Home>Articles>Over Half Of San Francisco’s Homeless Refused Shelter Space According To New City Data

Beautiful view of business center in downtown San Francisco at sunset. (Photo: f11photo/Shutterstock)

Over Half Of San Francisco’s Homeless Refused Shelter Space According To New City Data

Recent encampment caused fire, data raise concerns that city is not doing enough to shelter city homeless

By Evan Symon, August 4, 2023 2:33 am

New data released by the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management on Thursday found that 54% of homeless people in the city decline shelter, a figure that has been touted by many as helping explain why San Francisco’s homeless problem has gotten worse in recent years.

For years, the number of homeless in San Francisco has gone steadily up. While figures tend to fluctuate due to the complexities of the cities and counties of the Bay Area, homelessness in general has gone up significantly since the late 2000’s, with the Great Recession, tech boom, rise in housing costs, major changes to policing in the city, major job losses, and COVID-19 all being considered major factors in the rise. In 2023, San Francisco has, on an average night, 3,400 homeless in shelter beds, with another 4,400 on the street.

While that figure is not even close to where larger cities are at, with Los Angeles alone currently standing at around 46,000 in the city proper, San Francisco has not been forcing the shelter space issue, with no laws on the books saying that shelter space must be offered and homeless sweeps themselves from public areas is currently illegal, although the latter is currently being challenged in the courts. RVs, trailers, and other similar vehicles also have an outright ban from being lived in in the city, while other cities tend to work with those homeless by finding lot space and other areas to safely park overnight.

A solution many other cities are currently enforcing are encampment bans and bans for the homeless to be near areas of public safety such as schools overpasses, and daycare centers. Los Angeles passed the latter ban last year, with neighboring Culver City passing an outright tent ban. In San Diego, a recently passed encampment ban is due to be slowly ramped up over the next several months, with homeless people having to either accept shelter space or face being issued a misdemeanor or arrest if there is shelter space available. However, up North in San Francisco, it just isn’t on the radar.

This was brought to a head this week when a fire at a homeless encampment spread to an under construction building. While the blaze is being investigated, early signs have pointed to the encampment, which has had complaints about open flames in the past, being the culprit.

“The cause of yesterday’s fire in Hayes Valley is still under investigation,” said Mayor London Breed in a tweet on Wednesday. “While there is always a rush to judge what the cause may be, we must allow our investigators to do their jobs. However, I want to address concerns raised by the neighbors about nearby encampments.”

In a follow up statement she added, “We can’t force people to accept or stay in shelter and we’re unable to prevent people from setting up an encampment in area that was just cleaned. This is the situation we are in.”

The fire and statements from city officials led to public outrage on Wednesday, with it only being fueled further by the release of the new homeless data on Thursday. According to the Department of Emergency Management, city homeless teams recently approached 2,344 homeless people on the streets. Of those 2,344 people, 1,065 accepted shelter services, with 1,278 saying no. With over half of the city’s homeless saying no to shelter space, no laws forcing the city to get them into shelters, and new shelter space opening up to allow more intake, many in the city have called for similar encampment bans and shelter laws similar to LA and San Diego.

“San Francisco needs to realize that they need to tackle the homeless problem head on,” explained Gina Cortez, a Bay Area-based homeless services researcher, to the Globe on Thursday. “People in the city are angry that things aren’t getting done. LA didn’t do that for years, and look what happened there. But more to that, there are significant crime, public health, public safety, and other concerns here if nothing is being done. We saw that with the fire on Tuesday, but we have also been seeing it in the city for years. And we can’t just be like that idiot Mayor in Alaska Dave Bronson and just try to fly people out. This is complex.

“We need laws to reduce these tent encampments and we need laws  that really push shelter space on the homeless. There’s a way to make this work, and to their credit, San Francisco is boosting shelter space. But they need to go way beyond that. It’s a huge safety problem now, and forcing shelter space for those refusing to get off the street is a hard but necessary option at this point. There’s just no real way around it anymore.”

More news on what started the Hayes Valley fire is expected soon.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Evan Symon
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

12 thoughts on “Over Half Of San Francisco’s Homeless Refused Shelter Space According To New City Data

  1. For the umpteenth time, this is not rocket science. The drug addicts refuse subsidized shelter because it would directly interfere with their ongoing drug addiction. This Groundhog Day circus will never end until society forcefully separates the addicts from the drugs. Forcefully is the key term. The addicts won’t like it. The drug dealers won’t like it and the parasitic Homeless Industrial Complex won’t like it. F*ck all of them. The rest of society needs to protect itself.

  2. An exorcism (or an enema) needs to be performed to flush out the evil Democrat cabal who have destroyed San Francisco?

    1. TJ, I hope Desantis rips Newsom a new one in their upcoming debate, including Newsom’s culpability in what San Francisco has become.

  3. Re Breed’s “what can we do?”
    You can bar, ban, arrest, as Evan Symon reported other cities are doing.
    At the very least you can stop ENABLING them.
    Especially when they commit arson; there’s a clue. And it’s not a “rush to judgment” when Incidents 1-100,000 turn out to be homeless-caused fires; it’s called “inductive reasoning.” (We have 24 fires A DAY down here in L.A. that turn out to be homeless-lit. 2021 numbers)

    1. The homeless man who told the Tucker Carlson reporter, “Here in San Francisco they pay us to be homeless”, is a good clue. Quit giving them everything they need! Taxpayers don’t owe those people anything! Spending billions on this problem that only gets worse, is insanity!

  4. I encourage a different approach. We need a new, inexpensive policy to deal with the drug zombie homeless.
    Offer them UNLIMITED FREE toxic drugs (along with food and a tent) if they stay within a confined (locked down) area. Offer them help if they want to kick the habit and leave the compound.
    Once they voluntarily enter the “camp,” they can’t leave unless they are either dead or drug free.
    The problem will “cure” itself.

  5. It is well known that (used) clothing, meals , medical care ,occasional day packs and sleeping bags may be had for free in the Tenderloin so why work when you don’t have to?
    The weather is moderate for 8 months of the year and come the rain, cold weather shelters open up for 3 months where 2 meals a day are provided so San Francisco is “livable” if you are on the streets.

    Less “give aways” and limitations as to duration of sidewalk encampments would lessen the numbers as some of those who are would move elsewhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *