues Mandatory Mask Order, Worn Inside and Outside

Practicing physicians say only those who are sick, or have underlying health concerns, should wear masks in public

Governor Gavin Newsom at 2019 California Democratic Party State Convention at the George R. Moscone Convention Center in San Francisco, June 1, 2019. (Photo: Gage Skidmore)

‘We usually recommend people who are ill wear surgical masks to prevent transmission [to others]… it may be kind of an awareness tool, but in terms of its direct benefits, there’s no data.’ Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, Professor of Medicine and Public Health at University of California, Los Angeles

 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom just announced his newest order mandating face masks be worn – indoors and outside. As his press release said, “Californians Must Wear Face Coverings When in Higher-Risk Situations, Especially Indoors.”

Wearing masks indoors in “any public space” will kill off the remaining gyms still in business.

Ironically, “Persons who are incarcerated in Prisons and jails,” are exempted from the order – because California is releasing more prisoners early to “stem the spread of the coronavirus” in the Golden State’s jails, California Globe reported Thursday.

Once again, while claiming that his decision is science-based, Newsom said nothing about the thousands of people who gathered closely together to riot on city streets in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento the past few weekends, leaving many to believe that this order is just another in a long line of control and lockdown measures leading up to the November 3, 2020 Election.

Newsom’s Twitter feed following his order is rich with angry Californians who see hypocrisy and control behind the order, and not science.

and perhaps the most poignant:

 

“Science shows that face coverings and masks work,” said Governor Gavin Newsom. “They are critical to keeping those who are around you safe, keeping businesses open and restarting our economy.”

But there is just too much evidence and actual science, saying otherwise. Public Health bureaucrats who work for Newsom and counties, agree with the mask-wearing order; many practicing physicians say only those who are sick, or have underlying health concerns, should wear masks in public. And now, reports of people with bacterial skin infections and lung infections are making the rounds, due to extended mask wearing.

Dr. Brosseau is a national expert on respiratory protection and infectious diseases and professor (retired), University of Illinois at Chicago, and Dr. Sietsema, also an expert on respiratory protection and an assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, found that data is lacking to recommend broad mask use:

“We do not recommend requiring the general public who do not have symptoms of COVID-19-like illness to routinely wear cloth or surgical masks because:

    • There is no scientific evidence they are effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission
    • Their use may result in those wearing the masks to relax other distancing efforts because they have a sense of protection
    • We need to preserve the supply of surgical masks for at-risk healthcare workers.

“Sweeping mask recommendations—as many have proposed—will not reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, as evidenced by the widespread practice of wearing such masks in Hubei province, China, before and during its mass COVID-19 transmission experience earlier this year. Our review of relevant studies indicates that cloth masks will be ineffective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as PPE.”

“I don’t think there’s any evidence that wearing a surgical mask has any benefit to protect someone in general from exposure, or from being infected,” Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, Professor of Medicine and Public Health at University of California, Los Angeles said. “We usually recommend people who are ill wear surgical masks to prevent transmission [to others]… it may be kind of an awareness tool, but in terms of its direct benefits, there’s no data,” Dr. Klausner added.

Here is Newsom’s word salad press release on mandatory mask wearing in sunny and warm California where the infection, hospitalization and mortality rate is comparatively low:

“Simply put, we are seeing too many people with faces uncovered – putting at risk the real progress we have made in fighting the disease. California’s strategy to restart the economy and get people back to work will only be successful if people act safely and follow health recommendations. That means wearing a face covering, washing your hands and practicing physical distancing,” Gov. Newsom said.

“As Californians venture into our communities more, wearing face coverings is another important way we can help protect one another,” said Dr. Sonia Angell, State Public Health Officer and Director of the California Department of Public Health. “Combined with physical distancing and frequent hand washing, wearing cloth face coverings when we are with others outside of our household will reduce the spread of COVID-19, which is still a very real threat across our state.”

Today’s guidance mandates the use of cloth face coverings by the general public statewide when outside the home, with limited exceptions.

Californians must wear face coverings when they are in the situations listed below:

    • Inside of, or in line to enter, any indoor public space;
    • Obtaining services from the healthcare sector in settings including, but not limited to, a hospital, pharmacy, medical clinic, laboratory, physician or dental office, veterinary clinic, or blood bank;
    • Waiting for or riding on public transportation or paratransit or while in a taxi, private car service, or ride-sharing vehicle;
    • Engaged in work, whether at the workplace or performing work off-site, when:
      • Interacting in-person with any member of the public;
      • Working in any space visited by members of the public, regardless of whether anyone from the public is present at the time;
      • Working in any space where food is prepared or packaged for sale or distribution to others;
      • Working in or walking through common areas, such as hallways, stairways, elevators, and parking facilities;
      • In any room or enclosed area where other people (except for members of the person’s own household or residence) are present when unable to physically distance.
    • Driving or operating any public transportation or paratransit vehicle, taxi, or private car service or ride-sharing vehicle when passengers are present. When no passengers are present, face coverings are strongly recommended.
    • While outdoors in public spaces when maintaining a physical distance of six feet from persons who are not members of the same household or residence is not feasible.

The following individuals are exempt from wearing a face covering:

    • Children aged two and under;
    • Persons with a medical, mental health, or developmental disability that prevents wearing a face covering;
    • Persons who are hearing impaired, or communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication;
    • Persons for whom wearing a face covering would create a risk to the person related to their work, as determined by local, state, or federal regulators or workplace safety guidelines.
    • Persons who are obtaining a service involving the nose or face for which temporary removal of the face covering is necessary to perform the service;
    • Persons who are seated at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service, while they are eating or drinking, provided that they are able to maintain a distance of at least six feet away from persons who are not members of the same household or residence;
    • Persons who are engaged in outdoor work or recreation such as swimming, walking, hiking, bicycling, or running, when alone or with household members, and when they are able to maintain a distance of at least six feet from others;
    • Persons who are incarcerated. Prisons and jails, as part of their mitigation plans, will have specific guidance on the wearing of face coverings of masks for both inmates and staff.

More information about the state’s COVID-19 guidance is on the California Department of Public Health’s Guidance web page.

Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

Katy Grimes: Katy Grimes, the Editor in Chief of the California Globe, is a long-time Investigative Journalist covering the California State Capitol, and the co-author of California's War Against Donald Trump: Who Wins? Who Loses?

View Comments (33)

  • So if I suddenly get the urge to beat someone because I am wearing a mask that I have been forced to wear, does that count as a mental health disability? Or wait.. I know! I will just claim to be perpetually protesting. I can see it now. Just get a shirt that holds up any of the current progressive hot button issues that you're supporting and claim that you're spreading your "wokeness" while protesting!

    • If a 'mental health disability' exempts a person from wearing a mask then no one who votes Democrat will ave to wear one.

  • Gov. Newsom and his Democrat cronies mandating masks is like Muslim clerics mandating hijabs for women under Sharia Law. It's absolutely ridiculous. Gov. Newsom needs to be recalled ASAP.

    • The lock downs and mandates have now been shown to be unconstitutional, and there us a stay on the Newsom so he can't dictate rules anymore with out going through the legislators, as the Cal-Constitution said's, for the REST of his term :) So being lock downs and mask wearings are found unconstitutional, you don't need to wear them.

  • Yep, nothing like a mask to represent FAKE SCIENCE!
    Now I will take a deep cleansing breath....
    ....in with the good air, out with the bad air

    • I can't believe people are still debating masks. No one likes them, but no one likes to be intubated either.
      Reducing the amount of virus containing aerosol works to mitigate disease propagation. Would the same people sharing misinformation that "masks don't work" prefer their surgeon not to wear one? Even if you dismiss science, can you dismiss common sense and observation? South Korea has had less than 300 COVID-19 deaths. What are they doing differently? Apparently their general population had the brains to social distance, wear masks, test, and trace without being forced to do it.

      "Coronavirus disease is predominantly transmitted by contact or droplet transmission."
      "Appropriate use of PPE significantly reduces the risk of viral transmission and infection."
      https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/anae.15071

      • As far as debate:
        For one, it is not a proven concept that it stops transmission of virus droplets, especially homemade cloth masks that most people wear in public. OSHA has given guidance to businesses that explain how effective each type of mask is and what it is designed for. Masks need to be worn properly to be the most effective.

        The medical professionals are also in disagreement when it comes to surgical use. Please be aware of this study,
        https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11869644/
        Surgical rooms are required to be sterile to prevent wound infection which is a much different situation and the medical profession is still debating this.

        Many immunologists believe the best practice is 6ft social distancing and hand washing and eliminate touching your face.
        I see plenty of people including children not wearing the cloth mask correctly and constantly touching their faces. Defeats the purpose of coming in contact with germs.
        Historically masks are for the sick to wear, not the healthy.
        Here is another article with good references:
        https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/the-miserable-pseudo-science-behind-face-masks-social-distancing-and-contact-tracing/

        As far as South Korea, it was not solely mask wearing. I have read that credit can be given to EARLY contact tracing and closing inbound travel..

        I think the main issue for people is the political mandate. If you are sick or afraid by all means wear the mask.

        Be well.

  • There must be some loophole.
    If you claim a medical condition, do you have to disclose what it is?
    I would guess that HIPPA might preclude that.
    In which case, what are they going to do...Especially if everyone claims a "medical".
    Just a thought.

  • The recall petitions for Gavin Newsom are ready to be downloaded. Go to recallgavin2020.com Download the petitions, print them, get registered voters to sign them in your county, and let's get this PUNK out of the Governor's Mansion! Enough of his $@%&!

  • Regardless of what they claim, the actual research does not support the claim that mask usage by the general public reduces the infection rate. When pressed to reference actual research mask proponents fall back on expert opinions or studies that don't measure actual infection rates, but instead measure how far a cough goes with/without a mask. That's a fun 5th grade science project, but the question is far more complex: INFECTION RATES. I wrote an article that has links to the actual research. Please arm yourself with facts everyone so you can make the most logical and factual argument.
    https://californiaglobe.com/fr/why-im-not-wearing-a-mask/

  • So all of a sudden everyone must wear a mask indoors and outdoors. However, BLM and Antifa are not required to wear mask while protesting, rioting , looting and committing arson. This appears to show a lack of concern for black lives and only using them for chaos and votes not caring about their help and welfare.

  • Sorry, Newsom. none of us is listening to you or Garcetti anymore. You allowed rioting and looting and follow junk science, so you can stick your face masks.

Related Post

This website uses cookies.