District Attorney Brooke Jenkins, who was at odds with Lurie only a month ago, noted on Tuesday that the new budget plan was acceptable and showed a commitment to justice and public safety in the city.

“Mayor Lurie’s decision not to cut funding to our office is a testament to his commitment to prioritizing public safety and making sure that law enforcement agencies like ours have the staff and resources needed to get the job done,” explained Jenkins. “We have made tremendous strides over the last three years to make our city safer, and I look forward to continue making progress in partnership with Mayor Lurie and the San Francisco Police Department going forward.”

“As of right now public defender’s office not just ours but across the nation have been underfunded so we are playing catchup as it is so a 15% cut from our budget would be devastating,” added chief of staff for the public defender’s office Lyslynn Lacoste. “It would mean a backlog in the courts, it would mean more people not getting quality public defender services which everyone has the right to.”

Other lawmakers supported Mayor Lurie’s budgetary decisions, saying that public safety was one area they couldn’t fall back on, and that improved public safety would lead to improvements everywhere in time.

“We have to spend the money to fix the public safety challenges,” noted Supervisor Matt Dorsey. “Then I’m convinced we’ll see more conventions, more tourists, more commuters, and we’ll see the revenue grow. I know that’s not going to be easy in a very difficult budget year. But I think it’s essential.”

However, while many public safety departments are to be spared cuts, other departments aren’t so lucky, with the city needing to fill the gap by the end of the fiscal year. Mayor Lurie’s updated budget proposal is due by June 1st, with all other city departments expected to see significant drops in terms of funding.