California Teachers Association’s ‘Curriculum’ of Shame

The California Teachers Association just made clear—again—it does not give a fig about your child’s education. Indoctrination? Oh yeah. Education? Nahhhh.

At its recent “solidarity conference” at the swanky Westin Bonaventure Hotel in Los Angeles, the union’s leaders paraded a list of presentations that mirrors last summer’s “new business items” at the National Education Association’s (NEA) big national convention in Florida.

In both cases, attendees were treated to ideological training but almost nothing that had anything to do with student achievement. Many of those attending probably had no need for such steerage as they were already soulmates of the racist, class-warfare, and anti-American features of the presentations.

But I can assert with authority that there were at least several real teachers in the audience who are deeply troubled by the union agenda. I know because those teachers sent me the union-prepared propaganda documents used to push the union’s radical agenda onto unsuspecting teachers attending the conference.

Most good teachers, the ones who actually care whether your child can read, write, do math and understand arts and history in a non-ideological context, stayed home. They can be glad they did, but it’s important that all of them read this column—and the union’s “solidarity conference” flyer—to gain understanding on how their so-called union is destroying our kids and schools.

At the swanky Westin Bonaventure, union members with a lot of extra time and money on their hands were treated to nearly two dozen presentations. The conference logo said “our voice, our union” and the union’s voice as usual looked a lot more like a political rally for communists than a teachers convention.

Just like at the NEA shindig in Florida, union members were regaled by slogans and euphemisms that unions dream up for radical Democratic political leaders and other Marxist voices backed by unions.

Science teachers could learn some “restorative narratives about dead white men,” and “a theory of intersection between gender, race, and STEM as an emerging ‘industrial class.’” What? Ethnic studies concentrated on “indigenous cultures across the regions of North and South America.” Presenters from Oakland shared an “insightful documentary” of the school district’s introduction of “yoga and mindfulness” classes.

Attendees learned of “the transformative potential of integrating Native Ways of Knowing into K-12 public education.” Another presenter “confronting white nationalism” said without irony she would teach union members “how to recognize exposure to extremist ideology.” Another promised to show attendees “how you can further develop your social justice activism.” And yet others promised to provide lessons on “how to amplify student engagement in integrating Ethnic Studies in any subject area including STEM and the Arts.”

One presenter fretted about racial, economic, and class polarization. Since these derelictions are pretty much the entire “pedagogy” of the leftists now running the government education system, you must wonder, wherever do people get these ideas? The answer: unions.

Want a new acronym? “Adult learners” at another presentation got a dose of how to “reflect upon critical dialogue” to help new teachers better treat (here’s the new acronym) LGBTQIA2-S+ students. A bit ominously, the presenter said, “As teacher educators/coaches/and mentors, we are uniquely positioned in shaping beginning teachers.” Bad syntax aside, you can see the union doesn’t restrict its indoctrinations to students; it has a big role to play with new teachers, too.

Cecily Myart-Cruz, the firebrand leftist who heads United Teachers Los Angeles, promised a session to provide teachers with ways to take actions in the classroom, school site and community to promote “racial justice movements.”