New Bill Requiring Businesses to Disclose Personal Information Used for Political Purposes
SB 746 would require the business to submit personal information to the California Privacy Protection Agency
By Chris Micheli, February 24, 2021 7:41 am
On February 19, Senator Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) introduced Senate Bill 746 related to the use of personal information for political purposes. The bill would amend Section 1798.130 of, and add Section 1798.111 to, the Civil Code.
Section One of the bill would Civil Code Section 1798.111. It would grant consumers the right to request that a business collecting personal information about the consumer disclose to the consumer whether or not the business uses that personal information for a political purpose. In addition, a business that collects personal information about a consumer and uses that information for a political purpose would be required to disclose to the consumer all of the following information upon receipt of a verifiable consumer request from the consumer:
- The name of any candidate or committee for which the consumer’s personal information was used for a political purpose.
- The title of any ballot measure for which the consumer’s personal information was used for a political purpose.
- If the consumer’s personal information was used to support or oppose the candidate, committee, or measure.
In addition, under the bill, a business that engages in these activities would be required to annually disclose to the California Privacy Protection Agency all of the following:
- The name of any candidate or committee for which personal information was used for a political purpose.
- The title of any ballot measure for which personal information was used for a political purpose.
SB 746 would require the business to submit to the California Privacy Protection Agency a statement certified under penalty of perjury by the chief executive officer of the business that the business has correctly disclosed all activity. The bill would define “political purpose” to be activity undertaken by a business with the actual knowledge, or at the direction, of one or more of the officers of the business for the purpose of influencing, or attempting to influence, the action of the voters for or against candidates or ballot measures.
Section Two of the bill would amend Civil Code Section 1798.310. This section concerns the requirement that businesses provide reasonably accessibility to consumers of specified information. The bill would add the additional disclosure by a business to identify the name of any candidate, committee, or the title of any ballot measure for which the consumer’s personal information was used for a political purpose and whether the consumer’s personal information was used to support or oppose the candidate or measure. Section Three of the bill would amend Civil Code Section 1798.310 to provide the same information.
Section Five of the bill would provide a legislative finding and declaration that this bill furthers the purposes and intent of The California Privacy Rights Act of 2020. The bill is expected to be heard in March.
- The Legislative Discriminatory Harassment Retaliation Protection Act - October 31, 2024
- Contribution Rates under the UI Code - October 31, 2024
- Legislative Funds and Administration - October 30, 2024
I wonder what evil use Democrats will have for this information? Targeting conservatives no doubt.
Was wondering the same thing. Probably comes from wanting to blot out some mythical and minuscule edge the Dems imagine Repubs and other sensible people have somewhere.
How about adding a section that says a consumer whose information was used for political purposes without specifically opting-in and agreeing, is allowed to firebomb the business and shoot the owner(s) without further process required. If you want to use me as meat for your little machine, watch your ass, ’cause I BITE BACK!
So, reading about Section One, the first move is STILL that the consumer must initiate the request for information! This is BULLSHIT! How about we put it on businesses to tell people UP FRONT that they use customer information for political purposes, etc., etc. In other words, businesses that use customer information for political purposes must bear the burden for informing customers of this, and getting verifiable permission from the customer! The end result is that businesses would get out of the business of using customer information. That would solve the problem and cost businesses nothing as long as they stay apolitical and clean.
I have little doubt this is an attempt to create a data base of conservative political donors to be targeted by BLM and antifa terrorists as well as the kancel kulture kommunists.
Yep, E.T. Skinner is an evil, communist from Berkeley… Say no more….
That’s what it sounds like. These people have no shame.
SCARLETT LETTERING those who do not OBEY and CONFORM to tyrannical power
Does anyone do this ? Is this a solution looking for a problem ?
So, would Google, Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube fall under these requirements?
Exactly! It’s really incredible what a double standard dems adhere to!