Home>Articles>California’s ‘Money-Grabbing Politicians’ Defend New Mileage Tax Buried in 2025 Budget Bill

California's gas taxes, February 2026. (Photo: California Energy Commission)

California’s ‘Money-Grabbing Politicians’ Defend New Mileage Tax Buried in 2025 Budget Bill

Democrats killed Assemblyman Carl DeMaio’s bill to ban MILEAGE TAX on drivers

By Katy Grimes, April 22, 2026 1:39 pm

Assemblyman Carl DeMaio reports that California Democrats just killed his bill to ban the imposition of a new MILEAGE TAX on drivers!

“WATCH as these money-grabbing politicians defend charging YOU 6-cents per mile – or $900 per year on top of gas/car taxes!” DeMaio says:

Democrats plan to charge drivers for driving anywhere.

DeMaio’s bill, AB 1783, would have prohibited local governments from imposing a mileage tax, which was buried in the Governor’s Budget trailer bill last year. And would prohibit a state agency from spending funds for the study, planning, or administration of a tax, fee, assessment, or charge based on VMT.

According to Assemblyman DeMaio, “Californians continue to be some of the most taxed people in the United States, with countless taxes in every aspect of life. As the cost-of-living crisis continues to grow, it is imperative that measures to create new taxes or increase taxes be stopped, whether statewide or at the local level. Californians pay the highest gas tax and car tax in the nation, and those funds are regularly diverted, preventing proper maintenance and repair of our roads. With local jurisdictions looking to impose mileage taxes, it is essential that Californians are financially protected from another misleading tax.”

The statewide Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) mitigation bank created by AB 130 in 2025 within the State Budget, “is an optional tool for developers to address significant Vehicle Miles Traveled impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act. Developers can pay into the state’s Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Fund (administered by HCD) instead of (or in addition to) other on-site or local mitigation measures. The fund supports affordable housing and related infrastructure in location-efficient areas to theoretically offset driving increases,” the Governor’s Land Use and Climate Innovation website says.

Contributions to this fund start in July 2026.

DeMaio says if a six- cent mileage tax is imposed, that’s approximately an extra $900 per year for driving an average of 15,000 miles.

A nine-cent mileage tax has been floated, which would add up to $1,350 for an average of 15,000 miles driven annually.

DeMaio said the taxes just for driving in California could add up to a total of $5,000 for a two-car family.

It gets worse because this new auto tax is on top of the gas taxes, the car taxes, and the registration fees they already charge you, DeMaio said. Every mile you drive, Democrats will tax.

California’s gas taxes, February 2026. (Photo: California Energy Commission)

The list of gas taxes in California is huge, totaling $4.34, according to the California Energy Commission.

California’s taxes on a tank of gas is the highest in the nation, according to the commission.

U.S. Energy Information Administration gas taxes. (Photo: EIA.gov)

Effective July 1, 2025, the main taxes and fees on a gallon of gasoline in California are approximately as follows:

  • Federal excise tax: 18.4 cents per gallon. This has been unchanged since 1993 and applies nationwide. 
  • California state excise tax (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax): 61.2 cents per gallon. This is indexed to inflation and adjusted annually on July 1; it rose from 59.6 cents effective July 1, 2025. It funds roads, highways, and transit.
  • State and local sales tax: 10–15+ cents per gallon. Varies by location (statewide base around 7.25% plus district taxes); for fuels, it’s often applied as a prepayment rate or percentage on the selling price (excluding some excise taxes). An average or effective rate for calculations is sometimes shown around 2.25% in certain breakdowns, adding roughly 10–15+ cents per gallon depending on the retail price and exact location. 
  • State Underground Storage Tank (UST) maintenance fee: About 2 cents per gallon. This funds cleanup of leaking tanks and is paid by tank owners/operators but passed through in prices.

These are regulatory compliance or program costs passed on to consumers (not traditional taxes but frequently broken out in price analyses):

  • Cap-and-Trade (Cap and Invest): Roughly 20–35+ cents per gallon (varies with carbon allowance prices).
  • Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS): Roughly 15–25+ cents per gallon (varies; proposals could increase this further).

These environmental program costs can add $0.40–0.50+ per gallon or more in some estimates, contributing to California’s higher pump prices alongside its unique reformulated gasoline requirements.

Total direct taxes/fees (federal + state excise + UST + average sales tax component): Around 70–90+ cents per gallon in combined state taxes/fees (highest in the U.S.), with broader estimates including federal reaching nearly $0.90/gallon. Exact totals vary by retail price (due to sales tax) and location, according to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. 

Governor’s Land Use and Climate Innovation website,  described as a “New Tool for Housing and Infrastructure : California’s Statewide VMT Mitigation Bank.”

“Providing another option for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects to mitigate vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts by helping to fund location-efficient affordable
housing and related infrastructure projects,” the slick website says.

It’s just another awful tax.

DeMaio has some clever X followers, who weighed in on this new mileage tax:

“The Constitution assumes a free republic where citizens can move about their own country without petty tyrants erecting tollbooths on basic mobility or turning roads into a surveillance-financed subscription service.”

“CA state government is already failing spectacularly at its core job (delivering decent roads for the insane taxes collected). Yet, now it want to pile on a new tracking-based fee/mileage tax.” 

“As a Californian, I’m sick of being treated like a cash cow that exists only to be milked harder while the barn falls down.”

“The barn falling down while they demand more rent,” DeMaio replied. “That is California in one sentence. They cannot fill a pothole but they want to charge you by the mile for the privilege of driving on roads you already paid for.”

“Keep in mind this is a poor tax. Wealthy people will never notice it but it will seriously harm commuters who already cant afford to leave closer to the places they work.  California being a tourist state has many many towns where this is the case.”

Here is what else the Governor’s Land Use and Climate Innovation website says about the mileage tax – it’s all about the environment:

Practical Mitigation Option: Gives CEQA projects an additional viable option to offset their VMT impacts.

Greater Certainty in CEQA: Creates a predictable pathway to reduce VMT impacts to less-than-significant levels, streamlining
environmental review (e.g., Mitigated Negative Declaration instead of a full Environmental Impact Report).

Long-Term Investment in Housing and Climate Goals: Establishes a sustainable financing mechanism that unlocks long-term investment into affordable housing and related infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with California’s climate goals.

The California Transportation Commission claims the state and local communities are facing a $31 billion shortfall over the next 10 years due to declining gas tax revenues. Maybe they should have thought about that before forcing electric vehicles and an all-electric grid on California residents. So this new tax is proposed to close this gap.

According to AB 1783 bill analysis:

State transportation funding is primarily supported by six different fuel taxes and vehicle fees. These sources are projected to generate $14.4 billion in 2024-25 as shown in the figure below. In recognition of the increased need for additional funding to maintain California’s transportation infrastructure, in 2017, the Legislature passed SB 1 (Beall), Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017, the Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB 1). SB 1 is forecast to provide roughly $6 billion in 2023-24 for road maintenance and additional funding for transit and safety projects. SB 1 also provided for an annual adjustment for inflation.

It’s just another tax to offset Democrats’ ever-increasing spending and perpetually growing budget, currently at a bloated $325 billion.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

8 thoughts on “California’s ‘Money-Grabbing Politicians’ Defend New Mileage Tax Buried in 2025 Budget Bill

  1. The headline should instead be “California’s ‘Money-Grabbing DEMOCRAT Politicians’ Defend New Mileage Tax Buried in 2025 Budget Bill.” Katy Grimes is so right that it’s just another tax to offset the Democrat legislative mafia’s ever-increasing spending and perpetually growing bloated budget. Democrats will just steal the extra taxes raised to support their criminal operations and support their illegal alien voter hordes? None of it will ever be spent to improve or maintain California’s roadways?

  2. “ California state excise tax (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax): 61.2 cents per gallon. This is indexed to inflation and adjusted annually on July 1; it rose from 59.6 cents effective July 1, 2025. It funds roads, highways, and transit.” Does this include repairs? Because it took them years to repair Watt Ave.. I drove down Madison Ave the other day and it was better from what I remember but not great. With this kind of tax, our roads should be like…other states. Smooth. I can’t imagine were all the moneys going.

  3. How many public employees are provided with state owned vehicles that are fueled at state expense? Judging from the number of E license plates on the road it seems quite a large number. Let them drive their own vehicles at their own expense so they can feel the impact like we do including the Electric vehicles that are charged at state expense. Legislators seem to constantly pass punitive bills that have no impact on them. Seems like the No Kings bunch want to keep us all subjects of the state and tax us to death.

  4. How is this going to work for off-road vehicles like tractors without odometer readings? And pickup trucks used on a farm or ranch. Some are not licensed if they don’t use public roads.

    1. If the vehicles are not licensed for the road I doubt there would be any tax. My problem is I drive several thousand miles a year on private roads and I would be taxed for that driving even though I must pay for my own road maintenance – gravel, tractor use, snow plowing etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *