Home>Articles>Power Plays

The California Aqueduct. (Photo: CA State Water Project)

Power Plays

PG&E plans to destroy Scott Dam and the Cape Horn diversion facility

By Chris Coulombe, March 13, 2024 5:23 pm

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

― Upton Sinclair

On Feb. 6, Pacific Gas and Electric dropped a bomb on residents of California’s North Coast: the company announced it will request the decommissioning and destruction of Scott Dam and Cape Horn Dam, removing a major water source for the iconic wine country and 600,000 residents of Sonoma, Marin, and Mendocino counties.

Eel River and the Potter Valley Project. (Photo: Humboldt.gov.org)

Mendocino County 1st District Supervisor Glenn McGourty summed it up: “It is a shock, and we are still kind of reeling from it,” he said.

By submitting its plans to destroy Scott Dam and the Cape Horn diversion facility, PG&E, a quasi-state agency, has shown us three valuable data points:

  • They have no further interest in the dams
  • It is up to North Coast residents to protect our water supply, quality of life, and cost of Living
  • They use elected officials to increase their topline

Sadly, our region’s Congressional representative, Jared Huffman, is ready to help move the story along for PG&E’s benefit without a fight. He is dutifully “critical” of PG&E – always an easy target. Yet, he supports removing Scott and Cape Horn Dam and is silent on an inevitable truth: Water will become scarcer and thus more expensive for his constituents to the benefit of his donors. Current studies place the destruction project alone at almost $400M.

Incredibly, in an article posted to his website, Huffman said he intends to make PG&E’s destruction of Scott Dam slow and expensive.

“I urge people not to get overly excited,” said Rep. Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) Wednesday when asked to respond to the decision by PG&E, explaining that “PG&E is trying to get out from under the project as quickly and as cheaply as possible … but it’s not going to be fast and it’s not going to be cheap.” 

Who does Huffman think will pay for PG&E’s decommission-and-destruction project?

Translation for all PG&E customers: Expect even higher rates for a long time. And once these dams are gone, by all official accounts, they are gone for good.

Thanks to Gov. Gavin Newsom and Rep. Huffman.

Power Disconnected

This line of reasoning perfectly demonstrates the supreme disconnect many of our elected officials in California have when engaging in their political theater. Given the status of the region, state, and nation, ideology cannot outweigh our reality; at this point, it is causing dire consequences in California and America. And Californians are paying for it dearly.

PG&E’s decision and Huffman’s complicity puts the region on a perilous path if we allow it to continue; more importantly, I believe it presents an opportunity for North Coast residents to discuss our water security and political environment honestly.

It is plainly evident that we cannot count on current politicians or executives of faux corporations. The ultimate stakeholders in this matter are the residents, families, business owners, farmers, fishers, foresters, vintners, and restaurateurs whose lives and livelihoods depend on access to cheap, plentiful, clean water.

If our current representative in Congress will not lead the effort to save this region and our existential resources, then we will.

Jared Huffman continues to demonstrate his disconnect from the interests of this district. While he strives to impose higher costs on PG&E, which PG&E customers will ultimately bear, the company donates tens of thousands of dollars to his political committee every year and millions to Newsom. PG&E feeds them money; they feed PG&E justifications for further rate hikes to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

Rate hikes equal more of your money, and for what? Hint: Taxes are in percentages. The more you pay for an item, the more the government receives via tax receipts, including corporate taxes. Thus, the moral hazard of government.

If further justification of true alignment is needed, ask yourself if you have heard Huffman or Newsom speak out against PG&E’s continued delays in paying the fire victims – or pushing back on discussions that PG&E’s fire victim trust will not have sufficient funds to compensate victims fully. That was seven years ago, and residents still have not been made whole – even after PG&E posted significant profits last quarter. Where are our leaders calling for justice?

Robert De Niro, as Sam Rothstein, taught us in the movie “Casino:” “Either he was in on it, or forgive me for saying this, he was too dumb to see what was going on. Either way, I cannot have a man like that working here.”

Power Supply

I do not believe the problem is that Huffman is a Democrat. After all, his fellow Democrat and Sonoma County Rep. Mike Thompson wrote a formal memorandum to PG&E on Dec. 6,, 2023, highlighting his concerns about removing Scott Dam.

Unsurprisingly, Rep. Thompson’s concerns match my Oct. 15, 2023, Marin IJ article. Namely, removing significant water storage will impose unacceptable costs upon North Coast residents, including higher prices and higher regional fire risk. 

Another Democrat congressman, Lake County’s John Garamendi, raised similar concerns in his Oct. 16, 2020, memorandum to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC): “I strongly oppose draining Lake Pillsbury reservoir by removing Scott Dam,” Garamendi wrote. “The planning process will not be adequate until every community impacted by this project has a voice in the process.”

Once PG&E’s May 2023 Flow Variance Request is approved – which is already in review and can occur within months – Mendocino, Sonoma, and Marin counties will need to replace that water source lost from reduced diversion into the Russian River.

In June 2022, the Marin County civil grand jury called into question Marin Municipal Water District’s (MMDW) ability to meet water needs stated in their Water Resource Plan 2040. The grand jury report further calls for MMWD to increase current water supplies by 10,000 acre-feet (AF) annually for four years. That is with the 60,000 AF presently in Lake Pillsbury, which flows to the Russian River and is available for transfer to Marin County.

MMWD is currently carrying $139 million in bond debts; two years ago, they discussed putting forward another bond of approximately $111 million to send a pipeline across the Richmond Bridge to access more water sources because “Marin almost ran out of water” in 2021.

This bridge pipeline is the least expensive of the options available to solve the present water shortage. MMWD scuttled the proposal after political winds told them there was little appetite from the already overwhelmed taxpayers. But we can rest assured the proposal will return.

Presently approved rate hikes will increase MMWD ratepayers’ water costs for a family of 4 using 55 gallons daily from $115 a month to $130 a month this summer. Then, it will go to $145 next summer and $160 in summer 2026. It is important to note that this increase is solely to rebuild financial reserves, account for inflation, and increase the current capital improvement/ maintenance budget.

None of these cost increases account for funding any projects to increase water storage capacity, nor does it address the loss of water supply from the voluntary destruction of Scott Dam at Lake Pillsbury. A destruction project slated to cost ratepayers or taxpayers $400 million to remove – not including interest and ever-likely overruns.

The Plug 

Huffman has suggested a desalination (desal) plant on the Petaluma River to solve MMWD’s pending water shortage. The water district’s viability study determined the project would cost ratepayers between $121 million to $194 million to build and produce approximately 5,325 acre-feet at a price of $1,800 to $2,900 per acre-foot. Compare this to the current cost per acre-foot of $300-$450.

Note that the water produced by this desal plant would only cover 13% of the civil grand jury’s total recommended increase. We should also note that the water produced will be split between Novato’s water district and MMWD, reducing its shortage offset to MMWD.

Let us set aside that an “environmentalist” is pushing a solution that will severely impact the local ecosystem through brine discharge and salinity increases to either the Petaluma River or aquifer, likely both.

Let us focus on how PG&E is playing Huffman to pad their topline numbers at the expense of the citizens: Desal plants are widely known to have massive energy demands. Energy demands that would be fulfilled by … PG&E.

This region already has power grid shortfalls, experiencing brownouts, blackouts, and public safety power shutoff events frequently, particularly during summer months – otherwise known as the “please do not charge your EVs so we do not crash the grid” season in California.

If we plug a massively energy-intensive water source into a grid that regularly fails during the hottest times of the year while we have the least amount of water in supply, which one gets energy priority in the scenario we all can see happening?

Do we stop producing water so that people receive power to their air conditioning units so they do not die of heat exhaustion in their homes or lose their food to spoilage? Or do we produce sufficient water when our reservoirs are at their lowest, and people need it most?

How much will you be willing to pay for water when it is not readily available? What “flex pricing” will we face for access to the existential resource? This is not a choice an advanced nation should have to make in 2024. We should remember that the community that would lose or keep its power access (Petaluma) is not the same community that would lose or keep the water access (Marin).

So, PG&E creates dire conditions for the region, forcing us to make unsustainable financial choices to “guarantee water and power for all” to justify ever more rate hike approvals from the CPUC.

Power Play

In addition to PG&E’s recent announcement regarding its intent to destroy existing power generation and water storage facilities in the North Coast, its poorly timed earnings report shows a staggering profit surge of almost 25% in the fourth quarter of last year, totaling $2.24 billion.

Be sure to note that this earnings report was for the period prior to its most recently approved requested rate hike of 13%, which took effect Jan. 1, 2024. Even with outrageous profits flowing in and a rate hike that went into effect last month, PG&E has already requested yet another rate hike in 2024. What will it do when it comes time to take down Scott and Cape Horn Dams? Or upgrade the power plants? And improve the grid necessary to supply the new desal plant?

This scenario is analogous to the scene in “Yellowstone’s” 1893 series where the Dutton son remarks that the refrigerator salesman is not selling refrigerators; he is selling electricity and the subsequent continual reliance on the power company.

It should be evident that those currently in elected office do not represent our interests, and our monopoly water and power provider can proceed in its interest carte blanche. PG&E is taking blatant advantage of the voters of northern California, causing substantial financial harm to the residents and our future.

Californians face an affordability and leadership crisis, and the continuing increases in costs have become unaffordable and untenable for most.

We can see that we cannot continue down this path.

Powering Up

All of the congressmen from adjoining districts oppose the removal of dams in the region because it is an unsustainable and catastrophic path. Most citizens aware of the project are adamantly opposed to this path; unfortunately, most are unaware.

Ultimately, it is up to the people to improve our quality of life and increase our natural resource security. The fastest path to a better future is through the ballot if we choose to do so.

I encourage you to overcome the air of malaise exacted upon us by underperforming political troupes and take hold of our future by voting with your head. Ask yourself about the definition of insanity: doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome. Critically assess the situation you exist in today – do you want change? Vote for your future, not against the fears expressed to you by those trying to maintain their power.

Please take what you read here and apply it to your region; the North Bay is not PG&E’s only playground. Either way, following the March election, I will announce a symposium of leaders to chart a path for the North Coast’s water security.

It is time to stand. Our residents deserve no less.

“The power is in the People and politics We address. Always do your best.”

– Tupac

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Latest posts by Chris Coulombe (see all)
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

13 thoughts on “Power Plays

  1. It’s good to see someone running for Congress on a vital issue like this one, as Chris Coulombe is doing, and educating the rest of California at the same time. Maybe we are actually on the road to removing the deadwood from CA’s political class. Best of luck.

  2. I was working on a project just down steam from Bullards Bar reservoir, it was a penstock with power generation.
    It was sold to Yuba county by PG&E. T he inspector told me that PG&E is selling a lot of their Hydro-Electric power generating plants. The take way I got was that PG&E used to be in the power generating business, relying on a series of dams to provide cheap and reliable power. Now, PG&E seems to be more in energy broker business, moving power around through it’s power line infrastructure and buying state mandated green energy from solar and wind provided by different entities. The key to this is….State mandated!
    In other words…..Central Planing….

  3. Green is all about destroying civilization. Once you get rid of power and water society will collapse which is their intent. I can only hope greens are the first victims of their own plans.

  4. This is the dumbest take on the Potter Valley Project I have seen yet. Forcing a private company to keep, or asking taxpayers to foot the bill for old dams that are falling apart is absurd. These dams just don’t make financial sense to keep. We can keep wasting money on failing facilities like these, driving up our debt, or invest in modern water infrastructure that will meet the needs of the future. The real issue at hand here is relying on a power utility for water supply, which is a mistake. PG&E is not in the water supply business and the faster they get out of it the better. Investments are better made elsewhere and giving PG&E and taxpayer handout to keep these dams is a mistake.

    1. Hello, Ryan. Where do you see a comment about forcing PG&E to keep the dam or asking taxpayers to foot the bill—one I will add they will pay for under current proposals regardless?

      When was the last time PG&E made improvements to the hydro facilities? 40 years ago? 50 years ago? When they requested flow reductions in 2004, which cut the flow by 50%, it subsequently impacted the power they generated and, therefore, the profit they generated. It’s almost like they are long-term thinkers…

      We are talking about our water supply here. There is no greater existential issue at hand except maybe sunlight—which we do not have much legislative power over (thankfully). It would greatly benefit you to have some knowledge about this subject or any subject you intend to disparage publicly. It is also counterintuitive to actively and intentionally advocate for the removal of your water source. I wonder what other species would do that?

    2. PG&E isn’t in the “water supply” business like you said, that is the responsibility of water districts as told in this article. The problem is that PG&E is responsible for the dams that create the impoundment reservoirs that these water districts depend on to draw water from. What exactly do think happens to these reservoirs and thus the thousands of acres of water they contain that people need for drinking water (among other things) when the dams are removed? Or right….we already know when we look at the complete disaster that has befallen the Klamath valley after they removed the dams there.

  5. Thanks Chris,
    Very well said.
    Having in-depth knowledge of the Potter Valley hydroelectric project, I can attest that the 12 Megawatt facility can no longer generate enough profit to continue operations primarily due to water flow restrictions imposed by all of the agencies and entities involved.
    The company must generate profit to attract investors due to the application of Inverse Condemnation.
    https://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/20190618-Commission_on_Catastrophic_Wildfire_Report_FINAL_for_transmittal.pdf

    Finding 3. The current interpretation of inverse condemnation, holding utilities strictly
    liable for any wildfire caused by utility equipment regardless of standard of care or negligence,
    imperils the viability of the state’s utilities, customers’ access to affordable energy and clean
    water, and the state’s climate and clean energy goals; it also, does not equitably socialize the
    costs of utility-caused wildfires.

    Finding 4. The increasing costs of capital and the risk of bankruptcy associated with the
    strict liability interpretation of inverse condemnation doctrine for water companies, publicly￾owned utilities, and investor-owned utilities is harmful to wildfire victims, ratepayers, and the
    utilities themselves.

  6. Don’t forget Jared Huffman before becoming a Congressman was the Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an organization that has weaponized water supply against rural Californians for decades.

  7. These politics just don’t make any sense any more.
    Roman law understood that water affects all down stream, that it is life.
    The power of the sun conveys water up to a gradient, gradient = power, power+ dam,=
    reservoir, reservoir= battery; battery discharge;= life downstream.
    Not harnessing the God given resource is just foolish.
    PG&E and water supply are one of the same, no dams; no water supply in the summer.
    PG&E is not the company that it was 30+ years ago when its business was generating power, Period!
    AB32 of 2006 mandated PG&E go from it’s existing infrastructure (dams) to having to go “green”, taking the focus away from maintenance, and focus on the GOVERNMENT MANDATE of green energy, there by making PG&E more or less a state entity.
    Hydroelectric is NOT considered “renewable”, (go figure) only solar, wind and geothermal are.
    This whole ‘green’ agenda is a fools errand, it IS central planing.
    We are in a ONE party state since 2000, with a 60% + majority.
    California, look in the mirror.

  8. Thank you Chris! We the people who live in Lake Pillsbury have been trying to spread the truth about the Dam for several years now. Nobody is listening to us little people. Governor Newsom won’t even bring up Lake Pillsbury/Scott’s Dam in his speeches when talking about the dam removal. He is clueless of the catastrophe this will cause…Or he could care less !! This dam supplies water for soooo many . The fire that went through Lake Pillsbury a few years ago ….if it wasn’t for the Lake we would have ALL lost our homes. There were 7 planes scooping water from the lake to save us from burning up. How will we be saved if the Dam is removed? I could go on and on about this subject. This dam needs to be saved. I sure hope you can help us….we can’t fight this alone. Thank you!!!

    1. My pleasure, Lora. We must fight, Newsom knows the impact and couldn’t care less. This only works if we all stand. Thank you for pushing this for so long, it will not be easy but it will be worth it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *