On February 18, Assemblyman James Gallagher introduced Assembly Bill 1114 dealing with social media platforms and concerns that some are closed out by social media. The bill would add Title 15 (commencing with Section 3200) to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code. Title 15.5 would be titled “Social Media Platforms.”
First, the bill would specify that a social media platform located in California will be considered a limited public form as described in the U.S. Supreme Court’s case of PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robbins (1980) 447 U.S. 74. Second, the bill provides definitions of two terms used in the measure.
The phrase “located in California” is defined as, to the extent consistent with federal law, either the person operating the social media platform maintains a business in California, or the user of that platform is located in California.
And, the term “social media platform” is defined as an electronic service held open to the general public to post electronic content or communication, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, or messages, intended to facilitate the sharing of information, ideas, personal messages, and other content. Social media platform does not include a platform operated by a local, state, or federal entity or agency of government.
The bill is expected to be heard in its first policy committee in March.
- Underground Regulations and California’s Administrative Procedure Act - October 28, 2021
- Determining Whether Agency Action Is a Regulation - October 27, 2021
- Emergency Regulations Under the APA - October 26, 2021