Home>Articles>Pro 2A Groups File Lawsuit to Stop Gov. Newsom’s Attempt to Destroy Youth Shooting Sports

Young boy given advice on clay pigeon shooting. (Photo: verityjohnson, Shutterstock)

Pro 2A Groups File Lawsuit to Stop Gov. Newsom’s Attempt to Destroy Youth Shooting Sports

AB 2571 violates rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments

By Katy Grimes, July 8, 2022 1:44 pm

Several pro-gun groups filed a lawsuit Friday to stop Gov. Newsom’s attempt to put an end to youth shooting and shooting sports.

AB 2571 authored by Assemblywoman Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda), and sponsored by Governor Gavin Newsom, and passed entirely along party lines, outlaws firearm industry members from advertising or marketing firearm-related products to minors.

Gov. Newsom just signed AB 2571 into law June 30th, only to have the lawsuit filed to halt this legislation a week later.

“Today CRPA, Second Amendment Foundation, Gun Owners of California, and others are standing up to Newsom and his propaganda. These groups filed a lawsuit (below) to stop the further implementation of this unconstitutional law and are seeking an immediate injunction to block the law from taking effect.”

According to bill analysis, “AB 2571 Prohibits firearm industry members from marketing or advertising firearm-related products to minors and authorizes public attorneys and injured plaintiffs to bring a civil action to enforce the prohibition, obtain injunctive relief, and seek either civil penalties, or, in some cases, damages for harms caused by a violation.”

According to the lawsuit, AB 2571 “violates rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments,” “well-established free speech precedents of the U.S. Supreme Court,” and, “it also violates their right to equal protection under the law.”

“This new law impacts Associations, Camps, Clubs, FFLs, Hunter Education, Instructors, Firearms Trainers, Youth Organizations, ranges, and those who work in association with any youth shooting program — including firearm safety training. Any promotion of firearms to those under 18 years of age may lead to hefty fines of $25,000 per incident,” the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CPRA) said in a statement Friday.

“This law is a clear First Amendment violation of speech and assembly. It’s really an attempt to wipe out the next generation of hunters and shooters,” said CRPA President and General Counsel Chuck Michel. “Politicians in Sacramento are not even trying to hide their disdain for the ‘gun culture,’ which they neither understand nor support. They want to wipe it out.”

The plaintiffs note in the lawsuit that “An offer to sell firearms or ammunition” is constitutionally protected commercial speech.

Yet the bill authorizes two types of civil actions to enforce compliance with its provisions, bill analysis explains. “First, the Attorney General or any district attorney, county counsel, or city attorney would be authorized to bring a civil action in any court, to seek a civil penalty.”

This bill focuses on advertising and marketing materials that are promulgated by a narrowly defined group of commercial speakers – the firearm industry – rather than on publishers, or even advertisers, in general, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit also says “unequal treatment occurs in the context of exercising a fundamental right, or the government is motivated by animus toward a disfavored group,” and warns current California law purports to otherwise prohibit minors from possessing handguns and semiautomatic centerfire rifles (and beginning July 1, 2023, any type of firearm).

“But the exceptions to these restrictions are numerous and non-exhaustive. Common to all of the exceptions is that the minor be engaged in, or be in direct transit to or from, “a lawful, recreational sport” which includes, “but is not limited to, competitive shooting, or agricultural, ranching, or hunting activity or hunting education, or a motion picture, television, or video production, or entertainment or theatrical event, the nature of which involves the use of a firearm.”

The lawsuit says AB 2571 only applies to marketing guns to minors, but does not apply to book, movie, television, and video game industries from “advertising, marketing, or arranging for the placement of an advertising or marketing communication concerning any firearm-related product” – Just to marketing to minors under the age of 18, and “to (politically unpopular) organizations formed to promote and preserve the Second Amendment rights. ”

“With the Supreme Court affirming that the Second Amendment has teeth and prohibits government infringement, now is the time for a long overdue SECOND AMENDMENT RECKONING,” the CRPA said. “Gun owners must support litigation efforts and groups like CRPA, GOC, and SAF that fight for your rights, and have been for decades. There are LOTS of lawsuits to be filed as we fight back against the BLUE RESISTANCE to the Second Amendment.”

Democrats want to be able to tell Americans that you can’t defend yourself with a firearm, and attempt to put this into action in legislation nibbling around the edges of the 2nd Amendment, restricting gun ownership rights. Fortunately, they were recently rebuked by the highest court in the land.

The Supreme Court in June issued a decision striking down a New York gun law that puts unconstitutional restrictions on concealed carry of a gun out in public. Gun carry permit applicants were required to provide justification or “proper cause,” for why they had to defend themselves, rather than just general self defense.

The Globe will follow this lawsuit closely and report any updates.

CRPA gun Complaint
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

9 thoughts on “Pro 2A Groups File Lawsuit to Stop Gov. Newsom’s Attempt to Destroy Youth Shooting Sports

  1. Always happy to see lawsuits filed in the wake of completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL “laws” like this, another genius move from the gang-of-clowns Dem legislature and Gruesome himself. Break a leg, plaintiffs!

  2. “The lawsuit says AB 2571 only applies to marketing guns to minors, but does not apply to book, movie, television, and video game industries from “advertising, marketing, or arranging for the placement of an advertising or marketing communication concerning any firearm-related product” –…”

    Yep… Why don’t our brain-dead legislators investigate the numerous studies that have been performed on the videogame industry, which has provided two generations of (usually) young men’s BABYSITTING SERVICES regarding first-person shooter video games, de-sensitizing them to the REAL violence that occurs when shooting another living being….

    We are now reaping what we’ve sown, when frustrated young men lash out at a society they perceive as unfair, and purchase, steal or are given real firearms and we have July 4th sniper attacks, school shootings in Uvalde, etc…

    There is a reason the US military now incorporates similar technologies in basic training…

    Think about it….

    1. “Yep… Why don’t our brain-dead legislators investigate the numerous studies that have been performed on the videogame industry, which has provided two generations of (usually) young men’s BABYSITTING SERVICES regarding first-person shooter video games, de-sensitizing them to the REAL violence that occurs when shooting another living being….”

      Not sure about the video games, CriticalDfence9. I don’t think that a cause-and-effect link to gun violence has been proven.

  3. Why does Gavin trust his armed guards to have guns around his wife and children?
    Because, somehow Californians get to pay for agents to protect them?
    SURE, the way Bonta protected the private information of legal gun owners?

    1. Good questions, Mary —– especially the first one. Yeah, what say you, Mr. Gun Hater? You should not want those things around the wife and kids. Right?

  4. I would hope that Katy might put this question to the Governor.
    She is great,
    She does not accept ‘no’ for an answer from Newsom and his Minions.

  5. This is what the office of the Assemblywoman Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda), and sponsored by Governor Gavin Newsom the bill responded back in an email …
    See Below !
    ___________________________________________________
    Cachola Lucey, Marilyn
    Hello Jay,

    I looked into this more and consulted with our senior caseworker. Since the National Skeet Shooting Association is a private entity, not a public one, their decisions do not fall under our purview. You can express your concerns about how NSSA is interpreting the law directly to NSSA. The NSSA may contact their own state attorney general or California’s Attorney General, if they wish to pursue additional guidance.

    AB 2571 is now law, which makes the appropriate venue to voice your concerns about its enforcement the California Department of Justice. You may do so by calling their Public Inquiry Unit at (916) 210-6276 or the toll free number in California (800) 952-5225. Their fax number is (916) 323-5341.

    In addition, since you reside in Rancho Cucamonga, your feedback is most appropriate for Assemblymember Ramos, your representative. His district office is located at 10350 Commerce Center Drive, Suite A-200, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Their number is (909) 476-5023.

    Thank you for contacting our office and giving us the opportunity to assist you in identifying appropriate offices to hear your concerns.

    Best regards,

    Marilyn Cachola Lucey, M.A., Deputy District Director (pronouns: she/her/hers)

    California State Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (AD-16)

    Please note new District Office address and phone number:

    12677 Alcosta Boulevard, Suite 395, San Ramon, CA 94583
    (925) 244-1600 FAX: (925) 244-1606

    Email: marilyn.cachola.lucey@asm.ca.gov| Website: http://a16.asmdc.org

    Facebook: RBKcalifornia | Twitter: @BauerKahan

    cid:image003.png@01D573C3.1CB30950

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.