Home>Articles>Mamdani Proposes ‘White Homes’ Estate Tax; California Pushes Billionaire Tax

Mamdani Proposes ‘White Homes’ Estate Tax; California Pushes Billionaire Tax

Bringing back ‘TAX THE PRIVILEGED’ for ‘budget balancing revenue’

By Katy Grimes, March 24, 2026 8:12 am

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani is attempting to increase the estate tax “by lowering the exemption to $750,000 from its current value of $7.1 million” and massively raising the “top rate from 16% to 50%,” proclaiming his own apartheid.

$750,000 is the average price of a home in New York City. So Mamdani wants the white middle class to lose their homes apparently, “for the collective good.”

Making “the warmth of collectivism” sexy again…

As Daniel Greenfield reported at Frontpage Mag:

Zohran Mamdani campaigned on a promise to ‘shift the tax burden’ from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods. “His tenant official Cea Weaver tweeted that she wanted to  “impoverish the *white* middle class” because “homeownership is racist”, declared that “private property is a weapon of white supremacy” and warned that, “we’ll transition from treating property as an individual good to a collective good. Whites especially will be impacted.

Just wait until California leftists hear about this. They’ll be mad they didn’t think of it first, and then certain mayors in certain cities will get right to work on it… however, it won’t end well.

Greenfield continues:

The numbers are actually worse than 50% because within New York City, as many as 90% of homes will be hit with Mamdani’s confiscatory tax, as many as 60% of homes in Brooklyn and Queens, but fewer than a quarter in other boroughs. This matches Mamdani’s campaign promise to shift the tax burden towards white homeowners in inner boroughs.

But the real issue for the racially obsessed Mamdani administration is always race. And the estate tax proposal is specifically geared to target and seize the homes of white homeowners.

California Democrat lawmakers have proposed wealth taxes many times, and thus far they haven’t succeeded, so they instead embrace incrementalism and tax citizens on utilities, sales, services, property, and anything else not nailed down.

Democrats and the SEIU are pushing a retroactive billionaire tax targeting the roughly 220 billionaires residing in California in 2025, ignoring that these individuals are the most financially mobile and can live anywhere. And it’s not just a tax, it is asset seizure targeting billionaire’s “unrealized assets.” Expecting them to remain in the state as if they will happily and willingly hand over even more of their wealth surely must be facetious, the Globe reported.

California billionaires are already leaving the state in record numbers, and taking their billions with them. According to one billionaire, more than $1 Trillion has already left.

In 2020, the Globe reported “Commit To Equity,” a foolish organization created by labor unions and social justice groups, demanded hefty taxes on the California’s wealthy. They developed a three part strategy for raising revenue:

  • Wealth tax on billionaires: 0.4% on California residents that have a worldwide wealth of more than $30 million, or $15 million for those married filing separately
  • Wealth tax on millionaires: an additional 1% tax on income over $1 million, 3% on income over $3 million and 3.5% on income over $5 million.
  • Unrealized Capital Gains Tax: capital gains tax could be applied to the value of securities portfolios owned by the ultra wealthy.

Taxing unrealized capital gains on the “value of securities” is rich: if an asset is projected to make money but you don’t cash in on that profit, it’s an unrealized gain. But unrealized assets aren’t always profitable. This could really impact not just the portfolios owned by the wealthy, but also the pension plans of many government employees.

And they wanted it immediately: “We are asking you to call for a public hearing on these revenue proposals and pass new revenue this year.”

“New revenue” they called it. “Unrealized assets” they call it.

And if anyone thinks the billionaire tax will be a one-time tax, or it will only be billionaires who are taxed, I have a bridge to sell you.

California’s median home price is anywhere between $800,000 and $900,000, depending on who you ask. Taxing 50% of California’s homeowners must give Democrats the chills.

If the billionaire tax fails to qualify for the ballot, expect leftists to pivot to a 50% wealth tax proposal – again? They never stop trying to take what you have earned. Next time it might be with the caveat “white-only” stock portfolios or homes.

“Targeting white homeowners with a massive estate tax will help ensure that they will be unable to pass on their homes to their children,” Greenfield says. “The more homes the Mamdani government can seize and then ‘socialize’, the closer it will come to, as a Mamdani housing official said, turning homes into “a collective good” in which “whites especially will be impacted.” That’s systemic racism.”

Read his entire article, and then help make sure the billionaire tax does not qualify in California.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

7 thoughts on “Mamdani Proposes ‘White Homes’ Estate Tax; California Pushes Billionaire Tax

  1. Wealth tax for billionaires today. Wealth tax on everyone else courtesy of the Democrat supermajority tomorrow.

  2. Katy Grimes previously reported that Sacramento’s Democrat Mayor Kevin McCarty wants to increase the city’s real estate property tax on homes selling for more than $1 million in order to help plug Sacramento’s chronic budget deficits. McCarty flippantly claimed that it won’t affect most homeowners. As Katy Grimes concluded, McCarty should be recalled for his ludicrous proposal but he probably won’t be considering that Democrats completely control Sacramento and the city’s election outcomes are suspect with voter fraud?

    McCarty is a career Democrat politician who has a master degree in public policy and administration from Sacramento State. When is he going to get a real job in the private sector or maybe start a business? The answer is NEVER because he’d starve if taxpayers weren’t supporting him?

  3. Maybe all will finally and too late figure out being lackys for the Republican operatives did nothing but divert your attention away from what really mattered.

    The issues were who you let into America then who you allowed to vote: All the while you lavished on your detractors social benefits at your expense. How does it feel to now know you were played by the Republicans to your extinction?

    1. Wah? If you are referring to Mamdani, he came to the U.S. in 1998 with his communist parents when he was seven years old and Bill Clinton was president. Being a lacky for Newsom and Democrats has warped your brain. You sound like Biden and make no sense.

  4. Thanks Katy,
    Below is my new Press Release on this matter. Take care, Mindy

    SEIU is repeating the same playbook: hype a “crisis,” push another tax grab, and funnel benefits to insiders while working families pay. Joining hand in hand with Brian Galle, UC Berkeley School of Law and others who are behind the “billionaire tax”.

    Playing Robin Hood doesn’t work—history and economics prove that taking from the “rich” to fund bloated systems rarely delivers lasting benefits to the average person. Infact, it did not work in Massachusetts,

    In the case of the California Billionaire Tax Act (the 2026 ballot initiative pushed by SEIU-UHW, representing over 120,000 healthcare workers). Officially, the revenue (projected at up to $100 billion over time from a one-time 5% tax on net worth >$1 billion for ~200–255 Californians) goes almost to UHW public programs:and other projects. Sounds good, not good!

    Who wins? Not you.

    1)Not the single mom in East Oakland dodging tents and bullets.
    2)Not the fixed-income retiree watching every dollar vanish to taxes and crime costs.
    3)Not the small landlord bleeding out from bad policy and broken streets.

    This isn’t progressive policy; it’s predatory politics

    https://electmindy.com/

    Alexander Hamilton got it right: revenue comes from productive industry and business—not punitive wealth or property grabs that strangle the economy.

    The Constitution protects citizens’ general welfare, not turning them into ATMs for corrupt insiders.
    Oakland isn’t broke from too little money—it’s broke from waste, grift, and no accountability.
    Join my campaign now and let us rebuild our Oakland. This is the only solution!

    Check out my website https://electmindy.com/

    **************************************

    Contact Gerald Pechenuk, cities12345678@gmail.com for more information

    FPPC#1480943–

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *