Petaluma Becomes First American City To Ban New Gas Pump, Station Construction
‘They were just trying to make a statement rather than think of the public good here’
By Evan Symon, March 3, 2021 6:02 pm
The Sonoma County city of Petaluma just this week became the first city in the United States to ban the construction of new gas pumps and stations.
The push to ban new stations in Petaluma and through proposed local legislation in other Californian cities started in September 2020 when Governor Gavin Newsom issued an Executive Order to phase out the sale of all new gas powered vehicles in California by 2035. Despite an overall negative response from Californians, many lawmakers pursued local laws to add more electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and other similar ordinances. At the state level, this has included bills that would ban fracking and other oil and gas extraction methods by 2027. But at the local level, this has included bills to stop new gas stations from being built.
Petaluma led the way among Californian cities, with the Petaluma City Council unanimously approving the bill that would stop new gas pump and station construction in favor of alternate fuel stations late last month. On Monday, the zoning rules were finalized, becoming official the very next day.
According to the new rules, while all 16 gas stations in the city of 60,000 people can continue to operate as normal, no new pumps may be built. Only EV charging plugs and other alternate fueling methods will be allowed in new construction and station expansion.
In addition to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order, the new law was passed to reduce pollution and curb fossil fuel use. Over-saturation of gas stations in the city was also hinted at, with the law mentioning that every resident in the city is currently, at most, five minutes away from a station.
“An inventory of current and approved gas stations shows they are, based on proximity, adequate to serve existing and planned residents dependent upon internal combustion engines,” reads the new law. “Prohibiting new gas stations serves the public interest by preventing new sources of pollution that adversely impact environmental and human health.”
Reaction to the new law has been mixed. While many local lawmakers have praised the new law, with many specifically noting that it would help the city become carbon neutral by 2030, more attacked the policy on Wednesday.
Concern over the new law
“An alarming trend is spreading across localities in California,” said the California Fuels & Convenience Alliance in a statement on Wednesday. “Various localities throughout the state have started down a misguided direction, banning new gas stations within city and county limits, through ordinance or moratorium. This single-minded approach will ultimately cause greater harm for communities than any potential benefit.
“Many of these proposals emerge from the belief that by reducing the availability of fueling sites, they will reduce the amount of fuel consumed. This assumption is naïve at best, or textbook NIMBYism at its worst. Despite California’s intended goal of phasing out combustion engines, the fact remains that a vast majority of Californians continue to drive gas-powered cars. These Californians still require fueling sites within reasonable proximity of their homes or places of employment.”
“These bans also reduce vital competition within the community. Competition between businesses is imperative for both businesses themselves, and for consumers.”
Many in Petaluma also noted concern.
“We have a lot of tourists coming through here,” explained Petaluma store owner Richard Denton to the Globe. “This is wine country after all. And many com from out of California. They drive here.”
“Even if that state goes through with the gas car ban, we’re still going to need gas stations for at least some time in the future. That means new stations, or replacing broken pumps with new ones to meet demand. But what they are asking is way too much at once. Why not allow building more electric chargers, then wane down on gas pumps as demand falls?”
“They were just trying to make a statement rather than think of the public good here.”
Petaluma’s new law is expecting to influence other cities currently debating on passing similar laws in California this year.
- San Diego County Board Of Supervisors Chair Nora Vargas To Leave Office Next Month Despite Winning Reelection - December 21, 2024
- Dozens Of Oakland Lawmakers, Business Leaders Urge Rep. Barbara Lee To Run For Mayor In Upcoming Special Election - December 21, 2024
- Backlash Continues Against The Oakland City Council For Approving $100 Million In Budget Cuts - December 20, 2024
Gov’t forcing people to buy expensive battery draining cars that will only be 60% capacity holding by year 5. Without acknowledging what is in a battery and what it needs to be created – then disposed of.
So, no new pumps. Guess that means all pumps including diesel. But of course, that would have the consequence of negatively impacting a primary method of commercial intra and interstate transportation (trucking industry) of goods. Wonder if the altruistic climate sheep thought about that or did their usual decision-making process of we are the government and to hell with the people, the economy and actual factual information. Note that since (1) CA already has rolling brownouts, (2) components for solar panels/wind turbines/batteries require energy to make and components made from hydrocarbons, (3) all these so-called alternative energy devices have a finite shelf life measured in years, (4) components of batteries and solar panels (heavy metals, etc.) are expensive and toxic requiring careful disposal, (5) no wind, no sun, no clean solar panels means no energy, (6) this continued fantasyland journey is more expensive and actually more polluting than our current energy producing resources and (7) a multitude of other real/actual practicalities is going to drive the cost of goods (including heating and cooling) to the end user significantly higher. So as usual the politically connected and well healed in society get a pass and those who have to actually have endure these government-controlled mandates have to pay the price and alter lifestyles to accommodate their stupidity.
The solution becomes clearer every day…
These idiotic feel-good virtue signalers are only making their lives more difficult and expensive as their desires to “change the world” collides with a healthy dose of reality…
Alternatively, this tends to prove the hypothesis that many in the Bay Area are actually kind of brain dead, even though they believe themselves smarter than everyone else…
Neanderthals
How can one state have so many ways to self destruct… next in line, ban the “wheel”.
No new gas stations? The next step will be to eliminate the existing gas stations just you watch. All in the name of “man made climate change” and “climate social justice” or something like that. Man made climate change is the biggest hoax the world has seen and REAL SCIENCE exposes that hoax. If you want proof of the climate change hoax visit: http://www.climatechangedispatch.com and cfact.org
Take a look at the homely bunch of Marxist authoritarian and totalitarian dictators on the Petaluma City Council:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/city-council/
How many of them received payoffs and bribes from “green energy” companies and the CCP?