Home>Articles>California Assembly Members Compelled to Show Proof of COVID Vaccine or Lose Salary, New Legislation Says

Assemblyman Marc Levine. (Photo: Kevin Sanders for California Globe)

California Assembly Members Compelled to Show Proof of COVID Vaccine or Lose Salary, New Legislation Says

Introduced late Wednesday evening, House Resolution 71 calls for proof of vaccine or forfeit salary, benefits

By Katy Grimes, August 26, 2021 9:33 am

A House Resolution introduced late Wednesday evening in the California State Assembly would compel  members of the Assembly to provide proof of a COVID vaccine or “else the Member shall be suspended from exercising the powers of the office, and shall forfeit all salary and benefits derived from the office, until the Member has presented evidence of having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccination or evidence of a disability or medical condition that prevents the Member from receiving the COVID-19 vaccination.”

How does the Assembly demand proof of a vaccine or order that another member’s salary and benefits be forfeited if that member was elected by voters?

“This seems like it disenfranchises millions of voters who voted for these people,” a Capitol source commented to the Globe. “Is this voter suppression?”

Is this even Constitutional?

While this is a resolution which is not officially enforceable, a resolution is often used ahead of controversial legislation to ease legislators into the concept.

Here is the bill’s language:

HR 71, as introduced, by Assemblyman Marc Levine (D-San Rafael)



WHEREAS, The COVID-19 pandemic, including the Delta variant of the COVID-19 virus, continues to infect Californians at an alarming rate; and

WHEREAS, Vaccination against COVID-19 significantly reduces an individual’s ability to contract and transmit the virus; and

WHEREAS, Members of the Assembly are compelled to work together in close quarters where contraction of the virus is more likely; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That a Member of the Assembly shall present evidence that the Member has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccination, or shall present evidence of a disability or medical condition that prevents the Member from receiving the COVID-19 vaccination, by September 1, 2021, or else the Member shall be suspended from exercising the powers of the office, and shall forfeit all salary and benefits derived from the office, until the Member has presented evidence of having received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccination or evidence of a disability or medical condition that prevents the Member from receiving the COVID-19 vaccination; and be it further

Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.

The Globe will follow up on new developments on this resolution.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:


21 thoughts on “California Assembly Members Compelled to Show Proof of COVID Vaccine or Lose Salary, New Legislation Says

  1. At this rate with all of these unconstitutional mandates coming out of D.C. and Sacramento based on “case” rates, I will pass on from a heart attack or stroke before the Wuhan virus!
    Geez, may I remind everyone if you are healthy and under the age of 70 you have a 99..8%, survivability rate.
    Again this is not about health or there would be consideration for early treatment and acknowledgement for acquired natural immunity that is strong and robust.

  2. I’m thinking that whoever you cause to panic about their livelihood —- whether legislator or not —- will likely get vaccinated and, because they are vaccinated, will become more invested in getting everyone else vaccinated. Didn’t we study this in Psychology 101? Wasn’t it the Milgram Experiment? (Will have to look that up.) That helps the Us vs. Them movement afoot, and furthers the goal of “Them.”

    1. Brilliant observation!
      Funny you bring that up, because family members who once said it is your choice are now demanding that those that have yet to be vaccinated do it now!
      That was my first thought to justify their decision, they need others to do the same!
      Thanks for the link!

      1. Cali Girl, just between you and me (ha ha) I think the powers are trying to get as many people as possible to panic and get the vaccine even though they know their whole enterprise is a very questionable one that is not “sustainable.” Just more scaremongering to get as many people as possible vaccinated! (And then those vaccinated people will go around nagging those in their social circle. Agh.) But I’m probably telling you something you already know. 🙂

    2. No way its my body my choice I have autoimmune disease and had cancer in 2019 I am not or will not be fear mongering into taking a bioweapon that does not protect a person it’s an experimental jab its not a vaccine and no one will intimidate me or threaten me I will take it as I am being assaulted . How dare the government tell me how or what goes into my body I was already injured by a big pharma medication that caused me to get thyroid cancer and they even stated that victoza can cause thyroid cancer and I addressed it to my doctors and was blown off ,so keep your bioweapon and jab yourself with all you want jabs its my life my body my choice .

  3. Enough is enough. It was 15 days to flatten the curve. We’re in 525+ plus days now of ridiculous, tyrannical demands. Time to stop complying. These people are insane. They actually think they are a right to YOUR body. Even more crazy are the dumb slaves who think the government should have jurisdiction over YOUR body. It’s time to stand up LIKE REAL AMERICANS and stop complying with tyranny. You are an egotistical fool if you think you can control viruses. You cannot. They will always be here. It may seem so virtuous to vaccinate yourself against about 10 viruses, but there’s still thousands of other viruses, bacteria and fungi you can be exposed to that can kill you and others around you. What WILL FOR SURE kill you and your spirit are these communist regulations. You need to stop complying NOW or what little freedoms you have will be no more. Rise!

    1. I’m not in favor of this mandate, but I don’t agree with you at all. Let’s see – who was the first American to mandate a vaccine? Oh yeah, it was George Washington. Was he a real American or a “communist”? And yes, that was the smallpox *virus*. I’d say we have it under control, like a host of other viruses.

  4. Here we go again – the NorCal fear brigade is executing the marching orders from Washington & Davos & beyond….

    All of these mandates are an attempt to force the unjabbed from NOT experiencing the virus, while the JABBED experience the side-effects and virus cases, and the MSM gaslights the situation by reporting the UNtruth…

    They want to remove the “control group” that’s not experiencing the clot-shot side effects or illnesses….

  5. The California Department of Public Health has admitted that they have NO documentation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus being isolated in a human being.

    RE: Public Records Reference # P013534-081321
    Dear Walker Whelan:
    On August 13, 2021, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) received your request for records under the Public Records Act (PRA) wherein you requested the following:

    ” The CDPH (California Department of Public Heath) must provide by request all white papers describing the isolation of the COVID-19 aka SARS-CoV-2 virus in human beings, directly from a sample taken from a diseased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material. Note: The word “isolate” indicates: a thing is separated from all other material surrounding It. I am not requesting white papers where “isolation” of SARS-CoV-2 refers to: the culturing of something, or- the performance of an amplification test (PCR), or – the sequencing of something. To clarify I am requesting via disclosure all white papers showing Isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in human beings in your possession or in the possession of CDPA, as these white papers would have been integral in the crafting of the statutes made under the “Public Health Act” here In California.”

    CDPH has completed a diligent search and has determined that it is not in possession of records that are responsive to your request. For this reason, this concludes CDPH’s response to your request, which will now be closed.
    Taylor St. Mary

    1. The standard referred to in this request is not the standard for isolation of a virus, it is the standard used for isolation of a bacteria. This may be a real request (I have no idea), but it is a faulty premise, and the response proves nothing. COVID-19 was isolated within days after health authorities became aware of. Feel free to continue on ignorance of how science actually works, but this has been debunked so many times that it’s getting silly.

      1. It hasn’t been isolated or purified. In January 2021, the head of the Chinese CDC said they never isolated a virus. In December 2020, the CDC mentioned they had no reference standard meaning they can’t validate tests against actual infectious particles taken in vivo. If you have a true infectious virus, you are going to see real viremia and get enough particles you can spin them in a sucrose (or potassium tartarate or cesium chloride) gradient and have them band at the 1.16 g/ml level characteristic of budding enveloped viruses and then observe them using transmission electron microscopy possibly with an observable plaque – the first time they did this was with Yellow Fever in 1939. They were doing this in the 1950’s for real viruses and you can read about it in Berton Rouche’s annals of epidemiology. From the purified sample you then take take out the genetic material and from that you know that the genome you are sequencing (sanger sequencing) is taken from a particle with the morphology of an infectious virus. THIS IS THE CRITICAL STEP, and it has not been done – as was confirmed by Jeffrey Calisher as interviewed by Torsten Engelbrecht last year. Even then, you don’t have proof that the particle you are observing is the probable cause of a disease – from that, you take the purified particles, grow them in culture, and then use that culture to construct an animal model. Sometimes it’s not possible to grow them in culture especially when you have differentiated cells (as in the hepatitis viruses A and B … but not C which has never been proven to exist, actually).

        What they did was a faulty technique called nextgen sequencing – but it’s totally bogus. In the paper “Sequence Based Microbial Identification of Pathogens” [1] (which refers to molecular techniques), the authors wrote, “With only amplified sequences available, the the biological role OR EVEN THE EXISTENCE of these INFERRED microorganisms remains unclear.” The pathogen is inferred in this process against a template created by Corman Drosten in 2003, and the problem is GenBank censors submissions of human genome fragments created through retrotransposons thought to be exogenous, but it’s only so because Corman Drosten put it there. They’ve since found everything in Corona is normal human genome – sort of ticky-tacked together by a computer. It’s molecular voodoo that does NOT prove the existence of a pathogen.

        1. Fredericks DN, Relman DA. Sequence-based identification of microbial pathogens: a reconsideration of Koch’s postulates. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996. 9:18-33.

    1. Almost the entire California legislature are fascio-communist authoritarian scumbags… minus a few of the Republicans. This is coming from someone who was a card carrying liberal until March of 2020.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *