Home>Articles>The Greenberg Brief: Recent Events Prove Youth Should Not Vote

Official Ballot Drop Box placed ready to accept Voting Ballots for the upcoming election. Santa Ana, CA, Sept. 23, 2020. (Photo: mikeledray/Shutterstock)

The Greenberg Brief: Recent Events Prove Youth Should Not Vote

San Francisco twice rejected measures lowering voting age to sixteen

By Richie Greenberg, April 29, 2024 2:45 am

Sixteen year old teens were under consideration to be given the right to vote locally in San Francisco elections, as 2016 and 2020 ballot measures; both efforts failed. Now, word is there is a push to put a ballot measure before the city’s voters yet again.

I remember the debate well. In fact, yours truly was selected the official ballot measure opponent, writing the argument against that age-lowering proposal appearing in the November 2020 voter guide, known then as Prop G.

Here we are, four years later; according to statements made by enthusiastic youth leaders today, the justifications they give now have not changed. In other words, it’s the same tired and failed argument. Their hopes are, obviously, public sentiment has changed since 2020 in their favor. That the ballot measure’s past defeats are forgotten, that sufficient new resident voters have moved into the city and didn’t know the past two props’ failures. Hopes that the activism seen undertaken by Gen Z today are reason to push the youth voting measure over the top, this time.

But that’s precisely how the city has changed negatively since 2020, especially with Covid lockdowns, the George Floyd/BLM riots, the recalls of disgraced DA Chesa Boudin and three SF School Board commissioners, the doom-loop collapse of our retail sector, persistent and unregulated drug addiction, homelessness and unaccountable nonprofit spending, and most recently, the Israel/Gaza war featuring hair brained, hate-filled protests.

​Have our city’s youth been on the side of reason these last four years, earning them a spot in making decisions affecting our city? Sources say, resoundingly, no.

The historic events in San Francisco are reflected in two additional ways: This past March’s Super Tuesday elections of a “moderate” slate of Democratic Party local leadership seizing power from the previous majority leftists/socialists; and the city’s voters’ approval of two tough on accountability ballot measures. Media has portrayed these election results as proof the city is moving towards a centrist (gasp, more conservative?) stance. Youth voting is simply not seen as moderate, even for San Francisco.

Interestingly, apart from considering the aforementioned events since the previous failed voting age measure, one can simply cut and paste the opposition talking points from the 2020 voter guide into a 2024 argument. I wrote:

“Teens are children, legally. Parents are responsible for their children’s actions and to ensure their well-being.  They need permission slips to go off school grounds. Unfortunately, we see increasing evidence of San Francisco’s schools’ indoctrinating our youth, heavily politicizing so many aspects of our city’s issues and our lives, that a child does not receive the best information to make a truly informed decision. Potential bias is everywhere.” This statement from 2020 rings resoundingly true today.

College campuses are increasingly being taken over by lunatic, malicious antisemites bearing anti-American, ethnic cleansing slogans, symbols, costumes and hatred, damaging our institutions and vandalizing property. Bridges and freeways are blockaded. We still don’t know at this point how this crisis in education will resolve. We also don’t know how the majority of Americans can accept protest participants being part of civil society and gain employment in a meaningful way. It’s all a very unfortunate unknown. What we do not need, ever, is for this type of petulant, tantrum-throwing, Tik-tok brainwashed youth so easily and effectively influenced to be making decisions at sixteen years old by voting on such critically important issues like those facing San Francisco.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

4 thoughts on “The Greenberg Brief: Recent Events Prove Youth Should Not Vote

  1. What about RAISING the voting age to TWENTY-SIX (or HIGHER!), as a dose of real-life, post-college life PAYING REAL BILLS for REAL-LIFE expenses like utilities, insurance and transportation will give these “youngsters” a view of the IMPLICATIONS of their voting, and likely change their perspectives on life after the echo-chamber of indoctrination that they receive from “educators”….

  2. The first time I voted I was 18, working at Chicken Delight waiting for my draft notice “to go kill short commies”. Sensing I was out of my league, I gave my ballot to my older brother. He gave them both to our dad.
    Today, I put my votes out to the family via e mail since I actually read the arguments. One year I didn’t do it. Several grands and kids actually called me asking “where’s our votes?”
    At least I put in the work. If I had the power I would roll it back up to 21.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *