Home>Articles>San Diego Ranked As Most Expensive City To Live In U.S. According To New Study

Downtown San Diego Sunset. (Photo: Dancestrokes/Shutterstock)

San Diego Ranked As Most Expensive City To Live In U.S. According To New Study

Study also finds that 12 of top 20 most expensive cities fall within California

By Evan Symon, October 26, 2023 5:25 pm

A new study by the U.S. News and World Report released on Thursday found that San Diego is the most expensive city to live in in 2023, with 12 of the top 20 most expensive cities being within California.

According to the study, San Diego, Los Angeles, Honolulu,  Miami, and Santa Barbara are the 5 most expensive cities in the country. San Francisco, Santa Rosa, and Salinas grab the next three top spots, with Vallejo/Fairfield coming in at 10th, San Jose at 14th, Sacramento at 15th, Stockton at 17th, Modesto at 19th, and finally Fresno at 20th.

For San Diego, high home and rent prices combined with the area being a desired place to live and an overall high cost of living make the city the most expensive in the U.S. The median home price within the city is $919,000, well over L.A.’s median price of $836,000 and Santa Barbara’s of $465,000. However, San Diego comes just below Salinas’ $925,000 median home price and well below San Francisco’s, which is currently a whopping $1.1 million.

Rent for the cities is on a similar level. The average rental price in San Diego is $1,800 a month, while in Los Angeles only a few hours away it is just under $1,700. Salinas comes in with a price comparable to L.A. and Santa Barbara’s average rent is about the same as San Diego. However, San Francisco leads the pack once again with an average rental price just above $2,100.

While San Francisco has many indicators that they would top the list, as the cost of living there is also very high, drastically reduced desirability in recent years because of crime, homelessness, flagrant open drug use, and several other factors lowered their ranking on the list significantly. Los Angeles was also spared the top spot thanks to a slightly less cost of living and somewhat cheaper home and rental prices. While L.A. is still a highly desirable place to live, L.A.’s overall popularity couldn’t move it past San Diego.

Living in San Diego is not particularly affordable,” said the study. “Home prices are considerably higher than the national median sale price. Additionally, many living in the downtown area have to pay homeowners association fees, used to maintain common areas in apartment and condominium complexes. San Diegans are willing to pay these elevated prices, though, often referring to the cost-of-living differences as the “sunshine tax,” or the price of enjoying a year-round temperate climate.”

Cost of living experts told the Globe on Thursday that the results were not surprising as both L.A. and San Diego have remained popular despite the state losing around 800,000 residents between January 2020 and January 2023.

“San Francisco used to top these lists and studies before the COVID pandemic happened,” Marilyn Dorian, a cost of living advisor based in Southern California, told the Globe. “Crime wasn’t as bad, and the city was surging thanks to money coming in from the tech industry. But now? The city has fallen fast. Prices for homes are only as high as they are now because people don’t want to part for them without making a profit. Pay is significantly higher here, but that’s because it has to be do to all the higher costs.”

“San Jose is still ranked high, but notice that Oakland is now no longer in the top 25. The cities where these residents are fleeing to in the surrounding area are facing higher costs as a result, so you see Stockton and Sacramento here. These cities used to be referred to as cow towns, but now they are cities still growing in California while San Francisco is now in decline.”

“But, as we saw, San Diego and Los Angeles top the list. People still want to live there, want the weather, and have a lot of good paying jobs there. Problem is that it brings higher prices along with it. More people, the prices on things goes up, and that is what we’ve been seeing. L.A. shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone as it has always been up here for years. And neither should San Diego, who is now the most expensive. They have problems with crime too, but nowhere near what San Francisco has become. So San Francisco may still have high home prices and rental prices, but they just are not overall as expensive as SoCal cities anymore. And they will probably decline more in the next several years.”

More studies on the high costs of California are to come out soon.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Evan Symon
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

4 thoughts on “San Diego Ranked As Most Expensive City To Live In U.S. According To New Study

  1. About 1/2 of the Californians migrating to other states moved to just 5 – TX, AZ, NV, WA and FL.
    What do these states have in common? 4 of these states do not levy an income tax at all. The other, AZ, levies a 2.5% flat rate income tax.
    It’s not just that CA is losing population. It’s that for the first time, most of the departees today are higher income people.

  2. Hmmm,…….. have not seen anything in Santa Barbara city proper for $465,00. Nothing, unless it is a city mandated price-fixed inclusionary unit, which rarely if ever come on the market for resale.

    Maybe a mobile home at one of the new rather sketchy mobile home parts in the city might cost that amount, but park fees are pretty onerous on top of that sales price. Do they mean the county of Santa Barbara instead of the city proper?

    Recent cruise passenger to San Diego reported the downtown area close to the cruise port was a cess pit of vagrants. But SF was surprisingly reported to be clean and sparkling for the most part, though somehow the feeling of a ghost town too.

    Still a shame they are still tearing down perfectly good homes in Detroit while claiming people cannot “afford” to live in California. We have a mismatch in available housing; not a housing crisis.

    I also think we have a wholly deficient personal budgeting crisis, when young people complain they “cannot afford” to live in premium coastal California cities. But then I am old and was raised on thrift, and saving for what you want.

  3. The real loss is the departure of those now receiving full government employee pensions (CalPERS/CalSTRS) who do not recirculate those original state tax dollars back into the state itself. Instead they hightail it to lower costs states and live like wealthy plutocrats on their California taxpayer-funded pension payouts.

    Transparent California also tracks various state pension payouts by name of recipient. Read it and weep before ever claiming our state “first responders and teachers” are under paid. Kamala Harris is making us pay big time for shooting down two ballot qualified pension reform initiatives as state AG, before she departed for greener pastures for herself.

    Who will be funding the massive government pension underfunding short falls which will kick in after a few more years? Even Gavin Newsom now wants to now leave the state, and not face this crisis he refused to acknowledge on his watch.

    The crisis that every municipal body also kicked down the road, and every current elected official can also now escape liability for ignoring …… due to ‘term limits”. They are long gone when this public pension short fall hits the fan.

    Term limits – the gift that keeps on giving, but all the wrong things.

  4. San Diego has been losing population since 2018, and Los Angeles since 2017. that doesn’t bode well for property values.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *