Home>Articles>Why Should California Taxpayers Pick Up the Tab for Kamala Harris’ Security Detail?

Vice President Kamala Harris, joined by President Joe Biden, delivers remarks on voting rights Tuesday, January 11, 2022, at Morehouse College in Atlanta. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)

Why Should California Taxpayers Pick Up the Tab for Kamala Harris’ Security Detail?

Harris should rely on private security – she is a private citizen now, on a book tour

By Katy Grimes, September 3, 2025 7:15 am

As former Vice President Kamala Harris is preparing for her nationwide book tour to promote her memoir, 107 Days, President Donald Trump  revoked her Secret Service protection last week.

Just prior to leaving office in January, President Joe Biden extended VP Kamala Harris’ secret service protection to 18 months from the usual 6 months.

The California Highway Patrol will reportedly step in to provide security after the state granted Harris “dignitary status” last week.

By statute, vice presidents and their families receive Secret Service protection only while in office. There is a standard six-month grace period in which the former vice president and their immediate family remain under Secret Service watch.

Presidents are entitled to lifetime protection, while vice presidents have limits on their post-office security.

“After Trump ended Harris’s Secret Service protection in a memorandum on last week, California officials scrambled to add new security for Harris. Sources told the Los Angeles Times that the CHP has been allotted to cover her,” The Examiner reported.

Friday, the LA Times reported Harris “will receive protection from the California Highway Patrol after President Trump revoked her Secret Service protection, law enforcement sources said Friday.”

Governor Gavin Newsom would need to sign off on the new arrangement with the CHP. However, Newsom would not confirm the arrangement, the LA Times said. “Our office does not comment on security arrangements,” said Izzy Gordon, a spokesperson for Newsom. “The safety of our public officials should never be subject to erratic, vindictive political impulses.”

“The decision came after Newsom’s office and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass were in discussions Thursday evening on how best to address the situation. Harris resides in the western portion of Los Angeles.”

“Without Secret Service agents at her side, Harris is expected to rely on private security teams to manage safety during public appearances. The move has triggered sharp criticism from her allies, who argue that her high profile makes her a target and that stripping protection is politically motivated.”

Harris should rely on private security – she is a private citizen now, on a book tour. Many “high-profile” people have private security detail.

President Donald Trump announced last March he was ending the ongoing Secret Service protection details assigned to Joe Biden’s adult children, which the former president had extended to July shortly before leaving office in January. Trump said there were 18 agents assigned to Hunter Biden’s protective detail while in South Africa. He said Ashley Biden had 13 agents assigned to her detail.

The President also revoked Secret Service protection from former national security adviser John Bolton, and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Former Vice President Mike Pence did not have his secret service protection extended.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

20 thoughts on “Why Should California Taxpayers Pick Up the Tab for Kamala Harris’ Security Detail?

  1. This really tears it. NOOOOO, the hard-working screwed-over-to-the-max-by-Gavin-&-Co. California taxpayers should NOT be picking up the tab for Worst Presidential Candidate Ever Kamala Harris. Will we ever live to see the day that the Worst Governor Ever Himself, Gavin Newsom, stops playing stupid retaliatory games like this? Is that a stupid question? And by the way, the California Highway Patrol is not the personal foot-servant of Gavin Newsom. Their proper function is to be on the highways doing all they can to keep the highways safe under impossible broken-down road conditions, deter and prevent people from scrolling on their phones, driving like maniacs, and driving under the influence, in addition to helping stranded motorists and showing up to do their jobs in the aftermath of our many slaughterhouse car wrecks. NOT making sure Kamala gets her Doritos and lime water as she pointlessly makes her way from one ghost-town book event to the next.

    1. The CA democrats have to give of their money for what they”invested “ to promote their candidates in the 2024 elections. No one else. I a Republican do not want to support their stupidity.

      1. Sid Abma — No kidding, you and other CA taxpayers shouldn’t be paying for this AT ALL (DUH!), because Time’s Up! for Kamala’s extended-by-Biden security detail anyway, which Gavin and Co are choosing to once again totally lie to the public about. But Gavin LOVES sticking his finger in your eye, doesn’t he? And by the way, NOT paying for this is true whether Kamala is a pointless, ethically and mentally challenged former Vice President and miserably failed Presidential candidate or not. And no one hears you, Gavin Gruesome, when you invoke Trump as the problem, behind whatever, for the BILLIONTH time. Oh, brother!

  2. Giving Harris a protective detail would be outside of the CHP’s Dignitary Protection Section’s policy as she does not meet the criteria for other (elected) dignitary visiting the state. Of course, Gavin has proven that rules only apply to the masses and not the ruling class.

    1. Micheli’s (who’s a constant contributor here) unrelenting rants, the undertone being our mandated respect the for one of the most corrupt government entities in the world (California): He’s a shill.

    2. I agree. This is certainly not the precedent which Democrats should be allowed to establish, nor was it arranged in such a way to affirm party impartiality by a state law enforcement agency.

  3. What is the net worth of harris and emhoff, shouldn’t they be able to afford to hire their own security? However, milk one government cow… Harris has suckled the government teat ever since she was introduced willie brown’s mattress, she’s gotten taxpayer freebies ever since – hasn’t earned anything, it was her turn to be president and that’s the first time she ever heard the word “no.” One key difference between harris and monica lewinsky is harris got a pass and lewinsky got pummeled.

    1. Nope, it’s reported Lewinsky living in lavish digs in Santa Barbara CA.

      Lewinsky and Harris both contaminated in a way that never goes away: Willie and Bill, WOW!

      1. I don’t know how Lewinski lives, there are vile people who live like sultans and die in their sleep while veritable saints are persecuted. It was not my purpose to judge Lewinski in my post, I’m not a perfect person. The simularities between Harris and Lewinski is that they were seduced by powerful men, and women have a weakness for charisma, power and wealth. The differences are that Lewinki was not only scathingly denounced by clinton, but reviled and humiliated by the public as a whore. Willie gave harris a job, ignited her political career via the bay area political machine from where she eventually became vice president with only 3% voter approval, and no one cares that willie brown’s mattress is stuck to her shoe. So, in the greatly unfair court of public opinion, Lewinski was regarded as an unmitigated slut while harris at the extreme worst is an abject idiot. So unfair.

        1. To be fair, it’s common knowledge that Harris gave Willie Brown lots of “jobs” as payment for her political career.

          1. Ok, quid pro quo between harris and married man brown that began with brown’s matress with no public condemnation? So, to be fair, I ask what did Lewinski get out of it? A lot of sanctimonious harumphing and a perpetual black eye. What was the punishment for brown and clinton? A big fat nothing.

          2. Delayed reaction for getting the joke. Brown got the full bophae while clinton got the sky colored skirt especial. thanks for the laugh. Misspelling due to schpam algaerythms bloqing me

  4. Sure, why not? Let’s add more to the deficit! After all hard earned tax payer money is play money! Who needs paved roads, public law enforcement, free flowing water…?
    Not me! I want private citizen, Kamala to have CHP security!!😏

  5. Based on the timeline, can anyone else at least suspect there is a connection between this and the Guber’s recent announcement of [Operation Voluntary Surge]?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *