Home>Articles>Sacramento Homeless Transients Take Over Vacant Home In Stunt by ‘Tenants Union’

Katie Valenzuela. (Photo: Katie4council)

Sacramento Homeless Transients Take Over Vacant Home In Stunt by ‘Tenants Union’

Sacramento transients and activists copycat the Oakland squatters stunt, in a home owned by the same investment group

By Katy Grimes, April 2, 2020 7:58 am

‘This has become a moral obligation, so if that means breaking legal law, we must do what we need to.’

 

In what appears to be a staged stunt in Sacramento, a group of transients broke into a Land Park neighborhood home over the weekend, which was in the process of being renovated, and stayed there illegally until Sacramento Police Department officers arrived to remove them Sunday. While this was going on, an activist group, Sacramento Tenants Union, filmed them and then pushed it out on social media.

Twitter post, Katie Valenzuela. (Photo: Screen capture Twitter)

The Sacramento Tenants Union says, “Housing is a human right. Solidarity is key.”

The Sacramento transients and activists pulled a copycat stunt, similar to the recent Oakland squatters takeover of a vacant home however, the Sacramento home is coincidentally owned by the same investment group as the Oakland home.

Coming off a big Sacramento City Council election upset, Katie Valenzuela, who will take office in December, was asked about this on Twitter, admitted she was in full support of this “silent protest” comparing it to civil rights movements in the past. “This was a coordinated effort,” she said in a Tweet.

Twitter thread, Katie Valenzuela, Nate Affleck. (Photo: Screen capture Twitter)

Valenzuela said the only circumstances where transients shouldn’t illegally take over someone’s home is if the homeowner is sick or on vacation.

“I think Oakland gave us a blueprint we could easily follow,” Valenzuela told the Sacramento Bee. Valenzuela is on the board of the Sacramento Community Land Trust. “Under the ‘land trust’ model, homeowners agree to sell homes to lower-income families at a pre-determined price, instead of listing them on the open market.”

The mission of Sacramento Community Land Trust: “SacCLT prevents displacement and builds historically discriminated neighborhood power to combat deterioration and market speculation by fostering equitable development for generations to come.”

“SacCLT is a vehicle fighting to sustain and strengthen historically discriminated neighborhoods using a transparent, accountable shared governance model to drive a sustainable, equitable, and empowered Sacramento metro area.”

“These people will probably be going right back there and this time it’s gonna be a community activity event and a political statement and not just an act of a few desperate people,” said civil rights attorney Mark Merin, the Bee reported. “I think what we’re gonna see here is an escalation of a move to take over abandoned dwellings, especially those that are corporate-owned as this one was.”

Activist Sacramento Attorney Mark Merin has repeatedly sued the City of Sacramento and Sacramento Police Department on behalf of homeless transients and Black Lives Matter. He was a big supporter of Valenzuela during her campaign for election to city council.

“Crystal Sanchez, an activist and president of the Sacramento Homeless Union, said she believes more homeless people will move into corporate or publicly-owned vacant houses in the city as the pandemic continues,” the Bee reported. “Yes, they will move into a safe unused space,” Sanchez said. “At a time when precaution, protection and safety is key, we must do what we have to to survive this pandemic. This has become a moral obligation, so if that means breaking legal law, we must do what we need to.”

Be sure to read the Sacramento Homeless Union list of demands in a letter sent to elected lawmakers throughout California.

Demand #1 is notable: “Single or family occupancy housing; immediately provide and a list of all city-owned, county-owned and tax-delinquent properties where vacant units exist into which the homeless may be
allowed to immediately occupy as a winter emergency; No mass shelter; No compelled
‘shelter.’ Full Constitutional rights for all those in the shelter system including speech, right to
organize, freedom of movement and association and the provision of adequate food, clothing
and humane treatment.”

Twitter thread, Katie Valenzuela, Nate Affleck. (Photo: Screen capture Twitter)

 

Twitter thread, Katie Valenzuela, Nate Affleck. (Photo: Screen capture Twitter)

 

Twitter thread, Katie Valenzuela, Nate Affleck. (Photo: Screen capture Twitter)

 

 

Twitter thread, Katie Valenzuela, Nate Affleck. (Photo: Screen capture Twitter)

 

 

 

Spread the news:
RELATED ARTICLES
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles Local Sacramento Governor
Sort by

Sacramento Mayor Steinberg Calls for Repeal of Old City Ordinance to Stand, Salute During National Anthem

A lawsuit in search of a problem facilitated the repeal
July 8, 2020 7:34 am

18

Assembly Offices Close In Sacramento Following 5 New Coronavirus Cases

Assemblywoman Autumn Burke among those who have contracted COVID-19
July 6, 2020 4:56 pm

18

Sacramento Sheriff Scott Jones Refuses to Enforce Gov. Newsom’s Mask Order

‘It would be inappropriate for deputies to criminally enforce the Governor’s mandate’
June 19, 2020 6:35 pm

18

9 thoughts on “Sacramento Homeless Transients Take Over Vacant Home In Stunt by ‘Tenants Union’

  1. Would love to have someone show where in the United States Constitution or The Bill Of Rights where is says housing is a human right. Anyone?

  2. Gee, property rights don’t seem to matter to these people at all. But the right to kill a baby is no problem at all. Really curious set of values….

  3. So if a squatter opts to trespass, break in to, and live in an unoccupied house, who pays the bills for water, gas, electricity?

    1. Apparently the taxpayer. Read about “Reclaiming our Homes” in Los Angeles where the “Reclaimers” broke into 13 vacant homes owned by Caltrans and sent a letter to the Governor demanding the utilities be turned on. After three weeks the squatters still remain, but at least one thanked the taxpayers, “We’re humbled to have you the taxpayers welcome us into your home, which is now my home and my families home…”. At least Sacramento law enforcement took action. Not so in Los Angeles where law enforcement was directed to stand down resulting in several homes being broken into and illegally occupied.

    2. Apparently the taxpayer. Read about “Reclaiming our Homes” in Los Angeles where the “Reclaimers” broke into 13 vacant homes owned by Caltrans and sent a letter to the Governor demanding the utilities be turned on. After three weeks the squatters still remain, but at least one thanked the taxpayers, “We’re humbled to have you the taxpayers welcome us into your home, which is now my home and my family’s home…”. At least Sacramento law enforcement took action. Not so in Los Angeles where law enforcement was directed to stand down resulting in several homes being broken into and illegally occupied.

  4. Trespass, vandalism and theft, along with conspiracy to commit those, and maybe burglary if the vandalism is enough to warrant a felony claim? Civil torts of conversion, probable destruction of property. Ms. Valenzuela as much as admits the conspiracy crime. In any sane state, they would throw the book at these people to 1) defend private property rights which is properly one of the primary functions of government , and 2) make a useful example to others who want to pull this same stunt.

  5. I see an amazingly coincidental series of ‘electrical fires’ breaking out. If I’m going to have my property stolen, what is my motivation for NOT destroying it?

  6. Why should a property owner go on paying property tax if the government those property taxes are going to doesn’t recognize property rights of the tax payer.

    This woman is literally advocating taxation without representation.

    She deserves to be recalled immediately.

  7. Ms. Valenzuela has obviously never been a landlord. So, if you are in between tenants, homeless people get to break into your home, ruin it, and stay there how long? These people are trespassers, breaking and entering, and should be in jail. That is all society “owes” them!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *