Home>Articles>Gov. Newsom Announces Refusal To Sign Bill to Ban Tackle Football For Under 12 Youth

Governor Gavin Newsom giving second inaugural address on January 6, 2023 (Photo: gov.ca.gov)

Gov. Newsom Announces Refusal To Sign Bill to Ban Tackle Football For Under 12 Youth

AB 734 received little support

By Evan Symon, January 17, 2024 2:30 am

Governor Gavin Newsom vowed on Tuesday to not sign into law a recent bill brought into the legislature that would ban tackle football for children under the age of 12 in the state, ending the progression of the bill less than week after it was first brought to the Assembly.

Assembly Bill 734, authored by Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (D-Sacramento), would prohibit youth sports organizations that conduct a tackle football program, or a youth tackle football league, from allowing a person younger than 12 years of age to be a youth tackle football participant through the organization or league. Should the bill pass, the law would begin to take effect beginning in January 2026.

Assemblyman McCarty wrote the bill last year because of increased concerns over youth football injuries, as well growing concerns with head injuries at a younger age. Specifically. McCarty cited several studies in support of his bill. These included a 2022 United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) study finding that chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is caused by repeated traumatic brain injuries, a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) pointing to higher head injuries amongst younger athletes, and a Boston University study confirming a link between CTE, suicide, and early in life head injuries caused by athletics.

While many health officials and early childhood development experts agreed with McCarty and supported the bill, many other pointed to flaws in the bill. Many youth sports officials worried that the ban would lead to players not being ready for when tackle football then begins and said that more injuries could occur as a result of not being ready. Others pointed out an overall lack of similar injuries amongst youth players as well as what the effects it would have on poorer and at-risk athletes who rely on football at a young age to keep active in a positive way.

With only limited support by lawmakers, much hope by supporters rested upon Governor Newsom giving his support and signature. However, those hopes were dashed on Tuesday. While Newsom did give concern on the issue of youth sports injuries and long term affects, he said that an outright ban was not the way to go.

In an interview first reported by Politico on Tuesday, Newsom said “I am deeply concerned about the health and safety of our young athletes, but an outright ban is not the answer. My administration will work with the Legislature and the bill’s author to strengthen safety in youth football — while ensuring parents have the freedom to decide which sports are most appropriate for their children.”

While Assemblyman McCarty did not give a statement on the Governor’s decision as of Tuesday night, opponents of the bill praised the Governor for refusing to sign the legislation.

“This was a common sense decision,” added Jamal Lawrence, a youth football coach in Los Angeles. “Any person worth their salt knows that sports like these are important. Safety can come through other ways. The person who thought this up just doesn’t understand any of this. They never saw games with the kids or talked to schools about how important sports are. Whoever wrote this needs to come down from their ivory tower and actually listen to people for a change.

“As for Newsom? I mean, he’s not the greatest, but I’ll tell you this. A coach I know out in Fresno. Big conservative, Trump guy. I talked to him before you about this, and he even gave Newsom props on this. That’s how much of a mistake this bill was.”

As of Tuesday night, it is unknown if AB 734 will still be attempted to move forward in the Assembly.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Evan Symon
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

10 thoughts on “Gov. Newsom Announces Refusal To Sign Bill to Ban Tackle Football For Under 12 Youth

  1. You can also find studies which show that soccer causes head injuries. But no move to “ban” youth soccer? How about banning horse jumping, skateboarding, bicycle and scooter riding, high diving, martial arts, etc.? And so many kids are saved by organized sports that t ache discipline, physical fitness, teamwork and setting goals.

    Glad my kids played sports and are adults.

  2. ……while ensuring parents have the freedom to decide which sports are most appropriate for their children.”

    Well then, Newsom. How about parents having the FREEDOM to decide what schools and what vaccines are most appropriate for their children??????

    1. You’re so right, Raymond, that would follow! Wouldn’t it! But Newsom is nothing is not inconsistent. Not to mention out for himself and his Prez ambitions, as far-fetched as they increasingly seem to be at the moment.

  3. Saying he would refuse to sign a bill is not the same as saying he would veto it. Unilke the Federal pocket veto, in California if the governor does not veto a bill, it becomes law with or without his signature.

  4. They drafted this football bill to give Mr. Newsom the opportunity to veto it so he looks manly and get the sports vote on his side.

    1. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that this bill was drafted to make Gruesome ‘look good’ so that he could come out of his rat hole and announce he would not sign it (and I’ll bet no one can name another sensible position or action from Gruesome before this), although likely the goal remains protecting his ever-diminishing shot at being the Dem Prez nominee by occasionally impersonating a sane person. Bonus points for the idea, which I’m sure is also true, that “he looks manly and gets the sports vote on his side.”
      That nothing is really at stake — no usual big donor groups in a snit because of it —- for him to take a position on this is probably also a factor.

  5. The Newsom Broken Clock was right…and its accuracy lasted about as long: trillionth of a nanosecond, maybe less.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *