Home>Articles>Steve Hilton Alleging CHIRLA Using Illegal Immigrants to Campaign for Xavier Becerra for Governor

Herb Morgan, Jenny Rae LaRoux, Steve Hilton, Michael Gates, in front of CHIRLA building LA. (Photo: https://x.com/SteveHiltonx/status/2052091039461396969)

Steve Hilton Alleging CHIRLA Using Illegal Immigrants to Campaign for Xavier Becerra for Governor

‘That is not passive support – that is political protection’

By Katy Grimes, May 7, 2026 2:27 pm

Republican Candidate for California Governor Steve Hilton unleashed a bombshell Wednesday against Democrat candidate Xavier Becerra: Hilton alleges that California taxpayer funding is being used by the Becerra campaign to pay for illegal immigrants to campaign for Xavier Becerra, in a weird sort of “quid pro quo.”

CAL DOGE claims internal documents show this outreach by CHIRLA, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, is tied to the Becerra endorsement and uses public funding indirectly for partisan campaign work, including payments to illegal immigrants who don’t have legal work authorization.

This would be a serious violation of federal law on unauthorized employment and misuse of funds. Hilton called it “illegal theft of public money” at a press conference outside of a CHIRLA office Wednesday.

“A voter-contact operation built around immigrant communities has every incentive to back the candidate most likely to protect and expand the policy environment that feeds it,” CAL DOGE says.

Hilton says “taxpayer-funded non-profit CHIRLA endorsed Becerra April 13th. Our investigation reveals payments to illegal immigrants for campaign activity.”

The allegation from Hilton and CAL DOGE is that CHIRLA’s operations create a pipeline where taxpayer-funded services – all sorts of immigration aid through naturalization – feed into political mobilization.

This isn’t the first time CHIRLA has been in the headlines. Last year the U.S. House Judiciary Committee announced that they were investigating whether CHIRLA, which they called an “activist organization with ties to the Democratic Party that received nearly $1 million in grants under the Biden administration used the funds to foment the anti-ICE riots that ripped through Los Angeles earlier this month.”

“In a letter obtained by The New York Post addressed to the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), the committee details the taxpayer-funded grants doled out to the group by the federal government between 2021 and 2023.”

“This raises concerns that CHIRLA may be using federal funds to support violent criminal activity that impedes the enforcement of federal immigration law,” the letter states in reference to the funds, which ostensibly were paid out to support things like “citizenship instruction and naturalization services” and “innovations in citizenship education.”

CAL DOGE reported Wednesday:

The scandal is not a hidden campaign check. It is a public-funded service network that builds political power, then backs the candidate who could govern the money.*

The first rule of a political machine is that the most important subsidy is not always the check. It is the infrastructure.

That is what makes Xavier Becerra’s relationship with CHIRLA Action Fund matter. The clean fact is right on Becerra’s own campaign website: CHIRLA Action Fund is listed as an organizational endorser of his 2026 campaign for California governor.

CALO News reported that the endorsement followed interviews with more than 200 CHIRLA Action Fund leaders across California, many of them new voters or new citizens. The same report said Angelica Salas, president of the Fund, announced that the organization would work to elect Becerra in the primary and then in November.

Then the organization came back for him. When Tom Steyer attacked Becerra over his record as HHS secretary, CALO News reported that CHIRLA Action Fund held a press conference to refute the accusations, called Becerra a champion, and demanded the ad come down.

That is not passive support. That is political protection.

The mistake is to look only for a campaign check. A check is disclosed, capped, debated and forgotten. Infrastructure compounds. It builds trust. It trains organizers. It creates repeat contact. It turns casework into community loyalty, community loyalty into civic participation, and civic participation into candidate power.

Becerra is the test because the whole pipeline is visible at once.

CHIRLA Action Fund, the political 501(c)(4) arm of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, formally endorsed Xavier Becerra for California governor on April 13, 2026, announced on Instagram, and in statements, committing to work to elect him in the June 2 primary and the November General Election.

Xavier Becerra accepted their endorsement.

“According to financial records obtained by DataRepublican, CHIRLA received nearly $34 million in government grants, mostly from the state of California, in the fiscal year ending June 2023, a jump from the $12 million it received the previous year,” the House Judiciary Committee reported.

The radical group also received around $450,000 in grants for “citizenship education and training” between October 2021 and September 2024 from the Department of Homeland Security, the very agency CHIRLA was protesting.

CHIRLA has received more than $100 million reported over longer periods, and they have received federal grants, including $1 million from DHS/Biden-Harris administration for citizenship education.

CAL DOGE says:

The endorsement is only the tip

CHIRLA Action Fund is explicit about its role. Its own “Who We Are” page says the organization was founded to support candidates, legislation and ballot initiatives. It says the Fund organizes immigrants to participate in the electoral process, supports candidates aligned with its priorities, and runs education, canvassing and phone-bank programs to turn out Latino and new American voters. ProPublica lists the Action Fund as a 501(c)(4).

CHIRLA, the service-side nonprofit, is different on paper. ProPublica lists Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights as a 501(c)(3) public charity. Its filings show scale: $12.37 million in government grants in FY2022, $33.97 million in FY2023, and $25.59 million in FY2024. Over three fiscal years, that is roughly $72 million in government-grant revenue.

The same records show lobbying did not disappear as the public money grew. CHIRLA’s FY2024 Schedule C reports lobbying activity, and related-organization filings point to the firewall question between CHIRLA and CHIRLA Action Fund.

Those facts do not prove illegality. They prove scale, proximity and risk.

A real firewall is not a logo. It is staff allocation, cost allocation, list controls, shared-facility rules, reimbursement records, vendor contracts and audit trails. If those records are clean, release them. If they are not clean, that is the story.

CAL DOGE continues:

The pipeline is published, not hidden

CHIRLA’s own Immigrant Political Power Project page says the quiet part in institutional language. It describes an electoral project run as a joint initiative of CHIRLA and CHIRLA Action Fund. It targets new citizens, Latinos and English learners. It says the aim is to build a voter base from scratch, with enough power to sway state politics.

It also describes repeated pre-election contact, paid and volunteer canvassers and phone bankers, and a field force whose immigration status ranges from undocumented to lawful permanent resident. The page says these contacts become teaching sessions about political strategy, volunteering and the electoral landscape.

The line that matters is not hidden in a hostile report. It is on CHIRLA’s own page: a voter base “engineered from our own efforts.”

Now connect that to Becerra. The candidate being helped by this political arm is not running for city council. He is running for governor. A governor shapes budgets, appoints agency leaders, influences audits, and decides whether state-funded programs grow or shrink.

That makes the endorsement a governance issue.

Where is CAL DOGE going with this? Right toward newly introduced legislation. “That is not a side issue. That is the field CHIRLA occupies,” CAL DOGE says.

Assemblywoman Mia Bonta (D-Oakland), California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s wife, introduced “landmark legislation AB 2600 in March, creating a state taxpayer-funded program to provide free legal services to illegal immigrants facing deportation, with priority for people held in federal immigration detention.

Nobody Should Face Deportation Alone,” said Bonta. “In California, thousands of our neighbors are being swept into one of the most complex legal systems in the country, often in a second language, without an attorney or a fair shot.”

“The Trump administration’s mass deportation machine is accelerating that injustice,” Bonta continues. “AB 2600 represents California’s chance to stand up for our values: a commitment to due process, dignity, and the principle that justice shouldn’t depend on what you can afford. Representing one of the state’s most immigrant-rich communities, I am proud to fight for every Californian’s right to a fair hearing.”

CAL DOGE brings the receipts:

AB 2600 turns the Becerra-CHIRLA story from campaign politics into future policy. The official bill text would require California, subject to available state funding, to provide legal counsel to every covered indigent individual in specified immigration proceedings who does not already have representation. The bill gives the Department of Social Services, or an administering entity, the ability to contract with nonprofit legal-service organizations, public-defender offices and other providers. It also provides for community-based outreach and education grants.

This is the loop: government funds immigration services. Immigration services build institutional reach. Institutional reach supports more immigration-services policy. Expanded policy creates more need for providers, more grants, more staff, more outreach, more community contact and more political leverage. Then the political arm endorses candidates who can shape the next funding cycle.

That is how machines compound.

Becerra should say whether he supports AB 2600. He should say whether he would sign it. He should say whether groups endorsing his campaign should remain eligible for new state contracts, subawards, outreach grants or administrative roles without enhanced disclosure and conflict controls.

A serious governor would answer before the election, not after.

Read the entire CAL DOGE report here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

2 thoughts on “Steve Hilton Alleging CHIRLA Using Illegal Immigrants to Campaign for Xavier Becerra for Governor

  1. $ are Fungible, so have fun following the Money. We all have to think, if if this is something so easy and good, why has it been made so complicated? I think I know why.

  2. So taxpayer-funded non-profit CHIRLA endorsed that corrupt dimwit Xavier Becerra for governor? A 501(c)(4) organization cannot use taxpayer funds to endorse a candidate which are supposed to rely on private donations, not public funding. The IRS needs investigate CHIRLA and the DOJ needs to prosecute those involved!

Leave a Reply to Fed Up in NORCAL Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *