Home>Articles>Bill to Create New Reparations Agency Passes Senate In Divisive Vote

Senator Steven Bradford. (Photo: Kevin Sanders for California Globe)

Bill to Create New Reparations Agency Passes Senate In Divisive Vote

‘They’re setting up these agencies and frameworks to dispense reparations without actually passing any reparations’

By Evan Symon, May 22, 2024 4:36 pm

A bill to create a new state agency, the California American Freedman Affairs Agency, to assist Californians with any approved reparations programs, passed in the Senate on Tuesday in a split 30-7 vote, with 3 abstentions.

Senate Bill 1403, authored by Senator Steven Bradford (D-Gardena), would specifically establish the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency in state government, under the control of the secretary, who would be appointed by the Governor. SB 1403 would require the agency to implement the recommendations of the Task Force, as well as require the agency to determine how an individual’s status as a descendant would be confirmed. The bill would also require proof of an individual’s descendant status to be a qualifying criteria for benefits authorized by the state for descendants. To accomplish these goals, the bill would require the agency to be comprised of a Genealogy Office and an Office of Legal Affairs.

SB 1403 would further require the agency to oversee and monitor existing state agencies and departments tasked with engaging in direct implementation of the policies that fall within the scope of the existing state agencies and departments’ authority, including policies related to reparations.

As the state is currently in a $73 billion budget deficit, and any cash reparations have been heavily opposed by Californians, Lawmakers, and even the Governor, the 14 reparations bills released this year have almost all been zero or low cost. Some of the bills quickly moved up. This included AB 1986, a zero cost bill that would eliminate the CDCR practice of banning books without oversight and review, and AB 1815,  a zero-cost bill that would prohibit discrimination based on natural and protective hairstyles in all competitive sports. Both bills passed the Assembly in recent weeks and are now headed to Senate committees. The same went for AB 3089, a bill that would have the state issue a formal apology for slavery. The bill passed the Assembly last week, with the cost of the bill likely to come down to how much creating a plaque for the Capitol Building is.

Other bills, however, have not been as lucky.  Two bills authored by Senator Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) were held back in the Senate last Thursday due to their costly nature. One, SB 1013, would give major financial property tax assistance solely for black descendants of slaves. The other, SB 1007, would give housing grants for the same group in formerly redlined areas. Both of the bills were subsequently killed by the Senate Appropriations Committee.

However, on Tuesday, there was a major exception to high cost/no passage trend: SB 1403. Earlier this year, the Senate Appropriations Committee estimated that the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency would cost around $1 million a year to operate, with high additional costs in having the state investigate land claims by black residents over whether or not land was lawfully taken from them or not.

Despite this, the bill has moved forward. Every committee vote so far has had the bill be vehemently contested, with multiple votes coming against it. Supporters have tried to justify the cost as needed to help coordinate all passed reparations bills based off of Task Force recommendations, including investigating. This cost justification won over 3/4ths of the Senate on Tuesday, with the bill passing 30-7, with 3 abstentions.

Thanks to the NAACP for championing SB 1403 and other critical bills at the CA State Capitol,” said Task Force Chairwoman Kamilah Moore on X on Tuesday. “It’s inspiring to see young advocates push for the Freedmen Affairs Agency, an initiative I proposed on the CA Reparations Task Force. Your efforts are shaping the future!”

While the bill did receive praise for passing, many lawmakers and those opposing such high-cost bills during a time of financial strain denounced the bill moving forward. Many also pointed out that all other reparations bills being moved forward have no monetary reparations, making such an Agency useless or having little to do.

“It seems to me like they’re putting, number one, the cart before the horse,” Assemblyman Bill Essayli (R-Corona) on Wednesday. “They’re setting up these agencies and frameworks to dispense reparations without actually passing any reparations.”

Katherine Douglas, a Washington-based analyst who focuses on state reparation efforts, told the Globe on Wednesday that “Essayli is right on the money about this. They’re trying to set up the Bureau for payouts and investigations, and other related tasks, but pretty much anything relating to money or property has been held up. They can maybe oversee some of the other bills that have been moved forward if they have been passed, but you don’t need a ton of people for that. A whole new Agency, we’re talking about staff, office costs, and other expenses that, yeah, sound like $1 million at least. If it is more than a skeleton staff though, that can go way up.”

“If this bill passes, they will use it to signal that more is coming. But as we’ve seen, the original 14 bills have dropped significantly so far. This is a costly bill, but it is being sold as a ‘first step’ bill for other reparations bills in the future. Every Californian should be watching this closely.”

SB 1403 is to be heard next in Assembly committees.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Evan Symon
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

7 thoughts on “Bill to Create New Reparations Agency Passes Senate In Divisive Vote

  1. adding an Agency – means IT, HR, etc multiple employees will be added expenditures (salary, pension, health benefits) for squabbling over payouts to divide the nation further in a state that was not responsible for anything this is about.

    The party most responsible is the DEMOCRAT party they are the ones who is in the center of 1860s and the three K’s even Jim Crow laws were rooted deep in Democrat party – they even filibustered Republicans during civil rights they did not want it until they figured out how they can “market” it

    What CA does NOT need is more GOV’T employees

    1. You said it, Orwellianism. And we also don’t need more cynical vote-buying nonsense, which if you’ve noticed, has really been ramping up lately; e.g., more student loans “forgiven.” But the Dems are obviously DESPERATE and this is what they do when they are desperate. So productive and helpful for our state and our country! Not

  2. It’s ironic that Democrat Senator Steven Bradford and California’s Democrat super-majority Legislature are pushing reparations when it was Democrats who instituted slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws and the KKK? Maybe Democrat Senator Steven Bradford and other legislative Democrats need to apologize and pay reparations for the sins of their Democrat predecessors?

    It’s laughable that Senator Steven Bradford would try to demand reparations when he grew up in a middle class family in Gardena and has led a successful life. Following high school, he attended San Diego State University and California State University, Dominguez Hills, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in political science and certificate in paralegal studies. Bradford was the first African American elected to the Gardena City Council, a post he held for over 12 years and he served one year as Mayor Pro Tem of the city. He also worked twelve years as a public affairs executive at Southern California Edison, seven years at IBM, and four years as a program director at the Los Angeles Conservation Corps.

    It’s curious as to why Democrat Senator Steven Bradford is pushing for reparations when the 35th senatorial district that he represents is overwhelming Latino/Hispanic at almost 55%? Do the majority of his constituents want reparations? Probably not? Hmmm, maybe he was installed into office with Democrat voter fraud and rigged voting machines?

    (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_35th_senatorial_district)

  3. I share the opinions stated above. If these Democrats want to give reparations they should be the ones paying for them. The Democrat party is the party of racism, slavery, the KKK, segregation, and voter suppression of black people. It has had notable racists in it’s ranks like George Wallace, Robert Byrd (US Senator and KKK member), Hillary Clinton, and former Vice President Joe Biden. Those people have racist views and have said many racist things. I as a taxpayer should not have to foot the bill for reparations. Hell, my ancestors were still in Europe until a little over a hundred years ago.

    1. John, I would be willing to provide reparations directly to any slave I personally owned. Beyond that nobody else gets squat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *