California State Capitol. (Photo: Kevin Sanders for California Globe)
Governor Newsom Signed AB 257 – What Is the Fast Food Council?
This Council will establish minimum standards for the fast food industry on wages, working hours, and working conditions
By Chris Micheli, September 6, 2022 6:21 am
On September 5, Labor Day, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 257. AB 257 is jointly authored by Assembly Members Chris Holden, Wendy Carrillo, Evan Low, and Luz Rivas. The bill also has eight co-authors from the two houses.
AB 257 is Chapter 246 of the Statutes of 2022. The bill amends Section 96 of the Labor Code and adds Part 4.5.5 to Division 2 of the Labor Code. AB 257 enacted the Fast Food Accountability and Standards Recovery Act or FAST Recovery Act. The new law is effective January 1, 2023.
AB 257 establishes until January 1, 2029 the Fast Food Council with the Department of Industrial Relations. The Council will have 10 members with specified powers. This Council will establish minimum standards for the fast food industry on wages, working hours, and other working conditions related to employees’ health, safety, and welfare.
AB 257 specifies that the Council’s standards will apply, rather than those of any other state agency, for fast food restaurant workers and franchises, except those of Cal-OSHA. This Council will have to report to the Legislature for a standard to become effective, no earlier than October 15 of that same year. And the Council will have to provide any requested information to the Senate and Assembly Labor Committees to review their performance and standards.
Section 1 of the bill names the act the Fast Food Accountability and Standards Recovery Act or FAST Recovery Act.
Section 2 of the bill provides eleven legislative findings and declarations, including that, for years, the fast food sector has been rife with abuse, low pay, few benefits, and minimal job security. Moreover, fast food workers, and the public they serve, face serious and unacceptable risks to their health and safety.
In addition, cooperation between state agencies with responsibility for improving and enforcing health and safety and other worker protection laws, with regular input from business and worker representatives, along with improved incentives to achieve compliance, is critical to protecting fast food workers, customers, and the public.
The Legislature concludes that sector-wide minimum health, safety, and employment standards, including standards concerning wages and other working conditions, identified by an expert body with subject matter expertise and experience in the fast food sector are necessary to protect, maintain, and ensure the health, safety, and welfare of, and to supply the necessary cost of proper living to, fast food restaurant employees.
Section 3 of the bill amends Labor Code Section 96 to allow claims to be made for violations of any standards issued by the Fast Food Council.
Section 4 of the bill adds Labor Code Part 4.5.5. to Division 2, which is titled “Fast Food Workers.” It defines the terms “fast food chain,” “Council,” “fast food restaurant,” “fast food restaurant franchisee,” “fast food restaurant,” “franchise,” “franchisee,” “franchisor, and “working conditions.”
The Fast Food Council will be established within the Department of Industrial Relations consisting of 10 members, as specified. The Governor will appoint the representatives of the state agencies, fast food restaurant employees, fast food restaurant franchisees, and fast food restaurant franchisors. The Assembly Speaker and Senate Rules Committee will each appoint one representative of an advocate for fast food restaurant employees.
The Council is subject to opening meeting laws. Its purposes are to establish sector-wide minimum standards on wages, working hours, and other working conditions adequate to ensure and maintain the health, safety, and welfare of, and to supply the necessary cost of proper living to, fast food restaurant workers and to ensure and effect interagency coordination and prompt agency responses regarding issues affecting the health, safety, and employment of fast food restaurant workers.
The Council cannot adopt any standards until after the Director of Industrial Relations receives a petition approving the creation of the Council signed by at least 10,000 California fast food restaurant employees. These are specific rules relating to petition signing and verification.
The Council is required to adopt standards on wages, working conditions, and training. To the extent there is a conflict between standards issued by the Council and the regulations issued by another state agency, the standards issued by the Council apply to fast food restaurant workers and fast food restaurant franchisees and franchisors, and the conflicting regulations of the other state agency have no force or effect with respect to fast food restaurant workers, franchisees, or franchisors.
In addition, any minimum wage established by the Council must cannot exceed $22 per hour during calendar year 2023. On January 1, 2024 and annually thereafter, the highest hourly minimum wage that can be established by the Council cannot increase by more than 3.5% or the rate of change in the averages of the most recent period for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics adjusted US CPI for urban wage earners and clerical workers.
The Council is not permitted to promulgate regulations creating new paid time off benefits or predictable scheduling. For minimum standards related to health and safety of employees, the Council is required to petition Cal-OSHA for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any occupational safety and health standard.
The Council is required to conduct a full review of the adequacy of the minimum fast food restaurant health, safety, and employment standards at least once every three years and make recommendations of any standards. The Council must also hold meetings or hearings not less than every six months.
The Council can coordinate with local agencies and those local jurisdictions with a population of 200,000 or more may establish a Local Fast Food Council, which is to hold periodic meetings. The local council can provide written recommendation to the Council. The local councils must comply with open meeting laws.
Although the Council’s standards for minimum wages, maximum hours of work, and other working conditions are those for purposes of state law, local jurisdictions can exercise their police powers to establish more protective local standards.
The Labor Commissioner and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement will enforce the Council’s standards. Occupational safety and health violations will be enforced by Cal-OSHA. The Civil Rights Department will enforce the discrimination, harassment, and related retaliation laws. There are specified rules for issuing and contesting citations.
A standard by the Council does not supersede a standard covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement if the agreement expressly provides for the wages, hours of work, and working conditions of employees, as well as a regular rate of pay not less than 30% more than the state minimum wage for those employees. On January 1, 2029, the Council will cease operations.
A fast food restaurant operator is prohibited from discharging, discriminating, or retaliating against any employee for any of three specified reasons. In such cases, the employee has a private right of action to sue the fast food restaurant operator and be entitled to reinstatement, treble wage damages, and attorney’s fees and costs.
There is a rebuttable presumption of unlawful discrimination or retaliation if a fast food restaurant operator discharges or takes any other adverse action against one of its employees within 90 days following the date when the operator had knowledge of that employee’s actions.
Finally, on January 1, 2029 and annually thereafter, if the Council is no longer operative, the minimum wage in effect the preceding December 31 must be increases by either 3.5% of the rate of change in the averages of the most recent period for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics adjusted USCPI for urban wage earners and clerical workers.
Section 5 of the bill provides that no reimbursement is required by the state to a local agency or school district for complying with this act.
- Senate Proposes Equity Impact Analysis of Legislation - April 18, 2024
- Interesting Provision in Social Media Bill - April 18, 2024
- Frequently Asked Questions about Legislative Review of State Agencies - April 18, 2024
RELATED ARTICLES
-
September 2, 2022 -
August 27, 2022 -
September 5, 2022
Thank you, Chris Micheli. This bill, now law, is unfortunately so vague that we know it will be interpreted any way this so-called “fast food council” sees fit. And given the record of the unelected bureaucrat councils and committees and commissions and bureaus in this state, it’s nearly impossible to believe that this thing won’t be a disaster. There are already laws in place to prevent workers abuses. This new law is nothing but downright intrusion and interference with an owner’s ability to run his private business in a way that satisfies both worker and customer and does it efficiently. Employee not satisfied? There are plenty of other jobs and employers begging for applicants. Customer not satisfied? There are other places to take one’s business. That’s how it’s supposed to work. Not more unnecessary and burdensome rules that will eliminate jobs, dispirit good employees, retain bad employees, close franchises, and see a rise in robots and kiosks, which will be one of the “unexpected” consequences of such govt/union attempts at controlling private business. As you know.
Some of us wonder whether Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democrat cronies in the legislature took a large equity position in a company that manufactures fast food robots before passing this legislation? No doubt his auntie Nancy Pelosi and her husband Paul did so?
LOL. Wouldn’t be surprised! Let’s check it out. Can we? Or are we forbidden from looking to see where these politicians’ interests actually lie?
All I know is that (to give one example) the once-upon-a-time-mayor of my town was found to be heavily invested in American Standard plumbing after the City Fathers voted to have all plumbing ripped out upon home sale or new condo construction or conversion and replaced with useless low-flow plumbing at every outlet. A lone but brave alternative newspaper reported on it but that report was quickly scrubbed from the internet, the reporter apparently “chastised,” and no one was the wiser after that except for a few of us who never forget. Fat lot of good it’s done us. 🙂
So this council can creat5 a minimum wage that is higher than the state minimum wage? “In addition, any minimum wage established by the Council must cannot exceed $22 per hour during calendar year 2023. On January 1, 2024 and annually thereafter, the highest hourly minimum wage that can be established by the Council cannot increase by more than 3.5% or the rate of change in the averages of the most recent period for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics adjusted US CPI for urban wage earners and clerical workers.”
Yup. An ungodly high minimum wage for a fast-food fulfillment worker. “The better to pay us dues with!” says the union rep who comes to collect. It’s disgusting, it’s corrupt, it’s un-American, it’s unworkable, it rewards all the wrong people, and it’s only a matter of time until it can’t sustain itself. Thanks a lot, greedy Lorena “AB5 The Job Killer” Gonzalez and her witch’s coven of union cronies. Great job!
Looks like a classic case of using the pretext of helping people to create crony work for well-connected labor law attorneys. You create a confusing web of regulations and then the vultures threaten to sue, extorting settlements. Meanwhile, the very people the law says it is intended to help are left behind.
Great point. The opposite of what was claimed is what actually happens, not that what was claimed was desired in the first place, and guess which industry grows? The Shakedown Lawyer Industry. Fabulous. Just what we need. (*eyeroll*)
get your great burritos while you can. this law is going to shut down every mom and pop mexican place in california. a happy meal is going to cost you $15 at any mcd’s that is left open. most will close….
Game Over Peter O. And Scott Rodrick
I am a franchisee. I have no choice but to increase my prices, reduce staff, and make my existing employees more productive to the best legal extent possible. I know many of my customers will complain and I am not in a high-income neighborhood. This is illegal as it interferes/conflicts with my existing franchise agreement. Also, increase in wages increases my payroll tax and workman’s compensation premiums – so where is my representative voice? From a council who determines my business expenses when they are not even privy to my own local needs? In essence they are now making financial decisions in my own business without being a business partner with all the associated liabilities. Their decisions affect my menu pricing model and how I can make adjustments based on other costs such as inventory, seasonal promotions, etc.
The larger chain conglomerates will survive because they have the economies of scale but the one or two unit franchisees will suffer. The result? A consolidation of the industry where there will be more larger corporations while the smaller business owners disappear. This is a destruction of the middle-class and a shift over time of an oligarchy environment. It would have been more better had they made this minimum wage rules applicable based on revenues, but they didn’t. It’s manifested and perceived social justice through political lobbying across the board. When I see the news press videos, I don’t see teenagers or young adults complaining about their work environment at McDonalds – they are older folks demanding their jobs be equivalent to a highly-skilled high paid position. $22/hr will create higher disparities of pay across multiple industries where duties and responsibilities are so different. It will artificially disrupt the market. Pretty soon it will be like the CCP controlling State-Owned Enterprises in China.
Oh, I’ll go you one better, John G. I believe the “fast-food workers” we always saw on the local news protesting at the local MacDonald’s franchise were union member shills and not “workers” at all. So if I’m right, the whole thing was a con job from the very beginning!
Thank you for taking the time to post your first-hand story. This situation is untenable and you are right that “it will be like the CCP controlling State-Owned Enterprises in China.” I hope the industry’s proposed referendum will be successful. Best wishes to you.
If the “council” raises minimum wage to $22 an hour in 2023, that will represent an increase in wages of over 30%!!! That is going to kill a lot of businesses. Also, the demand for higher wages will spread across all industries. This law is a disaster.