The Greenberg Brief: San Francisco’s GOP Party Paralysis
March primaries give Republicans an opportunity for change
By Richie Greenberg, November 27, 2023 2:50 am
There are thirty-five thousand registered Republicans in San Francisco, but you’d barely know it, under the guidance and rule of the local party’s leadership committee.
Representing nearly six percent of the eligible voter base of San Francisco’s total five hundred thousand registered voters, the SFGOP is in shambles and has been for years. Little meaningful money flows in, and even less flows out, needed to support what few candidates run for key offices locally anyway. Infighting, massive ego inflation, contentious monthly meetings featuring legal chest puffing and a floundering executive committee ensure the party will remain irrelevant in local politics for the near future. Will it improve? After all, thirty-five thousand is a truly significant voter block.
What’s even more puzzling is how the twenty-five member local party leadership committee (known as the San Francisco RCCC, the “Republican County Central Committee” or SFGOP) continues on the path in supporting its own internal leaders amid platform paralysis and sustained insignificance to the voters. Who’s in charge, and why?
John Dennis is the chairman of the county SFGOP. There’s a curious love-hate relationship with him, if indeed the city even knows him by name at all. He took the reins of the party in 2019 when previous chair Jason Clark suddenly resigned to take a job in Washington DC, leaving party leadership in disarray- resulting in infighting, backstabbing, and further descent into insignificance. Ruling the party with an iron fist and constant threats to expel committee members, many elected and appointed delegates of the RCCC quit due to Dennis, including yours truly, in 2020 and more recent.
At such a critical juncture in time in San Francisco’s rollercoaster history as today, when residents and business owners are disgusted with city hall leaders, with the lack of meaningful action on crime, serious fiscal mismanagement and corrupt officials indicted, the potential of influence by (and options to voters for) conservatives in San Francisco should seem a no-brainer. Arguably, there has been no better time than right this moment for moderate, reasonably-viable Republicans to run for the city’s elected offices. I’m talking key offices, such as mayor; for any of the six available seats on the city council (Board of Supervisors); for city attorney, and more. Some political strategists even profess a value of running a Republican placeholder candidate, just for show, for exposure.
Contrary to popular belief the San Francisco Republican Party is not a branch of the national Republican party (the RNC). There is no financial nor leadership connection. The SFGOP receives no guidance from national party chairwoman Ronna McDaniel. No political donors’ funding trickles down from the RNC to San Francisco’s leadership committee. You’ll be hard pressed to even recognize any of the names on the roster of SFGOP delegates, and there is a great internal schism today over support for-and disdain for – Donald Trump. Yet local party leaders fail, time and time again, to make this important distinction, especially when pressed (or insulted) publicly. For example, the SFGOP openly accepts and embraces the LGBTQ issue yet local voters don’t know this. The Democrats exploit this, succeeding in pounding the GOP into the dirt on the issue.
Previous SFGOP chairman Jason Clark warned delegates prior to John Dennis’ rein that unless serious efforts were undertaken to make the local party relevant, with exposure in the local media, with courting of journalists and meaningful outreach to voters, the party will be doomed. He asserted the SFGOP would become a mere social club. And that’s where they headed. For an example: Under Clark, the SFGOP created a special “rapid response team”: Key media-friendly committee members who were comfortable speaking on camera and writing press releases would monitor news in San Francisco, ready to react to developing stories with a mere moments notice. Keeping the SFGOP in the headlines (and in Republican voters’ inboxes) is, of course, an easy way to gain exposure and relevancy. But once new chairman John Dennis took control, he dismantled rapid responses in favor of a one-person reactionary voice: himself. Dennis made it very clear it was he alone authorized to speak to media.
Five times, five attempts, Mr. Dennis tried over the years to knock Nancy Pelosi out of office in Washington D.C. Concurrently serving as both a delegate on the RCCC and more recently as chairman, he ran quixotic campaigns which essentially caused neglect of SFGOP party chairman’s priorities, in favor of utilizing resources and efforts to pretend he had any chance in hell to unseat the insanely beloved Speaker Emerita. The few SFGOP fundraisers which have been held feature Dennis (to boost his profile) alongside the varied keynote speakers, and netted paltry donations above event break-even cost. Generally, there’s little money to support any local Republican candidates, and an SFGOP endorsement garners little attention across the city. They don’t sponsor ballot measures nor organize rallies at city hall. They make little to no honest effort to promote change for the good of the city. Myriad opportunities exist, yet they essentially coordinate nothing. There’s just too much internal strife, leading to sustained failure.
We are again approaching another important election season. You can make a difference as a San Francisco registered Republican specifically. Cross-party, independent, and NPP voters are not eligible. The SFGOP party leadership elections (Primaries) to be held March 5th, 2024 are solely for Republican party-registered voters, which will see an actual opportunity to voice approval (or not) of the choices of elected delegates to the RCCC. Believe me, this is an often-overlooked opportunity to have direct influence. The current SFGOP leaders can be found here: [ https://www.sfgop.org/about ].
San Francisco is divided into east side and west side representatives for AD17 and AD19 (assembly districts). The list of current candidates can be found here [https://sf.gov/reports/march-2024/candidates-march-5-2024-presidential-primary-election#republican-county-central-committee-ad-17 ] and here [ https://sf.gov/reports/march-2024/candidates-march-5-2024-presidential-primary-election#republican-county-central-committee-ad-19 ]. Chairman John Dennis is running in AD19; send him a message at his publicly-listed GOP site email address: chair@sfgop.org .
- Gavin, Meet Harmeet Dhillon, Again - December 11, 2024
- BREAKING: Recall Launched Targeting SF Supervisor Engardio - December 3, 2024
- Greenberg: Good Riddance to Controversy and Betrayal - December 3, 2024
I agree with most of your article with one area of disagreement. In 1976 President Regan articulated that the Republican platform offered “a banner of bold unmistakable colors, with no pale pastel colors.” When Republicans do not offer a bold difference and attempts to be a “democrat lite” alternative it does not motivate and inspire folks. The SFGOP is embroiled with petty issues and the current group of members is as you stated only interested in “self”. When that happens the party sputters and falls. Until a member comes along that truly puts the residents of San Francisco over their own personal gain/greed the party will be stuck on stupid.
Hal, what struck me about this description of the SFGOP is the similarity to my local GOP organization. The current leader of our GOP could be another John Dennis. Our guy keeps putting himself on the ballot against the Democrat incumbent and never receives more than 25% of the vote. At some point you would think he would get the message and let someone else try. The previous leader was personable, never ran and just administered the organization.
It would be reasonable to identify 1994 and Proposition 187 as the year the California GOP fell into a downward spiral. From that year forward, it’s become an increasingly xenophobic rural-only party, despite Arnold Schwarzenegger’s best effort to bring it back.
Raymond, I don’t know what county you live in, but I have qualified to be on the ballot for one of our local GOP Central Committee seats.
Science facts, I respectfully disagree with your premise about Prop 187. The demise of the Republican party in California started after redistricting from the 2000 census. If I recall correctly the seats were gerrymandered to provide safe seats for both parties instead of winning elections based upon ideas and policies. The democrats have been exploiting this gerrymander scheme every sense. They have exploded the size of the administrative ranks of the State government which has allowed them to gain more power and elected seats.
Geez, between this dismal report out of the North, and Steven Frank reporting similar dysfunction down South, why isn’t Botox McDaniel intervening to get these matters resolved???
@Science Facts
All Prop 187 did was change Mexican law so that dual citizens could still buy Mexican land and retain family land ownership rights. Until 1995 naturalized Mexicans could not buy Mexican land in most cases and lost most inheritance rights regarding family ejidos lands etc. A very big deal as 90%+ of Mexicans who got legal status under the 1986 Amnesty were low skilled rural peasants.
So before the Mexican government changed the law the naturalization rate for Mexicans was by far the lowest of all immigrant groups. Less than 20% the rate of all other groups. After the Mexican government changed the law a huge voter reg drive was made by the Democratic Party (and Mexican government reps) and the naturalization rate of Mexicans although still much lower than other groups added several million new “voters ” for the state Dem Party.
The real death knell was in 1996 when Sanchez showed that you could get 2000 illegal voters counted, defeating Bob Dornan, and the state Republican Party would do nothing to have the stolen election overturned. So now you have the situation were many hundred of thousands of illegals are registered to vote Dem accounting for the winning margin in half a dozen Congressional seats and a good quarter of state Assembly / Senate seats.
When the state Rep Party dumps it’s Prop 13 fettish of the last three decades then it will start winning important elections again. This obsession has totally destroyed the state party as a viable party to attract independent voters etc., leaving it as little more than the party of cranks . Which is all it has been since the late 1990’s,
The purpose of a major political party is to win elections. Not “send messages”. Or be some kind of comfort blanket for a minority fringe.
Symptoms of the disease. The CAGOP is no better. They go along to get along. Do just enough to stay relevant and in their best interest. It’s a feeder team to go to DC. The CAGOP leadership enjoys the limelight and won’t do any more than necessary to stay in the limelight but no real fight to win. No money because republicans know it will never be enough to win or even used to win. They like their conventions and being in politics without actually winning in politics. Until that shifts CA will continue to loose the battle of the Conservative principles. 🙏🏻🇺🇸
Are there any useful cuonty Rep parties in CA?