Home>Articles>Paramount’s California Exit Threat Is Not a Hypothetical and Will Cause Real Economic Woes

Official Paramount Pictures print logo. (Photo: public domain)

Paramount’s California Exit Threat Is Not a Hypothetical and Will Cause Real Economic Woes

California stands to lose between 28,990 and 57,980 full-time jobs

By J. Mitchell Sances, September 15, 2026 2:30 am

California is about to find out what it costs to pick a fight with one of the last major studios still planted in the dirt of Los Angeles while then acting shocked when the studio looks at Georgia, Tennessee, and Texas and starts packing.

Paramount Skydance’s $110 billion bid for Warner Bros. Discovery is still tangled in Attorney General Rob Bonta’s multistate antitrust lawsuit. The deal’s “ticking fee” starts October 1: $7 million a day, every day, paid to Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders until the merger closes. Stretch that fight to the March 2027 trial date and the company is looking at $1.3 billion in delay costs before a judge has even ruled. Blow the deal up entirely and Paramount is on the hook for a termination fee that has been reported as high as $7 billion. Those are not press-release numbers. They are the kind of numbers that make a CEO start asking which state still wants a motion-picture industry.

David Ellison has already given his answer. If the merger is bottled up and the suit is not settled, Paramount begins leaving California on October 1. Bonta called that “blackmail”. Paramount’s lawyers called it a business climate. Both can be true. Only one of them has to make payroll.

A leaked analysis from the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation’s Institute for Applied Economics (commissioned by Paramount, which should be kept in mind, and then read anyway) puts the state’s exposure in language Sacramento usually reserves for wildfires. If the company “substantially or entirely” relocates, California stands to lose between 28,990 and 57,980 full-time jobs-years across all industries and between $10.6 billion and $21.2 billion a year in economic output. State and local tax collections could drop by roughly $585 million to $1.17 billion annually. Even the “slow walk” version of a departure, the report says, still costs thousands of job-years and more than a billion dollars in output over five years. Those figures include the quiet casualties: vendors, post houses, caterers, teamsters, and the household spending that follows a grip’s paycheck into a Valley apartment. The report also warns that converting Warner Bros. soundstages into offices or apartments would “permanently strip” the state of a century of purpose-built infrastructure.

Governor Gavin Newsom has spent the last year doing what he always does when a headline industry starts eyeing the door: he waves tax credits. He doubled the Film and Television Tax Credit program to $750 million. In August, with Ellison’s exit threat already on the record, Paramount Television Studios and CBS Studios still walked away with more than $37 million in credits for projects including Viola Davis’s Ascent and a Clueless sequel. Newsom called it proof that California remains “the entertainment capital of the world.” Ellison is still naming Georgia, Tennessee, and Texas. A subsidy is not a settlement. A ribbon-cutting is not a ticking fee. This is the lose-lose situation built by Sacramento.

If Bonta and the coalition stop the merger, California does not get a morality play. It gets a real bill. Tens of thousands of jobs. Billions in output. Stages that become condos. Crews that follow the work to states that still pretend production is an honor instead of a hostage. Those are not think-tank hypotheticals about “media diversity” in 2032. They are rent, health insurance, and union hours in 2026. That is the devil we know. It is ugly. It is also countable. It is not a suicide pill worth swallowing so that an attorney general can say he stared down a studio.

If the merger goes through, Paramount becomes something this town has not seen in a generation: a single entertainment beast with studios, broadcast stations, cable networks, and streaming pipes under one roof. That concentration is not imaginary either. It is the whole point of Bonta’s lawsuit, and it is the reason the Writers Guild is in court beside him. A combined Paramount–Warner would have a voice in what gets made, what gets booked into theaters, and what sits on the basic-cable bundle. Power like that should make anyone who cares about a competitive industry sit up.

Furthermore, there is a second problem stacked on the first. To finance the takeover, Paramount went to Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha. Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, Abu Dhabi’s L’Imad, and the Qatar Investment Authority are slated to hold a combined 38.5 percent of the merged company’s non-voting equity with aggregate indirect foreign ownership near 49.5 percent. Paramount has asked the FCC to bless that structure and even to allow those stakes to grow. The company swears the Ellison family and RedBird will keep every vote and every board seat. Perhaps they will. Money that large does not need a nameplate on the boardroom door to be heard when a script, a documentary, or a news division decision becomes inconvenient in the Gulf. That is the devil we do not fully know.

Influence is harder to spreadsheet than a soundstage going dark. It is also a fight that can be had in the open: at the FCC, in Congress, in shareholders’ meetings, and in the same noisy American public that still knows how to boycott a movie. Hypothetical capture is a problem. It is not the same species of problem as 58,000 jobs leaving the state because Sacramento decided an antitrust theory was worth more than the industry that pays the theory’s subjects.

The choice, then, is not between purity and corruption. It is between a concrete economic amputation and a concentrated company whose foreign limited partners can be watched, regulated, and fought as their fingerprints appear. One of those outcomes hits grips in Burbank next winter. The other is a long argument about who shapes the culture. California can survive the argument. It has been having that argument since the Hays Code. It cannot survive pretending that a studio departure is a negotiating flourish.

Bonta says he will not be bullied. Fine. Governors and attorneys general are not supposed to be bullied. They are also not supposed to light the furniture on fire to prove they own the house. Newsom can keep announcing tax credits. Ellison can keep naming friendlier states. The October 1 clock does not care which man has the better line.

Settle the suit, or prepare to explain to the people who actually make the pictures why the principle was worth their work. The devil California knows is already standing in the lot with a box in his hands. The devil it doesn’t know can wait its turn in the credits.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *