California State Governor Gavin Newsom before a meeting in Sacramento, CA, May 31, 2020. (Photo: Matt Gush/Shutterstock)
Gov. Gavin Newsom Announces Opposition to Wealth Tax Proposal
‘Just talk to all of these $100k+ earners moving out – they feel that they are overpaying their fair share’
By Evan Symon, February 18, 2023 9:18 am
Governor Gavin Newsom announced his opposition to the AB 259 by Assemblyman Alex Lee (D-Silicon Valley), the wealth tax bill earlier this week, cementing that the bill would ultimately not be passed this year even if passed by both the Assembly and Senate.
While Newsom has backed tax increases in the past, he has had a history of not imposing wealth taxes, or taxes imposed by the state based on the assets of an individual. One of Newsom’s largest stands against a wealth tax came in 2020, when he vehemently came out against AB 2088. At the time, Newsom said that “A wealth tax is not part of the conversation. Wealth tax proposals are going nowhere in California.”
In 2022, Newsom surprised many people once again by coming out against Prop 30, a ballot initiative that would have raised taxes on wealthy Californians to fund wildfire management and electric car incentives. Prop 30 ultimately failed in November in a landslide 58%-42% vote.
On Wednesday, Newsom continued his opposition to wealth taxes with a statement from his office confirming that he will continue to oppose new wealth taxes, including AB 259. Despite the bill being more “modest” in what it would tax – namely imposing an annual worldwide net worth tax of 1 percent on net worth above $50 million, rising to 1.5 percent on net worth over $1.0 billion – compared to previous bills, the Governor is still laying down the gauntlet.
But why? Newsom’s constant fight to introduce a wealth has raised the eyebrows of many on the left, including the odd team-ups that came as a result. For example, opposition against Prop 30 last year was made up of, among others, the Governor, the California Republican Party, the California Teacher’s Union, and the California Chamber of Commerce. And this time around with AB 259, Newsom finds himself on the opposite side of unions.
One of the big reasons has been California’s large surpluses in recent years. With so much revenue coming in, a wealth tax really wasn’t needed. Another reason has been Newsom’s focus on the “welfare and fiscal health of the entire state.” While that sort of phrase can mean anything, it comes down to the fact that 700,000 Californians have left the state since the 2020. Coupled with many businesses pulling out as well, a major wealth tax would only worsen this exodus, causing California to lose out on even more income than the wealth tax would bring in. Newsom has said on many occasions that he is worried about what such an increased exodus would do. Even with the state facing a $22 billion deficit, Newsom, as well as many other lawmakers, cannot justify pulling the trigger on such a tax.
While there are some other wealth tax proposals up there, including a proposed Constitutional Amendment currently in the Assembly and a 2024 proposition that’s planned to be on the ballot, Newsom has continued to be a strange ally amongst those fighting wealth taxes in California.
“It doesn’t take a genius to see why a wealth tax would just be terrible for California,” John Lemkow, a wealth advisor in the Bay Area who has had many clients move out of the state in recent years, told the Globe on Friday. “Just talk to all of these $100k+ earners moving out. It’s being squeezed. It’s because they feel that they are overpaying their fair share. It’s because they don’t like how their tax dollars are being spent here. It’s because they can’t grow their businesses here.:
“Many are barely staying here, and I’ve heard from many that one more big tax increase, or should I say, one more targeted tax increase, would be the final straw for them. It’s easy for some people to shout ‘Tax the rich’, but guess what? Tax them too much, they leave, and you have even less money coming in than before. Now, a lot of people in California realize them. Republicans, some Democrats of course, and Newsom of all people. There’s a lot you can pin on Newsom. But even he knows that big taxes aimed at wealthy Californians would only make the situation worse.”
AB 259 is considered unlikely to be passed this year.
- Los Angeles City Council Passes Sanctuary City Ordinance - November 20, 2024
- Prop. 32 Fails As Voters Reject Statewide Minimum Wage Going Up To $18 An Hour - November 20, 2024
- Former LA DA Jackie Lacey Speaks About Nathan Hochman’s Victory - November 19, 2024
RELATED ARTICLES
-
September 30, 2020 -
-
October 19, 2018
This idiot thinks he will be the next preezy of the steezy so he sets up something like a wealth tax in order to shoot it down.
Exactly, CW —- legislature plays the “bad cop” and he plays the “good cop.”
Bonus points for protecting his ultra-wealthy BFFs.
A wealth tax would might cost Newsom’s World Economic Forum globalist masters a few bucks and they might sell off their coastal mansions? Many of us are so fed up with Newsomlini (aka Hair gel Hitler) and his Weinstein trollop wife?
Say what you want about the politician, he’s got some questions to answer. Between his handling PG&E with kidgloves after the devastation from fires they started to being too friendly with the megarich, (What’s he worth, anyway?) He’s forgotten that the President’s plan to tax the folks who make more than $400,000 a year would keep those making $100,000 here.
I don’t understand why some people like to drag a politician’s spouse into the conversation. (Unless, they’re a politician as well!) Justice Thomas’s wife excluded, she made a HUGE mistake.
Unfortunately so-called First Partner Jennifer Seibel-Newsom dragged herself into the spotlight and the conversation by using taxpayer funds to showcase for young pre-teen students in CA’s public schools a radical, propagandist film (without parents’ knowledge, by the way) whose theme was “toxic males” and which also included a number of startling pornographic images. This occurred as the result of a pay-to-play scheme by the Governor’s (and First Partner’s) office that was recently uncovered by the transparency organization “Open the Books.”
“Open the Books Exposes the Legalized Pay-to-Play Scheme by Newsom, Inc.”
https://californiaglobe.com/articles/open-the-books-exposes-the-legalized-pay-to-play-scheme-by-newsom-inc/
Excerpt:
“Newsom’s divisive Covid policies and Jennifer’s films/curricula arguably fueled the youth mental health problem. However, by addressing it with nearly $5 billion and 10,000 school counselors, the Newsom’s generated a policy win for the governor and a business win for Siebel Newsom and her nonprofit, The Representation Project.”
Also recommend to everyone, since you rightly raised the issue of Gov Gavin Newsom and PG&E and their history of playing footsie, the excellent series done two or three years ago by ABC10 called “Fire-Power-Money,” with special emphasis — if you don’t have much time — on the episode “Blood Money.”
https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/abc10-originals/firepowermoney-season2/103-0ffcde6a-8884-4e2c-98b8-2a9f9a028e0d#longform_chapter_3
I’m all for it. The sooner big tech pulls up stakes and moves to Texas, the better off the country will be. California. Who do you think is paying the freight for Newsom’s elect me and end freedom push?
If we had an honest press Newsom wouldn’t last a month.
Audit the last high profile “wealth tax” that funded MHSA – Mental Health Services Act. Voters passed this with the expectations the billions of dollars it would raise would get the mentally impaired street people into tax-dollar funded state care institutions.
All it did was grow this new industry called Homeless Inc – the social service agencies who only keep their jobs by NOT fixing this huge state issue – mentally impaired street people who have turned major state economic centers into third world cesspits.
“Eat the Rich” has a terrible track record in this state – and Newsom facing seriously declining state tax revenues is finally waking up to what he and his Democrat party super-majority did to this state.