Home>Articles>Leg Analyst Projects California Will Have $31 Billion Budget Surplus Next Year
Marie Waldron
Assemblywoman Marie Waldron. (Photo: Kevin Sanders for California Globe)

Leg Analyst Projects California Will Have $31 Billion Budget Surplus Next Year

‘There’s something wrong when the state is flush with extra cash while the people have to choose between putting food on the table and filling the gas tank’

By Evan Symon, November 18, 2021 11:43 am

According to the 2022-2023 California state budget Fiscal Outlook report compiled by the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) on Wednesday, California will have a $31 billion surplus next year.

This marks the second budget year in a row where a large eleven-figure surplus was announced. Last budget year, California had a $76 billion budget surplus, although that figure was later knocked down to $38 billion by the LAO.

Should the $31 billion surplus figure hold, California would go over a constitutional limit on spending surplus funds, forcing the state to give back some of the money back to the people of the state. This year, California spent much of the surplus on housing and homeless programs, with $12 billion in new funding alone going to homeless programs. But, due to spending limits, $12 billion alone was spent on Golden State Stimulus payments to most Californians, with another $1.5 billion going to small business relief.

For the upcoming budget, the LAO named multiple ways that the state would give back part of the surplus to the people, including more direct payments, tax cuts, infrastructure projects, or public school spending. By state law, 40% of all state taxes must go to public education each year, meaning, if the surplus remains on track, public schools and universities could see as much as $11 billion be divested down to them next year.

Governor Gavin Newsom (Photo: Gage Skidmore)

At a press conference in Long Beach on Wednesday, Governor Gavin Newsom said that while it was still too early to say for sure how much the surplus would be, he was supportive of giving money back to the taxpayers, similar to the Golden State Stimulus program this year. He also highlighted infrastructure projects, one-time only projects, and more money going into a rainy day fund as being likely recipients of the surplus.

“How we framed that historic surplus last year, similarly, we will frame our approach this year,” said Governor Newsom on Wednesday. “I’m very proud of the historic tax rebate last year, and I look forward to making the decision that I think is in the best interests of 40 million Californians. We are going to substantially increase our one-time investments in infrastructure. That’s one budget preview you can count on.”

A combination of high taxes on Californian businesses, large post-pandemic increases in business, a rising stock market, a hot housing market, and rapidly increasing income taxes as more people return to jobs after the pandemic all contributed to the projected surplus. According to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, businesses brought in a record $216.8 billion in sales from April through July this year. Compared to the same three months last year, that’s an increase of 38.8%. It’s also higher than pre-pandemic levels, with April-June sales in 2021 being 17.4% higher than April-June 2019 sales.

A projected $31 billion surplus

While the LAO is warning that these gains may not hold for long, especially since prices for goods, services, and gasoline are rising quickly due to inflation and supply-line issues, many remain optimistic that California can hold the line and bring about another surplus.

“Many Californians are struggling,” Paris Hill, a fiscal planning consultant told the Globe on Thursday. “While another rebate check is nice, taxation is the huge issue here for many. A lot of people are thinking of leaving the state or moving to a cheaper place in-state because of how high taxes are, and yet here is California coming in way under budget. The state government is trying to downplay this and trying to excite people on what it can be spent on, but the real issue is why there is such a high surplus now, and a big part of the answer is high taxes.”

“And since rebates can come out at opportune times, like, say, next year during an election year, similar to how Newsom announced the stimulus program this year right when he wasn’t doing so good in the recall polls, this can prove to be important politically, not just fiscally.”

Lawmakers also noted issues with having a large surplus during a tougher economic time right now, with Assemblywoman Marie Waldron (R-Escondido) noting on Wednesday, “There’s something wrong when the state is flush with extra cash — $750 for every man, woman and child — while ordinary people have to choose between putting food on the table and filling their gas tank.”

Currently, while the projected figure is $31 billion, the LAO is also giving a range of between $10 billion and $60 billion in projected stimulus earnings based on multiple factors. Newsom’s first 2022-2023 budget proposal, expected early next year, will likely include his plans for the projected surplus.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Evan Symon
Spread the news:


15 thoughts on “Leg Analyst Projects California Will Have $31 Billion Budget Surplus Next Year

  1. surplus = over taxed.

    democrats see surplus = extra expenditures for pet projects

    Democrats are not for poor or middle class they are there to supply the wealthy and elite

  2. Yeah, sure… it’s a “projected” surplus… ’til it’s NOT…

    Why trust these lying liars on this one??? They’ve lied to us about everything else…watch this mysteriously disappear in real life…

  3. Well, I for one didn’t get any “stimulus” check last year from the Greasy Haired Burglar, but paid in plenty of taxes. How about reducing or removing the ridiculous gas tax and giving us a break for once? No, I didn’t think so. Like orwellianism said, they see this “windfall” as money to throw away on illegals or any other pet projects instead of returning it to the people. Disgusted.

  4. The state should do the right thing and place this surplus into a rainy day fund. CA is well known for many natural disasters. The extra money would be very helpful the next time there is a major wildfire or an earthquake.

    1. the “RIGHT” thing is to level out the amount of taxation it should never have such a discrepancy.

      Taxpayers are being over taxed, and the right thing is to give it back to the rightful owners.

      Rainy fund is still well above its average and rainy day was never to be a place to store money on those being over taxed as a prize

  5. I agree W16521 having funds set aside for emergencies is a good idea. I would not mind having less money in a emergency fund in exchange for lower taxes across the board and some of these fees at the DMV are ridiculous. Like paying over $500 to register my vehicle.

  6. Republican Assemblywoman Marie Waldron wisely noted that there’s something wrong when the state is flush with extra cash from taxpayers — $750 for every man, woman and child — while ordinary people struggle to put food on the table and fill their gas tanks. If only a wise politician like her could be voted in as governor? It will never happen because of Democrat voter fraud with their bogus mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting and rigged voting machines?

  7. Didn’t California borrow $25 billion from the Fed for EDD fraud?.. has it been paid back?
    IF, and that’s a big IF, they were to return it to the people who paid it, plan on it being at mid-term elections as
    as if it had come from their own pockets (LOL). Still waiting on budget accountability CAFR from June 2020.
    The people have been OVER-TAXED on everything to the 9’s, so technically a surplus is no surprise. Reduce taxes, remove gas tax, reduce DMV fees to start.

  8. How about eliminating the car registration tax, the gasoline tax, and lowering the CA income tax rate until all funds are used up? CA taxpayers will appreciate the lowering of their costs to live in the state. It IS the taxpayers’ money after all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *