Home>Articles>New Study: ‘California’s High Gas Prices and Supply Dilemmas are Self-Inflicted’

Oil pumpjack, San Benito County. (Photo: Katy Grimes for California Globe)

New Study: ‘California’s High Gas Prices and Supply Dilemmas are Self-Inflicted’

California’s oil and gas industry contributes $166 billion of economic activity to California’s Gross State Product

By Katy Grimes, March 18, 2025 1:42 pm

A new study by USC Professor Michael Mische found that the factors which have contributed to California’s high gasoline prices over 50-years are self-imposed by state officials and politicians. It turns out that California is its own worst enemy.

Today, I paid $5.15 per gallon of gas in Sacramento, while the AAA national average is $3.078. In Texas today, a gallon of gas will cost you $2.45 to $3.29 – the average in Texas is $2.68. As Professor Mische notes in his study, “Since January 1995 through January 20, 2025, Californians have been paying, on average, 13.1% more for their gasoline than the rest of the nation. Not surprisingly, the average price of retail gasoline in California on March 11, 2025, was $4.694 a gallon, or 52.35% higher per gallon for all formulations than the national average price for gasoline at $3.081, according to AAA.”

It is no secret that California is its own worst enemy. There have been articles exposing this for decades, and now we have 50 years of irrefutable data thanks to Professor Mische. Oil and gas and California refiners “have not engaged in widespread price gouging, profiteering, price manipulation, ‘unexplained residual prices’ or surcharges, magical or otherwise.”

However, Governor Gavin Newsom, who is currently preoccupied with his new vanity podcast may want to consider talking to oil and gas industry officials – something he has failed to do in his 6 years as California’s governor.

There is no excuse for Newsom’s negligence of an industry which is an economic powerhouse in the state, providing hundreds of thousands of jobs, over $50 million in paychecks to workers, and billions in state, local and federal taxes.

The oil and gas industry contributes hundreds of billions of dollars to the state’s economy and Gavin Newsom won’t talk to them. Instead Newsom is regulating the viability out of California’s oil and gas industry.

While Newsom prioritizes climate change schemes at the expense of the oil and gas industry, a timely report by the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC) report reveals the significant role oil and gas plays in California’s economy.

The report found that:

  • Across California, the oil and gas industry supports 536,770 jobs, generates $53 billion in labor income, and contributes $166 billion of economic activity to California’s Gross State Product (GSP).
  • Additionally, it generates $47.9 billion in state and local taxes and $16.3 billion in federal taxes.

The oil and gas industry is an economic powerhouse, and Gov. Newsom and his handlers want to shut it down and run it out of the state.

Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation reports that “the oil and gas industry contributes hundreds of billions of dollars to the state’s economy. This economic activity supports critical public programs such as health care, public safety, and education.” 

These factors are crucial to consider as the state continues to push for policies that advance the energy transition, especially with programs like Medi-Cal being underfunded.

Professor Michael Mische offers the following conclusions in his study on 30 to 50 years of data on California’s high gas prices:

“…the primary conclusion from this study is that California’s high gasoline prices and supply dilemmas are, by design, engineering or serendipitously, largely self-inflicted, and the result of directed policies and a litany of regulations, taxes, fees, and costs. The economic evidence is abundant; California refiners have not engaged in widespread price gouging, profiteering, price manipulation, “unexplained residual prices” or surcharges, magical or otherwise. The Golden State’s gasoline price dilemma is the result of the complex interactions regulatory and political policies, and the subtleties of refinery operations and global crude oil prices and in-state centric supply and demand. Specifically, California’s high gasoline prices can be attributed to:

  1. Aggressive environmental policies, which are layered on the oil and gas industry, add costs throughout the petroleum supply chain resulting in higher retail gasoline prices.
  2. Costly reporting and compliance to regulatory and environmental mandates are added to the retail price of gasoline, including California’s special blend gasoline requirements, the highest state excise tax in the U.S., as well as growing cap and trade costs, local taxes, and other environmental program costs, thereby increasing consumer prices at the pump.
  3. In-state business general operating and refinery costs are which are considerably higher in California than across the U.S., are reflected in the retail price of gasoline.
  4. Declining in-state oil production and increasingly greater reliance on foreign sourced imports and exposure to geopolitical conditions contribute to supply concerns and retail price volatility.
  5. Refinery gasoline production, which is decreasing at a faster rate than gasoline consumption, creates stresses on supply gasoline stocks, thereby contributing to higher consumer prices.
  6. Increasingly higher taxes and policy and regulatory costs, such as cap and trade, gasoline inventories, and the LCFS,  which are influencing the exit of refiners from the Golden State adding to supply stresses, and price volatility, influence retailing pricing strategies by operators.
  7. General disincentives associated with Governor Newsom’s mandate and California Air Resource Board’s (CARB) 2035 objective to eliminate internal combustion vehicles (ICV) in favor of zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) as a method to force consumer adoption of ZEVs through gasoline costs serve to dissuade new operators from entering the California market and motivate existing ones to exit.

“With 2035 less than a decade away, there is no incentive for or benefit to California oil producers or refiners to invest in additional capacity or capital improvements in the Golden State,” Professor Mische writes. “Ultimately, with the potential for the loss of two or more major refineries, combined with new special blend gasoline standards (LCFS) and the new finished gasoline stock inventory requirements, Californians are inevitably facing escalating gasoline prices at the retail pump, and most likely, increased taxes and fees to compensate for lost gasoline and cap and trade revenues.”

“According to California’s own Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), greenhouse emissions policies have contributed to the second highest monthly electricity rates for residential service in the U.S.,” Prof. Mische says. “For the 2019 to 2024 period, the LAO reports that residential electrical utility rates in California increased by 47%. In the Golden State, Californians monthly utility bills average $438.”

California oil imports from petrostates such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq have increased significantly, as a consequence of declining in-state oil production, because of Gov. Newsom’s and Democrats’ in the State Legislature’s aggressive anti-oil policies.

Prof. Mische says California is highly dependent on oil imports from Iraq (21.26%), Brazil (20.41%), Guyana (15.80%), and Ecuador (13.60%).

Is anyone surprised when we have lawmakers like State Senator Scott Wiener authoring legislation which will hold “Big Oil” responsible for natural disasters in California. And in doing so, he will allow insurance companies and victims of fires, floods, rain and sleet, wind events, mudslides, and earthquakes to sue fossil fuel companies for damages.

In 1982, California imported 5.6% its crude oil from foreign sources. In 2024, the Golden State imported 60.7% of its oil from foreign sources, largely because of open hostility from the Newsom administration and demented lawmakers like Senator Wiener.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

18 thoughts on “New Study: ‘California’s High Gas Prices and Supply Dilemmas are Self-Inflicted’

  1. Another tax payer funded “study” by an academic telling us what we have all known for decades. I guess you have to be really “educated” to discover such elusive truths. 😉 I wonder what this cost us? DOGE it!

  2. How disgusting is this governor-created situation we are unnecessarily in, a suffocation that makes NO SENSE whatsoever of a vital CA industry, as go-along Wiener’s nonsense also makes NO SENSE whatsoever, that has the state not receiving piles of needed tax revenue that it could otherwise take in and apply to a beyond-broke California, which broke California is also Newsom’s doing, further breaking the backs of already-struggling CA residents?
    Worst of all is that we know NEWSOM KNOWS he has always spewed lies about this and his fake climate change crap, and we know that he is well aware —– because how can he not be when he is reminded of it every two seconds —- he is further harming the people of this state, that he doesn’t care and probably even enjoys crushing the state and the people in it.
    Isn’t it telling that this governor has NO IDEA how to even plausibly PRETEND to moderate himself in his doomed quest to set himself up to be a Prez candidate?

  3. When I was young there were pump jacks in operation all over the state. It has been decades since I have seen one. As far as I know the oil is still there but you can’t pump it due to state regs.

  4. The headline should instead be “New Study: California’s High Gas Prices and Supply Dilemmas are DEMOCRAT-Inflicted.” Maybe it’s time that beleaguered Californians held Democrat lawmakers like Gov. Gavin “Hair-gel Hitler” Newsom and State Senator Scott “creepy pedo” Wiener responsible for destroying the once great state of California with their loony legislation that only benefits them and their deep state globalist cronies?

    1. LOL. California has astronomical electricity prices. Last I heard EV’s are more costly to drive than gas cars.

        1. So you can be like my neighbors, who virtue-signaled their way into TWO Teslas, PLUS a $60,000 rooftop solar panel installation…
          They ditched BOTH of the Teslas because they got sick of having range anxiety AND concerns about resale value, but the rooftop solar remains in place…along with the payments….
          Please don’t vote, Earl, we don’t need more of your kind making decisions for the rest of us…

          1. The Tesla is an excellent car, because it made Elon Musk the wealthiest man in the world.

        2. Well that makes sense, says nobody who has researched and lived with solar.
          On the surface it sounds easy.
          Solar is expensive to install and not consistent especially during the winter.
          It takes on average 7 to 10 years to recoup your investment in solar energy!
          No sun, no power. This results in low battery storage!
          I should know, I have solar. Great in the summer but sucks in the winter!
          Let’s also take into consideration most residents in this state are renters.
          Thank you climate loonies who killed suburbia and traded it for sustainable stack and packs! In my area one of those 1 bedroom units rent for $3,600.00 with an intimate view of the freeway! You can sit in your living room and watch all the Teslas go by!
          That simplified answer of “just get an EV” is in my opinion elitist and a very similar response to which the last administration advised fired pipeline workers to learn to code!
          EV cars are costly and burn through tires because of the excessive weight.

          I agree this travesty is self inflicted. Newsom’s post above is laughable. He actually thinks people are not economically impacted by “climate change” policies!
          Another out of touch elitist politician!

    2. Says the person who didn’t even read the article. And it’s such an elitist comment. Only the very well to do can afford the upfront costs of an EV and the ever-increasing electric rates for charging them. This is a prime example of how brainwashed the typical California voter is. They actually believe the lie that “Big Oil” is “ripping” off people in California (and only California for some reason) while ignoring the fact that it’s actually the state government that is ripping off its own people with massive taxes and fees. It’s because of them that our state is a complete disaster and only getting worse.

    3. Democrat leftist thugs are attacking Tesla EVs in a crazy attempt to stop Elon Musk and DOGE from exposing their grift and graft.

      1. One week after Infowars reporter Jamie White was murdered outside of his Austin apartment, followed by a pizza delivery under the name of ‘Jamie White,’ Infowars’ host Owen Shroyer was swatted as conservatives continue to be targeted. Shroyer’s swatting is not an isolated incident – as numerous conservatives have been targeted in recent weeks with similar swattings. “It’s been dozens of people that have been swatted. What is going on? We know what’s going on,” said Shroyer. “The Democrat Party and all of their little street thugs funded by ActBlue, the stolen money from USAID, George Soros—all these different groups are behind it. They’re behind the terror attacks against Elon Musk.”

        Shroyer posted pictures and footage of the swatting on X: (https://x.com/OwenShroyer1776/status/1902216524808462564)

    4. hahaha! My brother in law made it big in the solar industry. Over a decade they had 3 expensive Teslas, Solar and Tesla batteries all over the garage walls. Then, the Tesla’s staring being sold back. He quietly got rid of them and the family knew that with the electricity prices and payments, it wasn’t even close to penciling out! I said then, that this was just the tip of the iceberg. Fast forward and his business is in the toilet! CA, even put the solar guys under with their electric policies. The people running this state are horribly incompetent or corrupt or both!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *