Home>Articles>California Lettuce Growers Regulatory Compliance 1,400% Higher Per Acre Since 2006 When CA Climate Change Bill was Passed

Salinas Valley agriculture marred by windmills. (Photo: Katy Grimes for California Globe, April 2026)

California Lettuce Growers Regulatory Compliance 1,400% Higher Per Acre Since 2006 When CA Climate Change Bill was Passed

Are Democrat lawmakers willing to destroy food production in California over the imaginary air quality crisis?

By Katy Grimes, May 5, 2026 12:32 pm

A 2025 Cal Poly research paper revealed that California lettuce growers now spend 12.6% of their total production costs on regulatory compliance.

The Cal Poly study, which updated prior analyses in 2006 and 2017, titled “Two Decades of Change: Evolving Costs of Regulatory Compliance in the Produce Industry,” was authored by agribusiness professors Lynn Hamilton and Michael McCullough and commissioned by the Monterey County Farm Bureau. It examines a large-scale commercial lettuce operation (over 1,000 acres) in the Salinas Valley. 

The study wasn’t just released, but it is quite relevant today, and demonstrative of how destructive California’s excessive regulatory environment is.

Cal Poly Professors Hamilton and McCullough address the ever-increasing costs of regulation and how they are a constant concern for California growers.

“An initial study of regulatory costs in California agriculture was conducted in 2006, as means to compare California’s regulatory environment to other competing states,” they report.

However, also in 2006, the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 32, Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenneger signed AB 32 into law, which ordered the state to reduce carbon emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020, imposing a host of new regulations on every imaginable business in the state.

“Industry groups in the Salinas Valley contacted Cal Poly to update the original study in 2018 as new state and federal laws imposed significantly higher regulatory burdens on growers, specifically with respect to food safety, water quality, labor wages, air quality and worker health and safety,” the authors said. “We used 2017 data as it was the most recently completed full production year.”

Perhaps most telling is the devastating impact the California Air Resources Board regulations have had on California agriculture.

The study reported some background: [emphasis the Globe]:

The original study in 2006 reported no costs for air quality regulation. By 2017, state laws required more extensive reporting under the AB 32, Global Warming Solutions Act, even for “clear air” areas such as Monterey County. As of May 2007, all agricultural diesel engine equipment, both stationary and mobile, must be registered with the MBARD (Monterey Air Board), and equipment emissions must be monitored (California Air Resources Board). In 2017, the grower reported spending $5.31 per acre on air quality compliance, the lowest of any category; most of the costs were in staff time to report equipment and emissions information as well as upgrading equipment filters.

In 2020, a new California Air Resources Board rule known as the Truck and Bus Regulation requires all heavy-duty diesel vehicles that operate in California to reduce toxic exhaust emissions. By January 2023, nearly all heavy-duty diesel trucks and buses operating in the state are required to have 2010 or newer model year engines to reduce particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. The ranch’s trucks were found to be non-compliant with the rule in 2024, and the ranch was fined $1,900. They were required to replace three trucks, which cost $60,000 each, and are expected to be in service for 10 years. Existing haul trucks had emissions filters upgraded at $25,000 each; the expected life span is six years. The lettuce grower has two staff members who each spend 40 hours annually reporting equipment and emissions information to the MBARD. The ranch’s irrigation pumps fall under the Agricultural Diesel Engine Registration, Rule 310, of the MBARD; which requires most stationary diesel-powered engines on agricultural operations to have a permit. The annual fees are $243 for the first engine and $173 for each additional engine. The total air quality compliance costs per acre in 2024 was $8.29, the lowest of all regulatory categories, but an increase of 56% over 2017 costs.

And the results of increased regulatory costs:

In the 2006 study, the cooperating lettuce grower reported regulatory costs totaling $109.15 per acre or 1.26% of total production costs. Lettuce production costs were $8,793 per acre. Workers’ compensation comprised over half of regulatory costs in the initial report; other compliance areas included water quality, food safety, worker education and training.

However, by 2017, the regulatory landscape had drastically changed, precipitated by a 2006 E. coli outbreak in spinach in the Salinas Valley (that occurred after the 2006 data was collected) that altered the landscape for food safety compliance. New environmental and worker wage and safety laws were also imposed in the ensuing years. The 2017 data showed that regulatory costs were $977.30 per acre, or 8.90% of total production costs. The grower’s total production costs were $10,977 per acre in 2017.

The results of the first comparison case study showed that production costs increased by 24.8% from 2006 to 2017, but the costs of regulatory compliance rose by 795%.

Increased compliance requirements in 2024 bring the grower’s total costs of regulation to $1,600.12 per acre, which is a 63.7% increase from 2017 and a 1366% increase since 2006.

What are the areas of regulatory compliance farmers have been hit with?

  • Food Safety
  • Air Quality
  • Water Quality
  • Labor Health and Safety
  • Labor Wages
  • Workers’ compensation was the highest cost of regulatory compliance and had risen to $336 per acre.
  • Labor wage regulations comprised another $189 per acre
  • food safety compliance followed closely behind at $181 per acre
  • Affordable Care Act requirements added $141 per acre
  • pesticide regulatory compliance totaled over $35 per acre
  • Other regulatory compliance costs totaled between $5.50 and $28 per acre

“The results of the updated case study show that, for this lettuce grower, production costs increased 24.8% from 2006 to 2017, but the costs of regulatory compliance rose by 795%.”

Notably, according to the California Department of Food and Agriculture, California grows 76% of all lettuce in the U.S.

Monterey County, where the data for this study was collected, produces 60% of California’s lettuce.

Someone needs to ask California Democrat lawmakers if they are willing to destroy food production in California over the imaginary air quality crisis.

In 2025, the Globe reported that the EPA was about to rescind Obama-era and Biden greenhouse gas regulations:

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin is proposing the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States, by repealing the 2009 Obama EPA “Endangerment Finding,” the central basis for much of the U.S.’s climate policy, which directed all the greenhouse gas regulations on vehicles that followed, and the much despised start/stop feature.

The Endangerment Finding, is a finding under the Clean Air Act that claims greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.

The regulation has been used to justify over $1 trillion in regulations, including the Biden-Harris Administration’s electric vehicle (EV) mandate.

And as expected, the EPA rescinded the greenhouse gas endangerment finding on February 12, 2026, which eliminated the legal basis for regulating greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and engines under the Clean Air Act.

The Cal Poly report identified the major drivers included in the layered rules:

  • Education and Training for Regulatory Compliance
  • Air Quality Requirements
  • Water Quality/Quantity Requirements
  • Department of Pesticide Regulation
  • Food Safety
  • Workers Compensation
  • Affordable Care Act
  • Labor Health & Safety Requirements
  • Assessments

Within these categories are the specifics:

Labor (overtime, sick leave, wages, workers’ comp, Affordable Care Act requirements) — often the largest category.

Food safety (e.g., post-2006 E. coli-related standards; now ~$244 per acre, up dramatically from $0.64 in 2006).

Environmental (water quality, groundwater management, air quality).

Pesticides, worker health/safety training, and various assessments/fees.

With California producing the vast majority of U.S. lettuce, these costs affect national supply and prices. While some regulations target legitimate issues, as the study authors point out, such as food borne illness prevention, and worker protections, the rapid escalation of regulatory costs has dramatically outpaced overall production and revenue. Farmers may be used to thin profit margins, but when regulatory compliance takes 12%+ of costs off of the top without proportional price increases, it diminishes the already thin profitability.

California already has far too much fallowed farm land, mostly over groundwater issues, and now we can add ridiculous and very expensive regulations, which could result in more fallowed land, and reliance on other states or countries for food.

Similar regulatory costs patterns appear in other California crops (e.g., a related Cal Poly look at wine grapes). The state’s regulatory stack of labor, water, air, and safety creates a uniquely high burden compared to other U.S. growing regions.

As the Globe has been pointing out for many years, California already surpassed its original greenhouse gas emissions reductions target of 1990 levels of  by 2020 – this was achieved in 2016 – even the Governor’s Climate Dashboard website admitted this:

“The 2006 California Global Warming Solutions Act (Assembly Bill 32) set a target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions back to 1990 levels by 2020. California surpassed this target four years early in 2016, and emissions have continued to drop since then, largely due to increasing technology. California’s next climate target is to reduce emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. The Scoping Plan lays out how California will achieve this target.”

This is why California Democrats have worked so hard to keep moving the goal posts – we already are a clean state, with some of the cleanest air in the world.

Fortunately, EPA Administrator Zeldin is on to this climate grift. And the Cal Poly professors’ data and analysis proves this.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

One thought on “California Lettuce Growers Regulatory Compliance 1,400% Higher Per Acre Since 2006 When CA Climate Change Bill was Passed

  1. “Someone needs to ask California Democrat lawmakers if they are willing to destroy food production in California over the imaginary air quality crisis.”

    IMAGINARY air quality crisis perfectly describes the cover that is being used to enact such draconian economic hindrances on California farmers and ranchers….ostensibly to “save the planet from the existential threat of climate change” while they blithely encourage bunker-fuel burning tanker ships to import fuel to run the economy…

    Similar to the Democrat party’s use of “lawfare” in an attempt to hamper President Trump’s agenda, I believe they are using regulatory agencies and mandates to make the California economy and land values weaker so that the Chinese Communist Party’s entities can come in and buy up the most valuable land in the world on the cheap, because they need the capacity to feed their populace…
    And I believe that Newsom is on the take to the CCP, to enable this reduction in value by regulatory fiat, and collecting a market-maker fee from the CCP in the process…
    How else do we explain his “Great Wall” trip and photo op, the red carpet miraculous cleaning of San Franfreakshow for Xi’s visit and his BYD non-compete contract for PPE in the early days of the pandemic, plus his push for EV’s (also made by BYD) that are starting to appear in Mexico and will likely get a foothold in California with the current crop of grifting Democrats in charge…

    Chad Bianco has the more forceful approach to dealing with the over-regulation that characterizes California today, and I believe he has the spine and conviction (no pun intended) to crack down on these unelected bureaucratic roadblocks that are driving prices up, and providers OUT of California…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *