Home>Articles>Legislator Misclassification: The Key to AB 5

Gov. Gavin Newsom signs AB 5 surrounded by labor reps, and Asm. Lorena Gonzalez. (Photo: Twitter)

Legislator Misclassification: The Key to AB 5

Lawmakers versus the people, a turning point for California

By Lloyd Billingsley, February 28, 2020 7:48 am

According to its defenders, Assembly Bill 5 addresses “worker misclassification.” As recent developments confirm, the measure is really a matter of legislator misclassification.

Legislators purport to represent the people and uphold their rights under the U.S. and California constitutions. AB 5 runs roughshod over the rights of the people and seeks to serve the interests of unions, which do not represent the people. And contrary to popular belief, unions do not represent “labor.”

According to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, unions represent only 14.7 percent of California’s wage and salaried workers. A full 85.3 percent of California workers, the vast majority, are not union members. AB 5, written by the AFL-CIO, aims to force workers into unions and thus clearly aims to benefit a special interest.  The measure is also a watershed moment in other ways.

AB 5 is the first California law specifically to target independent workers such as freelance writers, a small and vulnerable segment of the population, and limit their ability to make a living. Never before has a California law restricted any independent worker or contractor to 35 transactions a year.

As the damage assessments roll in from multiple professions, AB 5 supporters resist all attempt to put a hold on the measure. As California Globe notes, on Thursday the legislature rejected a motion by Assemblyman Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin) to suspend AB 5 while corrective legislation is under consideration. For those already harmed by AB 5, this should confirm its hostile intent.

AB 5 targets the so-called “gig economy,” which amounts to the free market, and limits workers’ rights to free and voluntary association. The attempt to make freelancers conventional employees comes at a time when newspaper chains such as McClatchy are bankrupt and shedding full-time staffers.

AB 5 thus amounts to an infringement of writers’ First Amendment rights and an attack on the independent websites who publish their work.

Lorena Gonzalez, an attorney and former AFL-CIO union organizer, is not competent or qualified to judge the professions, rates of pay and working conditions Californians choose for themselves. AB 5 is a deliberate assault on individual choice, voluntary exchange, and the free market.

Supporters of AB 5 have abandoned the conventional role of legislators and become straw bosses of the unions who demonstrate outside the state capitol shouting “this is our house!”  The people do not vote for union bosses, who represent less than 15 percent of workers in the state of California.

By any standard, AB 5 is a repressive measure more suited to an authoritarian regime such as Venezuela than a constitutional republic. Legislators turn a blind eye to the harm, and to date federal judges such as Phillip Gutierrez and Dolly Gee have sided with pro-AB 5 legislators, in Dolly’s Gee’s case, on their intentions alone.

As Gee ruled, the court “cannot second guess the Legislature’s choice to enact a law that seeks to uplift the conditions of the majority of non-exempt low- income workers rather than preserve the status quo for the smaller subset of workers who enjoy independent contractor status.”

Spread the news:
RELATED ARTICLES
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles Governor Legislature National
Sort by

Sex and Taxes: Legislators’ Annual Preoccupation

‘Sex with minors’ and new taxes are seldom ‘voluntary’ in California
September 1, 2020 10:13 am

18

EDD Audit Hearing Cancelled by Democratic Legislators

Audit would looked for underlying problems of mass delays, unemployment benefit problems within the EDD
July 29, 2020 2:44 pm

18

California State Assembly in Session

California Governor and Legislators Suspend Procedures and Rules to Pass Emergency $500 M to $1 Billion Coronavirus Funding

CA Legislature authorized funding, then adjourned until April 13
March 17, 2020 11:04 am

18

6 thoughts on “Legislator Misclassification: The Key to AB 5

  1. This article is a garbage flame piece to insight ignorant rhetoric. Politically slanted. Probably funded by Uber/Lyft VC profiteers.

    1. Hi Roem, there are over150 professions not covered by the exemptions and we’re losing thousand of dollars a month. Usually by end of February, as a pro video editor of 40+ years, I would make $7-$20K or more. I’ve made only a thousand. I got my 1040ES from the IRS today and laughed rather bitterly at the fact that I’m sending in maybe a couple of hundred to the IRS and ZERO to California. Normally it would be $2000 to $3,000 or more. 2 years ago it was more, last year less. The way of the freelancer. Here’s the unintended consequences. About half a million to a million independent contractors are in the same situation. They’ve lost thousands of dollars just the past two months. The GDP loss so far is anywhere from 1 billion to $6 Billion. April’s 540ES collections will be down. A lot. Look me up in Twitter @Marcus Pun if you want to respond.

    2. Hi Roem. I’m a freelance musician and a lifelong Democrat who was brought into this fight because AB5 eliminates the ability of me and my friends to make money in our chosen profession. I can assure you that we are real and that there are hundreds of thousands of us across many industries, many of us lifelong Democrats who are extremely disappointed in the people we have been choosing to represent us.

    1. Ignorant rhetoric? Then you say “Probably funded by Uber/Lyft VC profiteers”. You should be more exact in your accusations, not just freelance drivers affected by AB 5. I don’t see any political slant. Musicians, Writers, and small businesses are also affected by AB 5.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *