Home>Articles>San Francisco’s Proposition C Loses Juul As Its Largest Supporter

Juul pulls support of Proposition C. (WVrecord)
Articles Highlight Legislature National San Francisco

San Francisco’s Proposition C Loses Juul As Its Largest Supporter

Juul ends all financial support of the San Francisco vote to overturn the vaping ban in the city.

By Evan Symon, October 1, 2019 1:28 pm

Juul Labs, the largest e-cigarette and vaping company in the country that controls over 70% of the U.S. market, has ended its $19 million dollar campaign in support of Proposition C, the ballot initiative to overturn San Francisco’s vaping ban.

Recent polls have shown that Proposition C, despite Juul giving millions for ads and awareness, has failed to get traction in the city. With a little over a month left until election day, polls have indicated that San Francisco residents remain unsupportive and would still vote ‘no’ by a double digit margin.

Juul CEO K.C. Crosthwaite (Bizjournals)

“We must strive to work with regulators, policymakers and other stakeholders, and earn the trust of the societies in which we operate,” stated Juul CEO and former Altria executive K.C Crosthwaite. “That includes inviting an open dialogue, listening to others and being responsive to their concerns.” 

Despite Juul’s stance, the looming failure of the Proposition is a particular sting against them.

“Juul is based in San Francisco,” said Dr. Richard Nagy, a tobacco policy specialist. “It’s where they were created. It’s like if cigarettes were made illegal in Virginia or North Carolina, or if Coca-Cola was banned in Atlanta. It’s a huge blow, and knowing that well over half of the cities residents don’t want you or your product in town anymore, it has a huge demoralizing effect.”

Larry Tramutola, the campaign director for “No On Prop C,” also gave insight into how much Juul was giving despite imminent failure.

“The political reality is that Juul’s campaign already shattered spending records for a corporate-sponsored committee,” said Tramutola. “And that was 45 days before the election. Juul has outspent the “No on C” coalition by a ratio of 7.5-to-1. Juul’s ads are still on the air as of right now. And Juul has portrayed Prop C as a crackdown on e-cigarettes in San Francisco. When in fact it’s the exact opposite.” 

In addition to the giant campaign for Proposition C in San Francisco, Juul has been steadily increasing political contributions and lobbying spending in California.

The decision also comes in the wake of recent vaping restrictions in Michigan, Massachusetts, and Los Angeles, as well as attempts at stricter state legislation in AB 1639. An ongoing federal review of the health risks of vaping, spurred by a sudden rise of illnesses and deaths related to vaping, is also threatening sales nationwide.

“They’re in a desperation mode now,” said Dr. Nagy. “They gave up on San Francisco and they’re moving on to other cities, primarily in California. A lot of cities have similar bills coming up, and after the failure of this Proposition, and the limiting one in LA, they don’t want to lose any more of their home state.”

“But after losing San Francisco for sure, their headspace right now is that they’re a government in exile, and they’ll do whatever they can to get their home back again. But how can you get it back if the vast majority of people don’t want you there?”

After Juul’s pullout, it is widely believed that Proposition C will not pass in November.

Evan Symon

Evan V. Symon is the Senior Editor for the California Globe. Prior to the Globe, he reported for the Pasadena Independent, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, and was head of the Personal Experiences section at Cracked. He can be reached at evan@californiaglobe.com.
Evan Symon
Spread the news:
RELATED ARTICLES
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles Local San Francisco Legal Legislature Santa Barbara National Los Angeles
Sort by

How Many Laws Does San Francisco’s Prop. A Violate?

Six hundred million dollars for, at best, less than 1,000 units of new housing
October 21, 2019 2:10 am

18

California Parents’ Lawsuit to Block Racist, ‘Social Justice’ Agenda on Children Instruction in Santa Barbara Schools Moves Forward

‘The JCCC facilitator informed me that I need to come to terms with my whiteness’
October 21, 2019 2:03 am

18

Racehorse Deaths Continue At Santa Anita Park Despite New Laws Passed By The State Legislature

33 deaths have been recorded since December of 2018
October 10, 2019 7:10 am

18

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *