Home>Articles>Gov. Newsom’s Dept. of Finance Opposed to Cost of College Health Clinics Expansion into Abortion Providers

Sen. Connie M. Leyva. (Kevin Sanders for California Globe)
Articles Governor Highlight Legislature

Gov. Newsom’s Dept. of Finance Opposed to Cost of College Health Clinics Expansion into Abortion Providers

Similar bill vetoed by Gov. Jerry Brown

By Katy Grimes, August 21, 2019 10:35 am

The Chief fiscal advisor to Gov. Gavin Newsom recently announced opposition to SB 24 by Sen. Connie Leyva (D-Chino), a bill which requires medical clinics located on campuses within the University of California or California State University to provide primary health care services to students, as well as abortion by medication techniques onsite.

The California Department of Finance announced its opposition to SB 24,  finding the “significant” costs likely generated by the measure too burdensome for students, universities, and taxpayers.

“While this bill and its sponsors indicate that private financing would cover all the costs associated with this bill, Finance notes this bill could create future General Fund cost pressures to the extent sufficient private funding cannot be raised to support readiness grants, the costs to comply with this bill’s requirements exceed the proposed grant funding, or to the extent the UC and CSU incur ongoing costs after January 1, 2023,” the Department of Finance reported.

SB 24 would require all UC and CSU student health centers to provide primary health care and medical abortions to students by January 2023.

The bill would also create a fund administered by the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls that will provide a $200,000 grant to each public university student health center for abortion readiness upgrades and to develop associated back-up medical supports.

While the DOF supported the intention to bring more health care and medical abortions onto UC and CSU campuses, it gave a scathing assessment of the Commission’s ability to provide and administer essential funding.

According to Leyva, SB 24 expands medication abortion services to student health centers on public university campuses. Currently, all student health centers offer some reproductive health services, and many offer comprehensive reproductive health services. Services at most SHCs include pregnancy testing/counseling, contraceptives, sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV counseling/testing, and cervical cancer screening/pap tests.

However, most campus student health centers have traditionally been little more than first aid clinics. The finance department noted that the ongoing funding required to turn all campus student health centers into primary care medical offices was cost-prohibitive.

SB 320 (Leyva of 2018) was substantially similar to this bill. SB 320 was vetoed by Governor Brown, who stated, in part: “Access to reproductive health services, including abortion, is a long-protected right in California. According to a study sponsored by supporters of this legislation, the average distance to abortion providers in campus communities varies from five to seven miles, not an unreasonable distance. Because the services required by this bill are widely available off-campus, this bill is not necessary.”

Spread the news:
RELATED ARTICLES
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles National Governor Legislature Local
Sort by

Governor Newsom Blames President Trump Over Homeless Funding Delay

The temporary stoppage of federal homeless counts halts $650 million for California
December 6, 2019 6:55 am

18

Gov. Newsom’s Climate Change Executive Order Looting Road Funds Short on Details, Long on ‘Social Investing’

‘The Governor is creating more greenhouse gas emissions with idling cars stuck in traffic’
December 5, 2019 2:15 am

18

Relations Between The Governors Office and Trade Unions Worsens

Broken promises and cancelled projects less than a year into Governor Newsom’s term
December 3, 2019 9:06 am

18

3 thoughts on “Gov. Newsom’s Dept. of Finance Opposed to Cost of College Health Clinics Expansion into Abortion Providers

  1. Well, that’s SOMETHING! Wish the opposition was because it’s a BAD IDEA, but apparently that’s too much to ask.
    Can’t believe I’m saying this but Jerry Brown often looks downright sensible compared to you-know-who.

  2. Talk about a misleading headline. The primary care cost is the reason for the opposition.

    Also, all full time UC students are required to purchase health insurance as it is, and the UC has a very affordable group plan that is very very beneficial to older graduate students.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *