Home>Articles>The Greenberg Brief: Gloves Off – SF’s Democratic Party Leadership Battle

San Francisco from San Francisco Headlands and Golden Gate bridge, San Francisco, CA. (Photo: Kropic1/Shutterstock)

The Greenberg Brief: Gloves Off – SF’s Democratic Party Leadership Battle

It’s up to the voters to elect moderate Democrats March 5th

By Richie Greenberg, January 21, 2024 2:41 pm

The twenty-four-seat committee which is tasked with running the city’s Democratic party is going to change, fingers crossed, for the better. If you are a registered Democrat, you can (and should) make your voice heard and vote to move your local party leadership forward.

It works like this: San Francisco is split into two representative districts (AD, or Assembly Districts), roughly east and west sides of the city. These are different from the supervisorial districts you may know. The district lines superimpose over Matt Haney’s (east) and Phil Ting’s (west) jurisdictions, if you are familiar with them serving as your representatives at the CA State Assembly in Sacramento.

The east side of San Francisco makes up AD17 with fourteen seats; The Richmond District and Sunset Districts largely make up AD19 on the west, where there are ten seats on the Democratic Party leadership committee, known as the SF DCCC, opening this March for a 4-year term. You, as a registered Democrat, get to choose who to put there, depending in which AD you live.

Who should you choose? Rather than laboriously searching for bios and experiences for each candidate, they’ve made things fairly easy for you: They’ve coalesced into two similar-minded, similar-ideological groups. There’s the far-left leaning ideology, and the moderate/centrist ideology. The fight is on.

Please keep in mind this SF DCCC election is for registered Democrats. Republicans have their own similar election for their local party leaders (the SF RCCC or SFGOP as its usually referred to). Only registered Republicans vote in their contest. Voters can’t cross party lines in these specific leadership elections.

Looking at the Democrats, it helps to have recent incidents and events from past years as reference. Remember the rabid chanting of “F&%ck the POA” the evening notorious DA Chesa Boudin won his election, November 2019? That foul and anti-law enforcement chant was led by Sandra Lee Fewer, now a current SF DCCC candidate. And so many in the Richmond District are disgusted with current supervisor Connie Chan. Both Fewer and Chan are running on one of the slates known as “Labor & Working Families Slate”, on line at www.sflwf.com . They are joined by Gordon Mar, ousted ultra-Progressive of the Sunset/District 4. John Avalos and Jane Kim are part of this slate as well. If these people turn you off, then you know that Labor & Working Families Slate is not for you.

The SF Democrats for Change Slate is the alternative www.sfdemocratsforchange.org. Marjan Philhour, Catherine Stefani, Michela Alioto-Pier, Matt Dorsey, Nancy Tung and others are on this slate.

These two slates are not set in stone. They are alliances, groups of democrats aligned by principles and outlook for the city, and you can pick and choose from either list. Mix and match if you so wish.

Notorious, ranked choice voting (RCV) does not come into play with the party committee elections. On the west side, there are ten seats and yet double the number of candidates. There are fourteen on the east. You choose up to fourteen on the east side or ten for the city’s west side. Those which accumulate the most votes win and fill those seats. The rest drop off, eliminated.

Why does this even matter? Control of the Democratic Party matters. They provide all-important endorsements, recommendations to voters how to vote on ballot measures, candidates, sending mailers to your home. Also, they create resolutions at their monthly meetings which are often relayed to the Board of Supervisors in City Hall. The party leadership also serves as a megaphone for public relations and marketing on important stories in the news of a political bent.

Recent concerns with the current DCCC’s party leadership committee include opposing the recall of three SFUSD School Board members as well as opposing the recall of DA Chesa Boudin. They endorsed John Hamasaki, the wildly unqualified and maliciously anti-law and order candidate who ran against our current DA Brooke Jenkins. They supported Dean Preston and Hillary Ronen for Supervisor.

These are serious times with serious implications for local party control. Vote wisely. Change is needed, to get respectable, responsible people in office.  This is no time for a popularity contest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

2 thoughts on “The Greenberg Brief: Gloves Off – SF’s Democratic Party Leadership Battle

  1. Just what we need. Recommendations from a right wing Republican on how Democrats should vote in the election for the DCCC (which is only for registered Democrats). I can think of no better endorsement for the Labor and Working Families slates for AD 17 and AD 19, than to have Ritchie Greenberg lobbying against them.

    1. Just what the once great city of San Francisco does NOT need is more radical far leftist Democrat politicians who live like royalty while pretending to be for “labor and working families” while doing everything they can to make it impossible for them to live in the City and making it more of a crime infested hellhole than it already is?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *