Home>Articles>Proposed Bill Prohibiting Nondisclosure Agreements

Sen. Connie M. Leyva. (Photo: Kevin Sanders for California Globe)

Proposed Bill Prohibiting Nondisclosure Agreements

SB 331 would prohibit an employer from requiring an employee to sign a non-disparagement agreement

By Chris Micheli, February 9, 2021 9:31 am

Senator Connie Leyva introduced Senate Bill 331 Monday February 8th, to expand existing law on settlement and non-disparagement agreement. The bill would amend Section 1001 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 12964.5 of the Government Code. Existing law prohibits a settlement agreement from preventing the disclosure of information in sexual assault and sexual harassment cases.

SB 331 would expand the prohibition contained in existing law to include acts of workplace harassment or discrimination not based on sex and an act of harassment or discrimination not based on sex by the owner of a housing accommodation. In addition, under the state’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) prohibits various actions as unlawful employment practices unless the employer acts based upon a bona fide occupational qualification or applicable security regulations.

SB 331 would prohibit an employer from requiring an employee to sign a non-disparagement agreement or other document to the extent it has the purpose or effect of denying the employee the right to disclose information about prohibited acts. The bill would provide that any provision in violation of that prohibition would be against public policy and unenforceable.

Section One of the bill would amend Civil Code Section 1001. Existing law would be amended to specify that any non-disclosure provisions that “prevent or restrict” (by adding the term restrict) the disclosure of factual information is prohibited. It would also strike the limitation on “discrimination based on sex” and apply to all discrimination cases.

Section Two of the bill would amend Government Code Section 12964.5 to prevent an employer from requiring an employee to sign an agreement or document “to the extent it has the purpose or effect of denying the employee the right to disclose information about unlawful acts in the workplace.”

In addition, FEHA would be amended to provide that “It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer or former employer to include in any agreement related to an employee’s separation from employment any provision to the extent it has the purpose or effect of denying the employee or former employee the right to disclose information about unlawful acts in the workplace.”

Such an agreement would be against public policy and unenforceable. Finally, the phrase “information about unlawful acts in the workplace” would be defined to include information pertaining to harassment or discrimination or any other unlawful or potentially unlawful conduct.

SB 331 is expected to be heard in its first policy committee in late March.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

3 thoughts on “Proposed Bill Prohibiting Nondisclosure Agreements

  1. This is Insane!!!
    They need to Stop all this Control and Rights on Employees!! In California we already don’t have many Rights and we can be Fired at Will.
    Statement:
    Finally, the phrase “information about unlawful acts in the workplace” would be defined to include information pertaining to harassment or discrimination or any other unlawful or potentially unlawful conduct.

  2. I actually agree with this. One of the problems in California is it is very difficult to win qui tam lawsuits and many attorneys won’t take them – at least for the intended purposes of the California False Claims Act. We have some real corrupt companies in this state – especially nonprofits. The more transparency, the better, IMHO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.