Home>Articles>‘Deepfake’ Videos Of Political Candidates in Ads Now Illegal In California
Marc Berman authored the "Deepfake" bill.
Assemblyman Marc Berman authored the "Deepfake" bill. (Kevin Sanders for California Globe)
Articles Governor Highlight Legislature Media

‘Deepfake’ Videos Of Political Candidates in Ads Now Illegal In California

Altered footage of candidates can not run by law within 60 days of an election

By Evan Symon, October 7, 2019 8:17 pm

Manipulated photos, video, and audio, specifically “deepfake” videos that alter candidates to say or look like something or someone else, has been made illegal in California.

Under the new law, which was passed in the form of AB 730, an altered video, picture, or audio clip of a candidate cannot run within 60 days of an election.

Deepfake videos in particular are targeted, as they are often confused for being real due to how lifelike they can look. 

Assemblyman Marc Berman (D-Palo Alto) authored AB 730 in the hope that faked footage or media would not alter the election or change votes.

“Deepfakes are a powerful and dangerous new technology that can be weaponized to sow misinformation and discord among an already hyper-partisan electorate,” said Assemblyman Berman. “Deepfakes distort the truth, making it extremely challenging to distinguish real events and actions from fiction and fantasy.”

Assemblyman Berman enjoyed a majority of Assembly and Senate votes, as well as the support from many political and citizen groups who oppose manipulation like “deepfaking.”

A few Democrat and Republican lawmakers voted no, as there was worry over First Amendment and personal freedom issues involved. Groups such as the ACLU also opposed the new law, as they made a case in it violating the First Amendment.

Experts have warned that the law will be hard to enforce, as internet footage may be hard to take down, and there are questions regarding copyright laws with the footage. There is also concern that the bill is not addressing the main problem, as the altered video is still allowed to run as long as there is a disclaimer beforehand.

“The video can still get out at the end, through a disclaimer that hits the bare requirements for how long it’s shown,” said attorney Zach Gaston. “It’s under parody law, so you’ll see this pop up all over the place on TV and the internet. All AB 730 did was specify a certain type of place where it couldn’t be run, at the same time allowing it to be run with no issue.”

AB 730 was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom and is only valid until 2023 when it will be reviewed to see how successful it was and what changes would be needed due to better technology in the future.

Evan Symon

Evan V. Symon is the Senior Editor for the California Globe. Prior to the Globe, he reported for the Pasadena Independent, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, and was head of the Personal Experiences section at Cracked. He can be reached at evan@californiaglobe.com.
Evan Symon
Spread the news:
Filter by
Post Page
Feature Articles Media National Governor Legislature Highlight Legal Local San Francisco
Sort by

‘Deepfake’ Audio and Visual Political Ads Faces Ban With Looming Senate Vote

Opponents warn AB 730 fails to make any provision for speech protected by the First Amendment,
September 10, 2019 1:34 pm


An Overview of Local and State Open Meetings Laws in California

What exactly is a ‘meeting?’
October 21, 2019 2:25 am


How Many Laws Does San Francisco’s Prop. A Violate?

Six hundred million dollars for, at best, less than 1,000 units of new housing
October 21, 2019 2:10 am


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *