CA Governor Gavin Newsom (Screenshot)
California Gets 81.4% of All Federal Funding for Illegal Immigrants
And one-third of California’s state budget is made up of federal funding
By Katy Grimes, June 11, 2026 9:51 am
A new federal report released Wednesday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Administration for Children and Families reveals that California gets 80% of the federal funding for Illegal Immigrant Families.
More than $617 million in taxpayer-funded cash welfare went to California households headed by illegal immigrant parents last year.
In 2024, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families basic assistance was provided to more than 85,000 child-only households headed by a parent excluded from the assistance unit because of immigration status, and California was the primary driver of the national total, accounting for about 59,600 households and about $617.5 million, or roughly 81% of nationwide spending on these cases.
Here is what the report says about California:
California as the Primary Driver
The issue is national in scope, but California is the primary driver of the national totals. In FY2024, California accounted for about 59,622 affected households, or roughly 70% of the national total. The state’s annual cash assistance associated with those households reached about $617.5 million, or about 81% of nationwide spending on these cases. At the adult level, California accounted for about 76,428 of the 106,148 excluded non-recipient parents identified through the immigration-status work-eligibility indicator, or about 72%.
California also devoted a substantial share of its Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) basic assistance spending to these cases. Spending on child-only cases involving immigration-status-ineligible parents equaled about 15.8% of all FY2024 TANF basic assistance spending in California. That concentration was accompanied by a sharp rise in benefit levels over time, as the average monthly benefit in California for child-only households with immigration-status-ineligible parents increased from an estimated $408 in FY2013 to $875 in FY2024, a rise of 114.5%. No other state approached California’s combination of scale, concentration, and fiscal impact.
The next-largest states were significantly smaller. New York ranked second at about 7,635 households and about $47.5 million in annual cash assistance, followed by Massachusetts at about 3,777 households and about $27.3 million, and Washington at about 1,796 households and about $12.2 million.
Why Gavin Newsom is Losing His Mind over Federal Funding Cuts
According to the California and Budget Policy Center, almost 4 in 5 federal dollars that are projected to flow through California’s state budget in 2025-26 — $136.6 billion — support vital health and human services (HHS) for millions of Californians, including children, seniors, and families with low incomes.
And one-third of California’s state budget is made up of federal funding. The enacted state budget for 2025-26 includes almost $175 billion in federal funds. This is over one-third (35.2%) of the total state budget.
And almost 4 in 5 federal dollars that are projected to flow through California’s state budget in 2025-26 — $136.6 billion — support vital health and human services (HHS) for millions of Californians, including children, seniors, and families with low incomes.
“Administration for Children and Families data show that child-only cases involving a parent excluded because of immigration status represent a substantial and longstanding use of welfare funding,” the Administration for Children and Families report found. “In FY2024 alone, roughly 85,000 such households received about $759 million in annual cash assistance, accounting for over 9% of all Temporary Assistance for Needy Families basic assistance spending nationwide.”
“Although the benefit is formally paid on behalf of the child, it still supports a household that includes an immigration-status-ineligible parent,” the report reveals.
“TANF’s child-only case structure channels substantial taxpayer-funded cash assistance into households headed by parents who are barred from receiving TANF because of immigration status, including illegal aliens.”
FY2024 Benefits to TANF Households with Non-Recipient Parents Due to Citizenship/Immigration Status
| STATE | HOUSEHOLDS | ANNUAL CASH ASSISTANCE (MILLIONS) | STATE SHARE OF BASIC ASSISTANCE EXPENDITURES | U.S. SHARE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA | 59,622 | $617.55 | 15.8% | 81.4% | |
| NEW YORK | 7,635 | $47.52 | 3.2% | 6.3% | |
| MASSACHUSETTS | 3,777 | $27.33 | 7.7% | 3.6% | |
| WASHINGTON | 1,796 | $12.22 | 5.5% | 1.6% | |
| TEXAS | 1,442 | $3.48 | 17.6% | 0.5% | |
| OHIO | 1,402 | $7.98 | 3.6% | 1.1% | |
| MINNESOTA | 1,028 | $7.01 | 5.5% | 0.9% | |
| FLORIDA | 966 | $1.83 | 1.2% | 0.2% | |
| ILLINOIS | 877 | $4.48 | 7.8% | 0.6% | |
| NEW MEXICO | 793 | $4.19 | 8.5% | 0.6% | |
| NEVADA | 648 | $2.40 | 9.7% | 0.3% | |
| NEBRASKA | 576 | $3.21 | 16.9% | 0.4% | |
| PENNSYLVANIA | 573 | $1.80 | 2.0% | 0.2% | |
| NEW JERSEY | 492 | $2.32 | 2.3% | 0.3% | |
| COLORADO | 461 | $1.75 | 2.5% | 0.2% | |
| INDIANA | 395 | $1.18 | 6.0% | 0.2% | |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | 353 | $2.21 | 4.3% | 0.3% | |
| RHODE ISLAND | 311 | $1.90 | 6.6% | 0.2% | |
| VIRGINIA | 236 | $1.17 | 1.7% | 0.2% | |
| KANSAS | 217 | $0.61 | 6.2% | 0.1% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | 206 | $0.52 | 3.1% | 0.1% | |
| MISSOURI | 183 | $0.54 | 3.7% | 0.1% | |
| MICHIGAN | 171 | $0.86 | 0.8% | 0.1% | |
| IOWA | 139 | $0.51 | 3.2% | 0.1% | |
| CONNECTICUT | 136 | $0.89 | 2.1% | 0.1% | |
| TENNESSEE | 120 | $0.45 | 0.7% | 0.1% | |
| KENTUCKY | 115 | $0.57 | 0.7% | 0.1% | |
| DELAWARE | 92 | $0.28 | 4.8% | 0.0% | |
| ALABAMA | 67 | $0.40 | 1.3% | 0.1% | |
| UTAH | 62 | $0.37 | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| GEORGIA | 62 | $0.16 | 0.2% | 0.0% | |
| ARIZONA | 48 | $0.12 | 0.3% | 0.0% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | 43 | $0.14 | 0.4% | 0.0% | |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE | 29 | $0.34 | 1.2% | 0.0% | |
| MAINE | 21 | $0.07 | 0.1% | 0.0% | |
| HAWAII | 9 | $0.05 | 0.2% | 0.0% | |
| VERMONT | 8 | $0.04 | 0.3% | 0.0% | |
| ALASKA | 7 | $0.04 | 0.2% | 0.0% | |
| SOUTH DAKOTA | 6 | $0.04 | 0.3% | 0.0% | |
| OREGON | 5 | $0.02 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| NORTH DAKOTA | 3 | $0.02 | 0.3% | 0.0% | |
| IDAHO | 1 | $0.00 | 0.1% | 0.0% | |
| MONTANA | 1 | $0.01 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| ARKANSAS | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| LOUISIANA | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| MARYLAND | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| OKLAHOMA | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| WEST VIRGINIA | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| WISCONSIN | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| WYOMING | 0 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Is this more California fraud that needs Trump administration scrutiny and prosecution?
free us and stop it
I’ll guarantee the illegals only see more than a pittance of that money. Stop the money and free us Californians.