Friends of Earth Sues DOE Over $1.1 Billion Diablo Canyon Plant Extension Funding
‘Diablo Canyon is needed for a green energy focused California, and they just can’t handle that’
By Evan Symon, April 4, 2024 2:30 am
The environmental group Friends of Earth sued the United States Department of Energy on Wednesday over the $1.1 billion the Department gave the state to keep the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant open until at least 2030, citing that they had used a faulty safety assessment when awarding the funds.
The debate over extending the life of the Diablo Canyon Plant has been ongoing since 2018, when concerns over earthquakes, nuclear waste pollution, and other factors convinced CPUC to close the plant by 2025. Proponents of the plant quickly moved to try and extend the life of the plant, with concerns over state energy production quickly bringing more and more support in their favor. Many were attracted to the fact that keeping the plant open for a decade or two more would save the state $21 billion in systems costs, while others, concerned about large gaps in California’s energy production while transitioning into the 100% renewable energy power by 2045 goal, signaled support as a power source to help bridge the gap. The fact that Diablo Canyon provides 9% of California’s total energy production, and is a clean source of energy, has also convinced many people of keeping the plant open.
While several bills in the 2010’s and early 2020’s failed to keep the plant open, one, SB 846, was finally passed by both houses in the state legislature last year. At the same time, Governor Gavin Newsom put out a proposal to keep the plant running for another 5-10 years, outlining how state and federal support would be needed. Despite signing the bill into law, over $1 billion in funding was still needed to make the extension feasible, as well as final approvals from multiple state and federal agencies, such as approval of a new license by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
In November of 2022, the Department of Energy awarded $1.1 billion to extend the life of the plant, signaling federal support for the plant for both clean energy and to help avert a power crisis in California in the next decade while green energy production gradually replaces fossil fuel energy. This led to the NRC deciding in March 2023 to keep the plant open while license renewal is being considered. With the clock temporarily suspended, final extensions to at least 2030 now came down to license renewal from both CPUC and the NRC.
Diablo Canyon extension
Environmental groups continued to challenge the plant and PG&E to close it by 2025. However, despite numerous lawsuits, all of their attempts failed. This included a state court rejecting a lawsuit by an environmental group to close the plant in August of last year and the NRC rejecting a request from several environmental groups to shut down one of the reactors in October 2023. Subsequently, CPUC voted to keep the plant running through 2030 in November and the Biden administration finalized the $1.1 billion in January.
Despite it being virtually a done deal, Friends of Earth gave a final challenge on Wednesday. According to their lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, the environmental assessment covered by the DOE is decades out of date, with environmental risks such as earthquakes not being properly integrated in.
“The environmental impacts from extending the lifespan of this aging power plant at this point in time have not been adequately addressed or disclosed to the public,” said the suit. “This case challenges the award of over $1 billion in federal funding to keep the aging Diablo Canyon Power Plant from shutting down. The U.S. Department of Energy’s approval of this award involves a fundamentally flawed and arbitrary process under the National Environmental Policy Act. DOE purported to satisfy its NEPA obligations under the new Civil Nuclear Credit Program by adopting an over 50-year old environmental analysis, along with other outdated and incomplete NEPA documents—that taken together are grossly deficient to satisfy DOE’s NEPA obligations for this award—in lieu of either conducting its own original or supplemental NEPA analysis, subject to public participation or any opportunity to comment, in support of DOE’s January 2, 2024 Record of Decision authorizing the award of funding.”
However, experts have retorted that the Friends of Earth lawsuit would likely go nowhere, as the documents with the case were all legal, but also in line with current regulations.
“They’re desperate,” Sal Braith, a nuclear engineer who has worked at multiple nuclear plants in the U.S., told the Globe. “The documents are not outdates, it’s all complete. They’re grasping at straws because they just don’t want a nuclear plant. Courts have routinely struck down case after case by groups like these. And that’s not even getting into the fact that Diablo Canyon is vital in helping California switch over from a fossil fuel centric energy system in California to a green power centric one. Diablo Canyon is needed to fill in those gaps.”
“So, we’re at a point where they want California’s alternative energy build up to fail all because of not wanting nuclear to help make it happen. It’s not just a bad plan. It’s extremely hypocritical. Diablo Canyon is needed for a green energy focused California, and they just can’t handle that.”
More on the lawsuit is to come out soon as the extension date for the plant continues to linger.
- 13th House District Race Between Duarte, Gray Within 351 Votes With 98% Of The Vote In - November 21, 2024
- CA 2025-2026 State Budget Deficit at $2 Billion, Expected To Grow Exponentially - November 21, 2024
- Los Angeles City Council Passes Sanctuary City Ordinance - November 20, 2024
I would be interested in knowing who is funding the Friends of the Earth. I was a student at Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo when Diablo Canyon opened in the mid 1980’s. The loons that were against it then were using the same arguments against the operation then that they are today. The main arguments back then were earthquakes and a big tsunami striking the facility. Here we are 40 years later, and they are still sounding the same alarms. The Climate alarmists’ arguments are old and have been debunked by time. Remember it was Al Gore who back in the early 2000’s that said that we only had a decade to save the earth from climate disasters. Folks this nothing more than an old fashion snake oil salesman tactic repackaged to scare us. It takes courage to standup against lies.
“I would be interested in knowing who is funding the Friends of the Earth.”
Here you go, Hal. Follow the link below. And just because a big earthquake/tsunami has not happened in 40 years, does not mean that it cannot happen. Look at what just happened in Taiwan. In fact, the longer a major event like that does not happen in California, increases the likelihood that it will. So, there is good reason to phase out these older breeder reactors like Diablo Canyon and transition to newer, safer, nuclear reactors……
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends_of_the_Earth
Friends of Earth? More like Enemies of Humanity. The so-called “environmental” groups are actually anti-human. They do NOTHING for the environment.
Raymond, Thanks for the link to the Friends of the Earth organization. I see that one of their primary tenants is anti-nuclear and that they split off from the Sierra Club. A quick look at the Diablo Canyon earthquake construction standards and the plant was built to be able to withstand a 7.5 magnitude earthquake and the Shoreline Fault which is close by is capable of generating an earthquake of 6.5 magnitude. You can read about Diablo Crayons safety features at the attached link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_Canyon_earthquake_vulnerability
What I don’t appreciate are arguments based on an incomplete set of facts and tend to lead folks towards an emotional response. I think that I read that this plant currently produces 9% of Californias power? What I do not see is how solar and wind can replace this production efficiently and at night. We installed solar in 2013 and I have an all of above approach when it comes to power production (hydro, natural gas, nuclear, solar, geothermal, and wind). Californias current energy policies are short sighted and producing some of the highest prices for consumers in the nation.