Kamala ‘For the People’ is Really Kamala ‘In Contempt of the People’
Harris was against the border wall until she was for it
By Katy Grimes, August 28, 2024 6:05 pm
Kamala Harris did not receive one vote before she dropped out of the 2020 Presidential Race. So it is mendacious of her to claim she accepted the nomination for President in 2024 “for the People.”
“For the people” indicates “because of the people.” Kamala Harris operates “in contempt of the people.”
What people is she talking about?
“As a prosecutor, when I had a case, I charged it not in the name of the victim. But in the name of ‘the People,'” she said in her DNC acceptance speech. “Every day in the courtroom, I stood proudly before a judge and said five words: ‘Kamala Harris, for the People.’”
“And I want you to know: I promise to be a president for all Americans.”
Not really. She can’t be “a president for all Americans” because no one voted for her in the Primary.
And because the Kamala Harris being presented as the Democrats’ presidential candidate doesn’t really exist.
Kamala Harris is using campaign staff to announce her flip flopping policies she now finds inconvenient. These are positions she’s had for years, in multiple elected positions. However, she won’t speak to “the People” herself to explain why she’s flip flopping.
In order to understand what Kamala really stands for, we need to go over policy positions she has supported:
Kamala Harris supports implementing an electric vehicle mandate, even though “the People” don’t want electric cars – they are expensive, unreliable, there is the $$battery$$ replacement issue and battery disposal issue, many have range issues, and “the People” don’t like mandates.
Harris said she supported a ban on gas-powered cars by 2045 when she ran for President in 2020.
But wait! Now, Harris doesn’t want to ban non-electric cars a campaign spokeswoman recently said. What about all of the legislation Harris supported while in the U.S. Senate to copy California’s law to ban electric cars by 2035?
Kamala Harris supports a fracking ban – “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking,” she said in 2019 at CNN’s town hall on the climate crisis. Harris sued to stop fracking on the California coast when she was State Attorney General. As a Senate candidate in 2016, she said she was skeptical of fracking, CNN reported. As a 2020 presidential candidate, during a debate Harris said she’d ban fracking.
“The People” support fracking for natural gas, which not so long ago, was touted by the left as “clean” natural gas.
Notably, as Vice President, Harris was chauffeured everywhere in a long caravan of black SUVs while declaring that the threat of climate change has reached “code red for humanity.”
Also in 2020, at the CNN climate debate, then-Sen. Kamala Harris said she was so desperate to pass a Green New Deal, she would slash the filibuster in the U.S. Senate. She also pledged to sue oil companies, PJ media reported.
The one policy Harris has proposed is a “wealth tax” on unrealized capital gains – assets that haven’t been sold. “This means that taxes may be paid on value that is never received by the owner, ultimately disincentivizing long-term investments by wealthy households,” Yahoo Finance reports.
For years, Harris has openly slammed Donald Trump for his “vanity” border wall.
“The People” want a border wall. Trump’s border wall was wildly popular when he was President.
Now “Harris is subtly co-opting his message to sell herself as a border hawk,” the New York Post reported. “At her DNC speech, Harris pledged to bring back the border security bill killed in the Senate last year, which pledges hundreds of millions of dollars to expand the border wall, and sign it into law if elected.”
“And she used photos of already-built sections of the wall in an ad touting her record as a ‘border-state prosecutor.”
“Harris hated the wall until about five seconds ago; in 2017, she called it a ‘stupid use of money’ and vowed to ‘block any funding for it.’”
Harris was against the border wall until she was for it.
“The People” she claims to represent and care for want a border wall and they want the Biden-Harris border invasion of illegal aliens to stop.
Harris not so subtly stole Trump’s “no taxes on tips” promise that he first proposed in June.
She’s also stole the Trump/Vance policy of a $6,000 child tax credit.
It is evident that Kamala Harris would rather steal the popular policies of Donald Trump and J.D. Vance in a weak attempt to appeal to voters – “for the people” she refuses to listen to.
As the New York Post said, “Harris’ plan for winning in November sure seems to involve going MAGA” as their cover art depicts.
- California Exodus: Golden State Tops US Moving Migration Report - December 10, 2024
- Sacramento County Coroner Releases Devastating Listing of Homeless Deaths - December 9, 2024
- The Gravitas of Actual Virtue versus Gavin Newsom’s Virtue Signaling - December 9, 2024
Didn’t Obama do this? Lied through his teeth about certain issues while winking at his base. They knew he was lying all along. They knew he didn’t believe any of it and would revert to the Marxist crap soon enough and they were okay with that.
Unfortunately for Klueless Kamala she had the opposite views in the way-too-recent past so she only ends up looking more foolish than ever, which is really saying something. Besides, as much as I loathe Obama, she’s no Obama. Dem voters are more than likely ALSO fed up and suffering as a result of the out-of-control border, skyrocketing crime, EV mandates, unaffordable food and energy costs and unmanageable inflation in general, and all the rest of it, don’t you think? Kamala’s adoption of the Trumpian agenda, which she clearly thought she NEEDED to do, only makes Dem voters realize how much they, too, would like these improvements, and if the stuff originally came from Trump, maybe they made a mistake in hating Trump with the white-hot passion that had been programmed into them.
Kamala should therefore be careful with this silly nonsense she’s pulling, because her supporters’ hatred of Trump is probably the ONLY thing that might make them vote for her instead of him.
Kamala’s plan to switch positions on major issues and steal the other candidate’s ideas is not going to work. There are already problems. While JD Vance crisscrosses the contested states attacking Harris, Walz remains muted. Why? According to the campaign, it’s because “he is not familiar with her position on major issues.” That’s because they change every day. Look at the upcoming interview. They must do it together and are afraid to do it alone. Their house of cards will all come tumbling down soon.
Wait until the debate. Her performance will sink her candidacy. The puppet masters in the Democratic party are not choosing candidates based upon their strengths but based upon their ability to be controlled. Look at Biden, Harris and Walz. Between the 3 of them none of them are strong leaders that can stand on their own merits. After the debate the establishment is going to be in a deeper panic than they already are they are. They will get rid of Kamala and push to force Joe out of office (Kamala was Joe’s pick as a way of gumming up the works for the establishment) at that point in time chaos will be running rampant and there will be one uncontrollable crisis after another. The establishment believes that they can’t afford to lose this election to Trump as he will destroy their agenda and their power. At this point in time, they are destroying themselves trying to stop Trump. This is where I believe that Newsom gets caught up in the mess. He is firmly entrenched in the establishment and is going to be implicated, and his illegal activities will be fully exposed, and he will be held accountable for them. It’s time to hold on the disinfectant of truth is coming.
Hal-I’m all for justice but I don’t think it’s coming anytime soon. There will be too much resistance unless there is a landslide Trump victory (which cheating makes impossible). I mean, look what happened to Strozak-he gets fired but his pension is intact and they just gave him $2 million for “breaching his privacy.”
I’d settle for a Trump victory, restoring peace in the world, closing the border and fixing the broken economy.
I agree. Her days are numbered. The leftist media has gotten the word to torpedo her. The only question is who they replace her with. My guess is Shrillary.