Home>Articles>Lawsuit at Cal State Fullerton Leads to Calls for Strengthening Hazing Laws

California State University, Fullerton. (Aecom)

Lawsuit at Cal State Fullerton Leads to Calls for Strengthening Hazing Laws

CSU Fullerton and sorority are being sued for wrongful death and negligence.

By Evan Symon, November 29, 2019 8:10 pm

The parents of Bea Castro, a 19-year-old Cal State, Fulletron student who died from acute ethanol intoxication in March of 2018 during a hazing incident, are suing both the University and the Chi Sigma Phi sorority. The charges in the lawsuit are wrongful death and negligence.

The suit claims that Castro died because of hazing during an initiation to the sorority. The suit also claims that some of the drinking was directly on campus, showing CSU Fullerton’s possible negligence in the case.

The Castro lawsuit is leading some, including anti-hazing advocates, to create a tougher version of SB 1454, commonly known as Matt’s Law.

Former state Senator Tom Torlakson. (Twitter)

SB 1454, written by former state Senator Tom Torlakson (D-Antioch), was passed and signed into law in 2006 by then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. SB 1454 made hazing a felony in California, allowed non-students to be charged for hazing, and allowed fraternities and sororities to be charged despite not being affiliated with the school.

The law itself stemmed from the hazing related death of CSU Chico student Matt Carrington in 2005. Carrington suffered a seizure and heart failure after a water intoxication hazing practice caused by members of the Chi Tau fraternity. After trial that made national headlines, three of the four members were charged with felonies in late 2005. The seemingly light sentences caused a furor and caused Senator Torlakson to write the bill.

Much of Castro’s lawsuit, in particular the charges directly against the sorority, come directly from Matt’s Law.

However, some are saying that Castro’s case is not going far enough. Anti-hazing advocate Connie Matthews, who led protests during the Carrington-Chico trial in 2005 and helped bring the case to national attention, has plans to do the same during Castro’s trial.

“Laws against hazing don’t go far enough,” said Matthews. “Hazing causes death caused by group pressure and demeans and hurts so many more a year. There’s several a year (and according to The Economist, that rate is going up), and while it may not be like drunk driving or tobacco on total number of deaths, it is so much more preventable. And young adults get off scot-free or nearly scot-free for literally bullying kids to death. It has to end.”

Matthews has also said that there is already underway a letter-writing campaign to all state assemblymembers and senators calling for a stronger bill.

Lawyers for CSU Fullerton are currently looking into the Castro suit.

Evan Symon
Spread the news:
RELATED ARTICLES
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles Governor Legal Local Sacramento
Sort by

Gov. Newsom Announces Salons and Barbers Can Re-Open, Day Before Court was to Rule on Lawsuit

‘Newsom must have known the handwriting was on the wall’
May 26, 2020 4:10 pm

18

Sacramento Developer’s Unprecedented Lawsuit Against City Council for Brown Act Violations is Published

Three California courts and a unanimous appellate court ruled that the Sacto Council violated the Constitutional
May 11, 2020 2:02 am

18

#RuinedByNewsom: Lawsuit Against CA Gov. Gavin Newsom For Ruining ‘Life Defining Moments’ of Californians

Cancelled weddings, graduations, surgeries, ‘ruined’ by California governor’s order to lockdown at home
May 8, 2020 3:34 pm

18

2 thoughts on “Lawsuit at Cal State Fullerton Leads to Calls for Strengthening Hazing Laws

  1. Who is Connie Matthews? I was at the Carrington pre-trial motions it never went to trial, as the defendants plead guilty, and there were no protesters, ever. There were a couple reporters, mostly from Chico local papers. I do not remember anyone besides Debbie Smith giving interviews or bringing national attention. I didn’t miss a court date. It was heartbreaking and frustrating. If Ms. Matthews was instrumental, I just really want to know exactly what she did and what her affiliation is with any anti-hazing groups. I was also at each Capitol hearing, and wrote and delivered letters to the state assembly, for SB 1454. I didn’t miss a vote, or a hearing. I also have copies of the law in each version as the assembly struck down parts they refused to even deliberate on (military). We met many people, but I do not remember this person. I could be wrong, but I really need a reminder. If she was indeed instrumental, I’d like to thank her. Can I get her credentials? Contact information? Anything that will explain who she is?
    Thanks in advance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *