Frequently Asked Questions About Urgency Clause Bills
Are there any limitations on the use of urgency clauses?
By Chris Micheli, February 3, 2024 2:35 am
What is an urgency clause? It is a section added to the end of a bill that makes the bill immediately take effect when signed into law by the Governor.
What is the main difference between a regular bill and an urgency clause bill? The regular bill takes effect on the following January 1, while the urgency bill takes effect immediately.
Is there a special vote requirement for an urgency bill? Yes, a bill containing an urgency clause must pass both houses by a 2/3 vote.
Are urgency clause bills treated differently than regular bills? In general, an urgency clause bill is not subject to the usual calendar deadlines contained in the Joint Rules that apply to regular bills.
If a bill is introduced without an urgency clause, can such a clause be added later? In order to add an urgency clause after the bill has been introduced without this clause, permission of the respective Rules Committee is required.
What determines an urgency? Article IV, Section 8(d) specifies that “urgency statutes are those necessary for immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.”
Does an urgency statute require any additional provisions? Yes, an urgency bill must contain an urgency clause which specifies why the bill qualifies for this special status. Section 8(d) requires “a statement of facts constituting the necessity shall be set forth in one section of the bill.”
Why does the presiding officer at floor sessions announce the same vote twice for an urgency bill? Because the state Constitution requires “in each house, the section and the bill shall be passed separately, each by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two thirds of the membership concurring.”
Are there any limitations on the use of urgency clauses? Yes, Article IV, Section 8(d) provides that “an urgency statute may not create or abolish any office or change the salary, term, or duties of any office, or grant any franchise or special privilege, or create any vested right or interest.”
- Fees in California Appellate Courts - November 7, 2024
- Emergency Decisions in Administrative Adjudications - November 7, 2024
- California Supreme Court’s Most Recent Statutory Interpretation Case - November 6, 2024
Yes a emergency bill needs to be signed to protect Jewish heritage from being taken away from us by the federal judiciary in order and to protect them from being removed from their homes by the federal government in the process of passing laws that would be unconstitutional for them and protect them from any kind of criminal acts by law enforcement agencies and government officials who would not do anything about it because of their religion and their beliefs they have been in power since they are the government of this nation in this state of America 🇺🇸 and Texas they have been doing everything to protect them from their citizens from all of the government they have been the only one who is in power in this world 🌎 for over two years now and are being destroyed by this country and it’s not even close enough for them to get a new generation of people are not in this world because we are being killed!!!