Home>Articles>Victims of Crime Violated Once More by Faux Victims’ Groups

Patricia Wenskunas - Founder/CEO of Crime Survivors. (Photo: Crime Survivors/screen capture ABC7)

Victims of Crime Violated Once More by Faux Victims’ Groups

‘Crime victim advocates’ call for more inmate releases

By Patricia Wenskunas, May 12, 2020 4:38 pm

Special to California Globe by Patricia Wenskunas, Founder/CEO of Crime Survivors

Something happened a few weeks ago that crushed my soul like nothing I’ve ever experienced.  I don’t make a statement like that easily.  But in a million years I could never imagine what I witnessed could occur.  I spotted a headline in the Daily Journal, a Los Angeles-area legal newspaper, that read, “Crime Victim Advocates Call For More Inmate Releases, Services.”  There in black-and-white was a proclamation that was the very antithesis of what anyone who truly believes in helping victims of crime would ever say.

Incredibly…inexplicably, it seemed, was a shout-out to the world from someone I could only assume was a soldier in arms, calling for something that would negate all the hard-earned progress that crime victim advocates have made over the past several decades.

As it turned out, the article concerned the efforts of an organization called Crime Survivors for Safety and Justice, which shook me up once more.  I was very familiar with this group, whose name bore more than a passing resemblance to my own victims’ rights organization, “Crime Survivors.”  There were a couple of big differences, however.  First, I formed my group 17 years ago, while they had only been around since 2013.  That they should choose a name so similar to my organization’s seemed more than a coincidence.  It was as they were trying to deliberately mislead the public and create confusion between our two very different groups.

While Crime Survivors for Safety and Justice touts itself as being an advocate for victims of crime, they are actually far more concerned about the rights of criminal defendants.  Even their website intimates their thinly-veiled, soft-on-crime agenda by suggesting the organization and its staff embrace “creating a more humane criminal justice system” and that they “fight for policies that promote healing over retribution.”  One of its leaders was quoted in the Austin American-Statesman as saying, “We support common-sense changes to our criminal justice system that help break the cycle of crime and make our communities safer.”  They offer powerful support for perpetrators of violent crime.  As for the victims?  Not so much.

The mystery was solved, but the actions of Crime Survivors for Safety and Justice shouldn’t have surprised me.  My devastation stemmed from something else I noticed in the story.  One of the nation’s most reputable victim advocacy groups, the National Center for Victims of Crime (NCVC), was reported as being in support of releasing more inmates into our communities.  This time there was no mistaken identity involved.  An organization that has steadfastly supported victims for years had crossed the line to support convicted criminals.

As I read on, it wasn’t just NCVC, but other well-respected victims groups, including the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention and Still Standing Against Domestic Violence who were said to be in support of the wholesale release of inmates into our communities.  They claimed that rehabilitation and shorter sentences were what victims wanted, even citing a poll in support of the move.

The 180 degree reversal of these formerly honorable organizations is not only deeply disappointing, it is confounding.  The very foundation on which they were created has been turned on its ear for reasons that are equally mysterious.

There are many possible reasons why both public figures and organizations that are well-known for their principles may shift their stances.  As personally crushing as it is to me to see them abandon their values, along with the very people they promised to serve and defend, it only galvanizes me all the more to fight for what is right.

The purpose and mission of Crime Survivors — my original, authentic advocacy group — will never change.  We have operated on a shoestring budget with minimal salaries and limited staff to ensure that victims get their chance at justice.  Our values are not for sale and we will never sell out at any price.  While we fight for the abused, others can choose to fight for the abuser.  While we fight for the vulnerable, others can choose to fight for the bullies.  While we fight for the victim, others can choose to fight for criminals.

My soul may have been crushed, but it is resilient, just as all survivors must learn how to be.  The organizations and individuals behind them who have lost their way will face their own reckoning in due time.  In the meantime, I commit myself to fighting the good fight, and invite one and all to join me in working on behalf of the victims who often see us as their last hope.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Latest posts by Patricia Wenskunas (see all)
Spread the news:


2 thoughts on “Victims of Crime Violated Once More by Faux Victims’ Groups

  1. PW, am stunned by these actions you report. Victims need strong advocates for justice. I do support rational and humane treatment of convicted criminals not kids gloved sympathy for them. Granted, there are many incarcerated individuals who are not career criminals but people who did stupid/illegal things and are truly remorseful for their actions and is most likely NEVER commit any crime again. The criminal justice system must recognize these individuals and separate them from the career criminal whose only regret is getting caught. They work to get out of penal institutions in order to return to their criminal ways. Where are the people’s legislators on this problem? How do people identify legislators or candidates who really understand this problem and who will work for the people and victims more than for the violent offenders? I am sending your article to my representatives here in Minnesota. What Crime Survivors does and stands for is not vindictive. Rather I see it as an organization that stands for the rights and protections of victims over the manipulations of the justice system based on sympathy rather than justice. Again, this is not about inhumane treatment of prisoners. Keep up your work, Patricia. I certainly miss our working together. I think here in Minnesota we have a more reasonable and just system and hope we can be a model for all states. v

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *