Home>Articles>OPINION: Newsom and The Skin Color Marxists 

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks at his recall election rally on at Culver City High School, Culver City, CA, Sept. 5, 2021. (Photo: Maxim Elramsisy/Shutterstock)

OPINION: Newsom and The Skin Color Marxists 

Newsom oppressed Californians of all colors by forcing them to close their businesses while he went about his business

By A.J. Rice, December 17, 2022 9:43 am

The German national socialists had a policy called Sippenhaft, which they used to punish the relatives of people who’d done something the government of national socialist Germany disapproved of.

The idea being to instill fear – and guilt – in everyone. If you did something, your wife and children would pay for it.

Heinrich Himmler, the head of the notorious SS that was the main enforcement arm of national socialist policies, explained: “This man has committed treason; his blood is bad; there is traitor’s blood in him; that must be wiped out. And in the blood feud the entire clan was wiped out down to the last member. And so, too, will the enemies of national socialist Germany be wiped out down to the last member.”

The socialist governor of California, Gavin Newsom, is in favor of enacting a similar policy that involves a payout of $569 billion – one that goes even farther than punishing merely the relatives of people who affronted the government.

Newsom wants to make anyone who happens to be white “help” pay out about a quarter-million dollars each in reparations to anyone who happens to be black – even if the white person’s ancestors had nothing to do with what was done to the ancestors of those black people.

What about Asians and Hispanics in California? Are they white adjacent? Time for them to pay up too for zero reason whatsoever?

“We are looking at reparations on a scale that is the largest since Reconstruction,” says Jovan Scott Lewis, a professor of African Diaspora Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.

According to an article in the New York Post, the payment of these reparations will “shrink the wealth gap between white and black Californians.”

Which of course it would, just the same as robbing Peter to pay Paul increases the net worth of Paul. But it also decreases the net worth of Peter. Wouldn’t that oblige Paul’s descendants to pay reparations to Peter’s descendants, to make them whole? This of course is madness.

It is not exculpatory that a white person living in California today didn’t have ancestors in California – or the United States – when the ancestors of black people living in California today were enslaved or otherwise oppressed.

And which black people, exactly?

Does dummy Newsom not know that California fought on the side of the Union in the Civil War?

A great deal of genealogical divining would need to be done to establish a viable claim – under the usual rules of evidence; how to divine whether a white person living today had an ancestor who oppressed black people in the past?

And how much did the white person’s ancestor oppress the black person’s ancestor?

No worries.

Any person with white skin will do, even if that person’s white ancestors had nothing to do with slavery or any other form of oppressing the descendants of slaves.

Because socialist politicians such as Newsom view everything through a collective lens. It is beside the point whether an individual white person – living or dead – imposed harm on a specific black person, living or dead. The point, insofar as Newsom and other advocates of financial Sippenhaft see it, is that all whites are collectively guilty for the sins of all whites and by dint of those collective sins, owe a collective debt.

Thus California’s Reparations Task Force – which Newsom “tasked” with imposing a latter-day version of Sippenhaft upon all whites for what was done to some blacks, particularly as regards to “discriminatory housing practices” during the period 1933-1977.

According to the task force, black people living in California during that time were defrauded of about $5,000 annually in the form of lost equity in homes that were eminent-domained by the state to make way for roads or nicer homes – though it does not appear to have occurred to the task force that it wasn’t “white people” that did this so much as the government that did it.

Individual people – white or black – do not have the legal power to eminent domain anyone’s home. Only the government has the power to do that. Nor do they have the power to incarcerate anyone, another one of the sins putatively laid at the feet of yesterday’s white people – along with the “devaluation” of black health care and other such affronts.

But it won’t be the government that’s paying out the reparations to make amends for all of that. It will be the people of California who are forced to pay the government of California the taxes that the government then uses to pay reparations – and take the credit for having paid out.

Naturally, there will be no exemption from these taxes for black California taxpayers, whose tax money will be redistributed to other black people in direct cash payments or payments in kind (e.g., free tuition, housing grants and so on) as “reparations” for the collective sins of white people.

In other words, it’s no skin off Newsom’s nose.

Besides, how many of these black people voted for Newsom instead of African American Republican Larry Elder? When they feel the pain I suppose Gavin can say, you’re welcome.

Notwithstanding he’s white – and let’s not forget how much he oppressed Californians of all colors, by forcing them to close their businesses while he went about his business, and often without wearing the “mask” he made others – black and white – wear.

What about reparations for them?

The people actually – demonstrably and specifically – oppressed by a very specific, readily identifiable person?

Socialists aren’t interested in that.

What they are interested in is power – over everyone, black and white.

Newsom has established himself as excelling at that.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Latest posts by A.J. Rice (see all)
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

9 thoughts on “OPINION: Newsom and The Skin Color Marxists 

  1. It seems to me that the US (and other governments) are using the same faulty logic by freezing or taking property belonging to wealthy Russians. What if the Governments of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria went after properties and assets of Elon Musk, Bill Gates, George Soros, Jeff Bezos, Donald Trump?

  2. Newsom’s a WEF tool and follows the playbook verbatim, his ultimate dream would be a race war.
    Does anyone know the parameters? Bits and pieces…. 2.8 million African Americans in CA?; People of all
    color who experienced housing discrimination from 1930-77 only? A demand for $800k by one of the people
    who spoke at a meeting, based on cost of a new-build home? Proposed payout of $223k? So he throws out
    the idea of a huge payout $569 billion, probably hired ‘Soros-backed agitators’ to attend meetings stir the pot,
    so when they don’t qualify it turns into a melee in the interest of social justice and equity. He’s so predictable.

    1. Marilyn… Same with student loan forgiveness handouts, getting people’s hopes up for lifechanging free money only to be dashed by cruel Republicans (set up like a bowling pin), these are evil diabolical people

  3. If you are black don’t think for a moment that the elites actually favor you. You are being used and will be thrown under the bus at the first opportune moment when you are no longer useful to their agenda of total power and subjugation. Don’t ever forget for a moment that Democrats are the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They have not changed their racism, just their tactics.

    The first thing you will find is that they will take at least 50% of that money back in taxes right out of the box! There will be all sorts of strings too! Count on that!

  4. Democrat leaders like Gov. Newsom who mandated the experimental mRNA shots that have injured and killed thousands of people need to be held accountable and need to be brought before tribunals for crimes against humanity.

  5. RIGHT YOU ARE , CW BLACK LIVES ONLY MATTER ONCE EVERY 4 YEARS, AND TRULY, IF YOU WANT PAYMENT , GET IT FROM THE COUNTRY THAT FIRST SOLD BLACKS INTO SLAVERY, AND ONE OF THE FIRST SLAVE OWNER WAS A MAN NAMED, Mr. Anthony Johnson a black man. Therefore, Mr. Anthony Johnson must be recognized as the father of legalized slavery in America. So, the father of legalized, court-sanctioned slavery in America was a black man. The official U.S. Census of 1830 showed that 3,375 free blacks owned 12,740 black slaves. The U. S. Census of 1860 showed almost 27 million whites lived in the country and fewer than 385,000 reported owning slaves. That’s about 1.4% of the total white population.
    According to this same 1860 census, 261,988 southern blacks were not slaves. The same census list several blacks owning 65 or more slaves. Blacks in one South Carolina city claimed over $1.5 million in taxable property, including slaves valued in excess of $300,000.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *