Home>Articles>Mandatory Gender-Neutral Toy and Children’s Clothing Sections Proposed in New Bill

Assemblyman Evan Low (Kevin Sanders for California Globe)

Mandatory Gender-Neutral Toy and Children’s Clothing Sections Proposed in New Bill

AB 2826 would force large stores with 500 or more employees to separate sections based on gender

By Evan Symon, February 29, 2020 7:21 am

A new bill that would eliminate ‘boys’ and ‘girls’ toy and clothing sections in large stores in favor of a single gender-neutral section has been moved to a March Committee hearing this week.

Assembly Bill 2826, authored by Assemblyman Evan Low (D-Campbell), would specifically force stores with at least 500 employees to have one undivided aisle for child items. The bill specifically mentions toy and clothing aisles, although the bill can likely be applied to other sections.

Starting in 2023, stores that don’t comply with the proposed law would face as-of-yet undisclosed civil penalties.

Bill supporters have said gender segregated aisles for children makes it harder for shoppers to compare products and implies that one gender using something made for another gender is inappropriate.

A statement from Assemblyman Low’s office about AB 2826 goes into more detail, saying “Clothing and toys sections of department stores that are separated along gender lines pigeonhole children. No child should feel stigmatized for wearing a dinosaur shirt or playing with a Barbie doll.”

Assemblyman Low, who had previously authored the gender-neutral government language bill ACR 260 in 2018, also weighed in, giving his own personal reason for the bill.

“I was inspired to introduce this bill after 8-year-old Britten asked, ‘Why should a store tell me what a girl’s shirt or toy is?,” said Assemblymember Evan Low in a press release. “Her bill will help children express themselves freely and without bias. We need to let kids be kids.”

Meanwhile, some consumer groups have already come out in opposition to AB 2826.

“Toy aisles are fine since most stores already do that and most are for anyone anyway,” said consumer advocate Grace Wayne. “But many people are upset about clothing aisles. Children’s underwear is different for certain reason like adult underwear, and there are significant differences in clothing even at a younger age. It has nothing to do with clothes color or designs but more about shape and structure of it.”

“Some others I’ve talked to are outraged because they’re afraid that this could lead to a confused gender-identity, but many of us aren’t very much concerned about that. It’s more about how clothes is designed for each gender, even at a young age. Also, children that young may not be prepared to learn about certain parts of gender differences and other similar problems.”

“This shouldn’t even b a law since most stores already do this regardless. Give it 5 years and pretty much every store is going to combine aisles anyway.”

“And then, what about Amazon? They’re online in California and they separate. Do we do it to them too?”

“It’s not about challenging the freedom of expression, it’s teaching kids that different clothing for different genders has a purpose for each sex.”

AB 2826 is due to be heard in Committee in late March.

Evan Symon
Spread the news:
RELATED ARTICLES
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles National Local Riverside Legal Feature Legislature Governor
Sort by

Riverside County Issues Mandatory Mask Order

‘To begin with, you can argue first amendment violations’ with Church services stopped by local
April 6, 2020 1:52 pm

18

Federal Judge Temporarily Halts New Californian Mandatory Employee Arbitration Law

AB 51 faces stiff opposition from several Chambers of Commerce
January 3, 2020 12:32 pm

18

California’s ‘Brave New World:’ Gov. Newsom ‘Inclined’ to Back Mandatory School Vaccine Bill

SB 276 hijacking the practice of medicine, placing it into the hands of government ‘health clerks’ with no medical tr
August 9, 2019 2:34 pm

18

14 thoughts on “Mandatory Gender-Neutral Toy and Children’s Clothing Sections Proposed in New Bill

  1. This is pointless, useless, ridiculous, laughable, and a time-waster.
    Does this Evan Low person ever do anything useful up there in the state legislature?
    Is even his constituency on board with these nutty proposals?
    I’m beginning to think they are not. How could they be?

    1. God Help this state! Stop forcing your crazy ideology on children!!!! Vote these crazies out-of-office. I condemn this D Kevin Low from Campbell California – no less my stomping grounds.

      1. Kevin Low is one crazy, Chinese communist, homosexual, self important and typical CA democrat. The democratic carnage will be rampant in this state inside of 10 years. Democrats somehow think that no water, highest taxes in U.S., industry and people leaving by the thousands can be balanced out with $1,000 month free income, more regulation and open boarders. Prepare for implosion!

  2. We have a massive homeless problem in our state. Why aren’t they working to solve that problem instead of which I Barbie or GI Joe is on??? Who cares. These Government leaders have lost their minds!! Replace them with people with the ability to think clearly.

  3. This is a perfectly useless bill. Parents will choose how they want to dress their children and what toys they want to have, so whether or not clothing and toys are all lumped together in one area will not change anything in terms of purchasing habits. Let those parents who want to be gender-neutral Simply choose what they like. Let those parents who want to use traditional clothing and traditional toys buy what they want. Let kids who have preferences which may well fit into stereotypes get the toys they want. People will buy what they want; let the law of supply and demand decide these things.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *