Home>Articles>Hilton-Romero Propose 3-Year Degrees & Freeze Tuition

Hilton-Romero Propose 3-Year Degrees & Freeze Tuition

‘After 15 years of one-party rule, California’s public colleges have become more expensive, more bureaucratic, and students are stuck waiting for classes they need to graduate’

By Katy Grimes, March 20, 2026 11:35 am

Steve Hilton & Gloria Romero. (Photo: stevehiltonforgovernor.com)

Gubernatorial Candidate Steve Hilton and Lt. Gov. Candidate Gloria Romero have proposed a plan to make the California’s public colleges affordable again.

Hilton argues that under prolonged Democratic one-party rule, University of California, California State University, and California Community Colleges have become far too expensive due to rising tuition, administrative bloat, waste, falling standards, and inefficiencies like prolonged degree timelines and transfer issues.

California’s public colleges were supposed to be a ladder up, Hilton says. But for too many families, they have become just another cost trap driven by rising tuition and outdated timelines that force families to pay more.

“After 15 years of one-party rule, California’s public colleges have become more expensive, more bureaucratic, and students are stuck waiting for classes they need to graduate,” said Steve Hilton. “Working families are paying more and getting less. That ends when I’m governor.”

Hilton provides two gross examples:

“At the University of California, tuition for new in-state undergraduates is $15,588, and the university estimates the total annual cost can reach about $47,000 once housing, meals, books, transportation, and other expenses are included.

Even California Community Colleges, often sold as the cheap option, charge $46 per unit in enrollment fees, or $552 for a full-time 12-unit semester, before books, commuting, and everything else.”

Key Problems Steve Hilton Has Highlighted:

  • Rising Costs: CSU undergraduate tuition at $6,450/year (with increases planned); UC in-state tuition at $15,588/year, with total cost of attendance around $47,000 including living expenses; community colleges at $46/unit ($552 for a full-time semester), plus additional costs.
  • Beyond Tuition: Longer time to degree (e.g., only ~35% of CSU first-time students graduate in four years), class shortages, credit transfer losses, and remedial courses add unnecessary expenses and delays.
  • Blame: Democrats have protected the status quo, allowing bureaucracy and lack of accountability to drive up costs without reforms.

Main Elements of the Plan

  • Faster, Lower-Cost Degrees: Introduce three-year degree options and accelerated pathways to let students graduate sooner, enter the workforce earlier, and reduce overall costs by avoiding extra years of tuition and living expenses.
  • Tuition Freeze: Freeze in-state tuition while requiring the systems to cut waste and lower operational costs.
  • Accountability and Leadership: As governor, Hilton would use executive authority to drive reforms. His proposed lieutenant governor running mate, Gloria Romero (a former Democratic state Senate leader turned Republican, with education reform experience), would leverage her position on the governing boards of UC, CSU, and community colleges to advocate for affordability and accountability.
  • Transparency on Spending: Require campus-by-campus reporting, independent audits, and program reviews to expose waste, prioritize career-ready programs, and ensure efficient use of resources (including reviewing student housing allocation).
  • Improve Transfers and Access: Simplify transfer rules, enhance credit portability to prevent lost time/money, prioritize California residents in public university admissions, and fix preparation pipelines to reduce remedial needs.
  • Kindergarten-to-College Pipeline: Implement a strategy to better prepare students from early education onward.
  • Restore Standards: Emphasize merit-based decisions, enforce non-discrimination (per Proposition 209), protect student safety during protests, uphold fairness in women’s sports, and focus on results over bureaucracy.

Hilton’s plan aims to reverse what he calls the “cost trap” by modernizing the system, cutting inefficiencies, increasing accountability, and refocusing on outcomes so public colleges once again serve as a true ladder for upward mobility rather than a financial burden.

This aligns with his broader campaign theme of making California “affordable” (or “Califordable”) and restoring the California Dream through reforms in education, housing, taxes, and more. Note that his campaign website emphasizes K-12 reforms prominently (e.g., 3rd-grade literacy focus, accountability, school choice), but the provided details center on higher education affordability.

Read Steve Hilton’s and Gloria Romero’s entire plan HERE.

When I attended CSU Sacramento, tuition was $185.00 per semester, $370 per year (yes, Ronald Reagan was in his first term as President).

When CSU Sacramento first opened in 1947, the tuition fee for full time students was only $13 per year. By 1982, CSU was charging enrollment fees of $441 per year. By 2017, annual tuition had ballooned to $5,742.

The 2025 tuition & fees of CSU Sacramento is $8,018, and on-campus housing costs $24,078.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

3 thoughts on “Hilton-Romero Propose 3-Year Degrees & Freeze Tuition

  1. Right there with you, Katy, except I was attending/graduating from Cal State Northridge… same pricing model applied… I think my entire four year Bachelor’s in Business Administration cost LESS than what one year currently costs….
    Thank you for publishing all the flaws and deficiencies currently being deployed by the current crop of corrupt Democrat politicians and their stupid policies and unelected bureaucrats….

  2. Faculty in those accessible low cost college days expected little more than being the genteel poor, but getting paid to do what they loved to do: research and teach. And commune with like-minded colleagues in a protected ivory tower.

    90% of all those college price increases, that match student “loan” cash infusions into the system, went to gilded faculty compensation packages; not to gyms and country club student centers. That is just a faculty union deflection campaign.

    Transparent California is our friend, if one still thinks this all goes to “administrators”. Community college professors and even adjuncts are pulling down $400K a year – to teach lower divisions classes to throughly unprepared high school graduates, who now get an easy passes anyway just to keep their per student funding from the state. And avoid changes of racism if they do not pass them.

    Teachers/faculty unions work 24/7 on PR campaigns, casting blame on everyone and everything other than themselves. They are the ring leaders . The unions load up the Ed Code regulations with so much nit-picking junk it takes an army of “administrators” to keep the institutions from getting sued in an instant, by the unions for any infraction.

    1. You are right Jaye about some college professors. Where this scheme really started was with the Obama admin taking over the student loan program. Then, commensurately with student loans becoming available to everyone with a pulse, tuition increased exponentially. It was a calculated scheme, grift, con, and a form of extortion. I watched it up close when EdFund entered the game and spent money like drunken sailors until they were forced into a takeover:

      In 2010, this was EdFund’s demise:
      The U.S. Department of Education has announced that a Minnesota company will take over EdFund’s student loan portfolio – worth about $38 billion – all this after critical audits showed out-of-control spending at EdFund, an auxiliary of the California Student Aid Commission. (https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/on-the-money-edfund-take-over/)
      Obama nationalized student loans, and all colleges – public, private, state, and community colleges, jacked up fees, and required middle class and lower income students to take out loans. Parents went along with it so that Susie and Bobby could get into Harvard – whether they actually qualified or not. Harvard was all too happy to take the $$$$$.
      It was unbelievable government communism. Obama.

Leave a Reply to Jaye Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *