Abortion Sanctuary State: Gov. Newsom Vows to ‘Fight Like Hell’ After Leaked Roe v. Wade Decision
California is promoting ‘abortion tourism’
By Katy Grimes, May 3, 2022 7:15 am
“The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court,” Politico reported Monday.
The leaked U.S. Supreme Court draft decision is momentous for several reasons, and may be a first in Supreme Court history as no draft decision in the modern history of the court has been leaked while a case was still pending. Attorneys and former Supreme Court clerks are calling for a full investigation into the stunning leak.
But the reaction to the impending decision was mass hysteria by abortion proponents and activists.
Almost immediately, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a father of four, jumped on the band wagon: “Our daughters, sisters, mothers, and grandmothers will not be silenced,” Newsom tweeted. The world is about to hear their fury. California will not sit back. We are going to fight like hell.”
Our daughters, sisters, mothers, and grandmothers will not be silenced.
The world is about to hear their fury.
California will not sit back. We are going to fight like hell. https://t.co/EhwSWXiZhx
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) May 3, 2022
By kicking the abortion issue down to the states, daughters, sisters, mothers, and grandmothers will hardly be silenced, especially in California and other blue states.
The Governor who shut down California’s beaches and legendary tourist attractions, churches, bars and restaurants as a response to the COVID pandemic, is now promoting abortion tourism, inviting tourists to visit California and get an abortion if their own state has abortion restrictions, the Globe reported in March.
Gov. Gavin Newsom and the State Legislature are offering taxpayer funds to help out-of-state residents obtain abortions, as well as legalizing infanticide through recently amended legislation.
Given California’s burgeoning new industry, shouldn’t Gov. Newsom be happy with the Supreme Court since there will be no federal restrictions on abortion?
If the Supreme Court does overturn Roe v. Wade and send it back to states to individually decide, Newsom is likely to sign Senate Bill 1142 by Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) and Sen. Anna Caballero (D-Merced), to establish the “Abortion Practical Support Fund,” which would require the Commission on the Status of Women and Girls to administer the fund to provide grants to assist low income pregnant women or others who “face other financial barriers with access to abortions in California.
The goal of the California Future of Abortion Council is to make California a “Reproductive Freedom State,” but more accurately, an Abortion Sanctuary State.
Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) described her bill as providing “philanthropic dollars for abortion services for low-income Californians and for out-of-state residents.” Skinner refers to abortion services as “reproductive care.”
California Senate President pro Tempore Toni G. Atkins (D-San Diego), Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon (D-Lakewood) and Governor Gavin Newsom released a joint statement:
“California will not stand idly by as women across America are stripped of their rights and the progress so many have fought for gets erased. We will fight. California is proposing an amendment to enshrine the right to choose in our state constitution so that there is no doubt as to the right to abortion in this state. We know we can’t trust the Supreme Court to protect reproductive rights, so California will build a firewall around this right in our state constitution. Women will remain protected here.”
It’s interesting that Atkins, Rendon and Newsom call abortion a “right,” when that is the crux of the legal issue, according to Alito’s draft decision.
“Roe v. Wade, the radical decision that took the abortion debate away from the American people, has myriad legal, scientific, and constitutional critics. Even abortion supporters complained about its weaknesses, as Alito mentions in his draft opinion,” the Federalist reported. “‘[W]ielding nothing but ‘raw judicial power,’ the Court usurped the power to address a question of profound moral and social importance that the Constitution unequivocally leaves for the people,’ Alito wrote in the draft opinion.”
The alleged leak of the opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is nothing short of breathtaking. It would constitute one of the greatest breaches of security in the history of the Court.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) May 3, 2022
- California Legislative Law and Process Book Published - December 24, 2024
- The True Cost of the 12 Gifts of Christmas: $49,263.47! - December 24, 2024
- Governor Gavin Newsom: Coulda, Woulda Shoulda - December 23, 2024
Well, he’s one “Catholic” that has sold his soul to be a governor. Isn’t is off that all the people that are for abortion are born and living their lives? Sad.
I honestly think this is part of the take down of the church. As I write this, two groups stand outside of the Supreme Court in a stand off., The Students for Life vs Catholics for Abortion.
Let that sit for awhile. This is a planned attack. It is cruel and evil. Jesus gave life died on the cross to give us everlasting life. Hard to believe Catholics are holding signs that they support the killing of babies!!????????
BTW, I am a baptized Catholic who has become very disillusioned with the church’s role in the world. In the end Newsom will have to answer for his crimes to the most high.
well, those “Catholics” for abortion aren’t practicing Catholics. The devil has always been trying to take down the Church for 2022 years. He has always ruined the family and knows that since he and other angels can’t create life, like the greatest gift women give the world. Sadly, the family is being destroyed by the “enlightened progressives”
Agree Michael, sad indeed.
Whoever leaked this document should receive punishment similar to Bradley Manning who got a 35-year sentence for leaking classified material to Wikileaks. This was a calculated Democrat move similar to what was done in the Kavanaugh hearings with Blasey Ford, allegedly by someone in Anna Eshoo’s offices, to undermine the judicial process and motivate the far left base for the midterms. It gets their media to shift the focus from Biden’s poll numbers that are in the tank and heading toward the sewer.
To all these politicians who claim to support women by protecting their right to take another life, I have a question. Where in the constitution does it say, a woman has the right to take the life of a pre born infant? Does it say we have a right to Death, Liberty and the pursuit to happiness?
Roe vs Wade should have never been a Supreme Court issue in the first place.
Please call write to your representatives in Sacramento to vote down AB 2223 and SB 1142
Raymond is right on the money. “calculated move by the dems”
The right to choose is a liberty guaranteed by the Constitution.
Forcing me to subsidize abortions is not in the Constitution.
Roberts turning this back to the states further divides our United States of America.
God, please help us!
“Given California’s burgeoning new industry, shouldn’t Gov. Newsom be happy with the Supreme Court since there will be no federal restrictions on abortion?”
Apparently Newsom IS happy about the opportunity to bring even more death to the State of California and at the same time act hysterical from his phony soapbox about the so-called threat of removing a “right,” all in hopes of retaining his ill-gotten power. After all, you don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out that Newsom has never given a rip about the rights of Californians. Go ahead, name ONE TIME. Now all of a sudden he is apoplectic, on behalf of women, about this fake “right?”
Never mind, as Katy Grimes noted, the Gov and our Dem Legislature have crowded the docket with abortion bills. All are over-the-top. They don’t care how it looks anymore; they’re not hiding it. Maybe they can’t even see anymore how brutal and murderous they have become. They’re going for broke! Will that chutzpah finally be their downfall? We can only hope.
In addition to AB 2223, Buffy Wicks’ ‘decriminalizing infanticide’ bill, below are still in legislative process.
I wrote to my state reps opposing these (and others) this past weekend. Then I had to take a shower. A long one.
SB 1142 – Abortion Practical Support Fund – provides taxpayer funds for lodging, airfare, for out-of-staters to get abortions in CA
SB 1375 – Allows nurse practitioners to perform abortions without a physician
AB 1918 – CA Reproductive Health Services Corps – will recruit, train, and retain to perform abortions, especially to “underserved” areas
‘2000 Mules’ Dinesh D’Sousa’s film on ballot harvesting was released yesterday; ‘Rigged’ Zuck Buck’s election fraud… This is their distraction for election crimes committed. If Newsom and his ilk gave a care about “Reproductive rights’ they would not have attacked David Daleiden, instead revealing the truth of abortion industry, prior to consent. California’s population has again been reduced by another 100k (departures, death, low birth rate). Newsom’s trying to say he saved lives thru Covid, but isn’t saying the lives he destroyed.
Norma McCorvey “Jane Roe, Roe vs Wade” gave her life to Jesus Christ… Shelley Lynn Thornton, the Roe baby was born. Think they’ll talk about that?
Did he say he is fighting for Hell? Those on the side of satan are going to get their just rewards if they do not straighten up now. I think Newsom has made his choice but he will not like the consequences.
Here is Kevin Kiley’s opinion on Newsom’s behavior, which we can pretty much agree on:
“Newsom’s delusional White House dreams are no secret. He basically used COVID as a campaign launch, believing if he could out-lockdown, out-mandate, and out-virtue-signal other blue state governors, that was his ticket to national glory. We saw the same playbook yesterday in response to the leaked Supreme Court opinion. Even though it would have literally no impact on California, Newsom wildly vowed to “fight like hell,” outdoing the histrionics of other politicians. For a time, it looked like Kamala Harris had boxed him out of the 2024 sweepstakes. But her absolute collapse on the national stage has opened the door – and Newsom is galloping through it in the most ungainly of fashions.”
He’s gonna “fight like hell”to kill babies in the womb and if that fails he will kill children with a poison jab. He is truly a special kind of evil.
I am in complete wonderment that a father of small children can so easily ordain death upon the unborn and born.
But he is totally opposed to capital punishment because he says it is immoral and oh yes rrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaccccist!
It’s amazing how fast those protestors got to the Supreme Court last night with all their pre printed signs! Somebody’s print shop was real busy and you know damn well it was before 9 pm ET before the story was leaked.
Yep, had the same thoughts!
This must be corrected! How can the Great and Powerful Newsom release this hurtful violence. Here, let me fix it:
California, A LAND STOLEN FROM THE INDIGINOUS PEOPLES will not stand idly by as UTERUS POSSESSING BIRTHING PERSONS across WHITE-SUPREMACY America are stripped of their rights and the progress so many have fought for gets erased. We will fight. California, A LAND STOLEN FROM THE INDIGINOUS PEOPLES, is proposing an amendment to enshrine the right to choose REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE (NOT VACCINE REFUSAL) in our NON-ANTI RACIST state A LAND STOLEN FROM THE INDIGINOUS PEOPLES constitution so that there is no doubt as to the right to REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE in this state STOLEN FROM THE INDIGINOUS PEOPLES. We know we can’t trust the FASCIST RIGHT WING TRUMPIAN Supreme Court to protect reproductive HEALTH CARE, so California will build a firewall around this right in our NON-ANTI RACIST state A LAND STOLEN FROM THE INDIGINOUS PEOPLES constitution. UTERUS POSSESSING BIRTHING PERSONS will remain protected here.”
Nice job HarvardR. I bet you can recite that in your sleep. Living in Cali will do that to you.
These laws do not go far enough….outlaw miscarriages as well !
We all know that these baby killers will just start calling an abortion a miscarriage !
My great grandmother would beat the rugs to induce one , that surely made her evil.
Women have controlled their ability to carry out a pregnancy since long before Jesus walked this earth, but not always with safety or with surety.
Is it too late to abort Newsom and the rest of the deep-state/dark-cult Democrat cabal that controls California?
Testimony of former abortion provider, Dr. Anthony Levatino (You Tube)
Fear is a powerful weapon used to oppress. This global progressive attack on the strongest nation on earth has been decades in the making. Corrupt politicians have been funded and placed to enact laws to change education, social entitlements, and to erode our freedom. Who would have imagined that we would see women attacking the very essence of who and what we are? My heart is breaking when I look at their angry faces, where did all that anger against women come from, but from other women. ???? ????
AHHH! The pinhead speaks, vomiting all over his “Catholic” upbringing about made up “rights” to allow the slaughter of unborn humans in the name of “healthcare”, because these subhuman libtard commie demonrat scum can’t butcher enough to satisfy their lust for unborn flesh!
Just image how much better life in CA would be right now if Gruesome had been aborted as an unwant “bunch of cells”! Bad luck for CA.