The Permanent Betrayal: Unelected Officials Weaponized Federal Power Against a President
Will anyone will ever be held accountable for it?
By Jay Rogers, March 23, 2026 11:30 am

Democratic accountability rests on a simple premise: when voters elect a president, the permanent bureaucracy implements that mandate – it does not obstruct it. What the evidence of the past decade reveals is not a conspiracy theory, it’s a documented record, with names, dates, and inspector general reports. The question is not whether the federal government was weaponized against a sitting president, but will anyone will ever be held accountable for it.
The Setup
The playbook was established in the final months of the Obama administration. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper personally briefed President-elect Trump on the Steele dossier, unverified opposition research funded by the Clinton Campaign and the DNC. His CNN colleague Jake Tapper then reported on the dossier’s existence, giving it its first mainstream airing. Brief, then leak: a clean sequence that provided plausible deniability while introducing damaging material at the most sensitive political moment imaginable. FBI Director James Comey compounded this by concealing from Trump that he was not a personal target of the Russia probe, then leaking his own memos of their private conversations through a Columbia Law professor to the press. Most telling: Senate Judiciary Committee transcripts show Comey drafted his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in April or May 2016, well before the FBI had interviewed her or seventeen other key witnesses. Conclusion first, fact-gathering second.
Crossfire Hurricane
Operation Crossfire Hurricane, launched in late July 2016, gave institutional structure to these individual decisions. Inspector General Horowitz’s 2019 report identified seventeen significant inaccuracies and omissions in the FISA applications used to surveil Carter Page, errors that consistently inflated the case for surveillance while omitting exculpatory evidence. Special Counsel Durham’s 2023 report went further, concluding that the FBI launched a full counterintelligence investigation on raw, unanalyzed, and uncorroborated intelligence, without interviewing witnesses, reviewing its own databases, or applying standard analytical tools – while simultaneously applying a far more deliberate standard when handling intelligence suggesting the Clinton campaign was constructing the Russia narrative as opposition strategy.
Resistance from Inside
Once Trump took office, the resistance institutionalized. National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was forced to resign after an FBI interview that agents’ own handwritten notes described as designed either to catch him in a lie or engineer his removal. In September 2018, DHS chief of staff Miles Taylor published an anonymous New York Times op-ed boasting that administration insiders were working to frustrate the president’s agenda. Taylor was later identified as the author, after denying it on live television, and became one of the first former Trump officials to endorse Biden. Trump was impeached twice, the only president in American history to face that distinction, with each proceeding consuming months of legal resources and presidential bandwidth that could have advanced governance instead.
The Surveillance Continued After He Left
The apparatus did not stand down when Trump left office. In February 2026, Reuters reported that the FBI had subpoenaed toll records for Kash Patel and Susie Wiles in 2022 and 2023, when both were private citizens. Those records were buried in FBI files labeled “prohibited” a classification designed, by Patel’s own account, to evade oversight. Corey Lewandowski and Dan Scavino received notifications in 2024 that Google had complied with FBI legal demands for their account data under court-authorized gag orders blocking disclosure for years. In 2023, the FBI recorded a confidential phone call between Wiles and her attorney without her knowledge. At least ten FBI employees connected to the investigation have since been removed.
The Accountability Gap
The public’s anger at this pattern is not irrational. It is the response of citizens who believe in equal justice when they observe that the same legal machinery capable of destroying a private citizen over a process dispute cannot seem to produce consequences for senior officials who abused surveillance authorities, concealed exculpatory evidence, and by their own written accounts worked to obstruct an elected president. James Comey was referred for prosecution by the Inspector General and never charged. No senior official responsible for the seventeen FISA errors has faced criminal sanction.
Genuine accountability requires specific actions: full declassification of FISA applications and Durham’s investigative files; a dedicated special counsel with no political dependency; civil liability for individuals who conducted improper surveillance; and statutory prohibitions – with mandatory criminal penalties – against the abuses documented here, including the burial of surveillance records in prohibited files and subpoenas targeting private citizens based on anticipated future government roles. The Deep State is not a myth. It’s a permanent class of non-elected officials who have concluded their institutional judgment outranks the electorate’s. Patterns have authors. Patterns, when fully exposed, can be disrupted. Our republic belongs to the people. The permanent bureaucracy needs to be made to understand that.
- Newsom’s Green Dreams Meet Reality - April 20, 2026
- The Inconvenient Truth About Fraud in Los Angeles - April 8, 2026
- DEFUND THE CHAOS: Congress Finally Pulls the Pin on Sanctuary City Funding - April 6, 2026





No.
No political figure of any serious rank ever gets punishment. The statute of limitations skillfully stops in time to protect the criminals, and cons the public while it makes lawyers rich.
Something has got to give.