Home>Articles>Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act May Have Some Benefits

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla. (Kevin Sanders for California Globe)
Articles Highlight Legislature

Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act May Have Some Benefits

Spotlight on Secretary of State Alex Padilla, foe of election-fraud probes

By Lloyd Billingsley, July 12, 2019 6:46 am

The “Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act,” by state Senator Mike McGuire, aims to force President Trump to release his tax returns as a condition of appearing on the ballot in 2020. Republicans argue that the measure is unconstitutional, but it could enlighten Californians to some lingering election issues.

As Bryan Anderson reports in the Sacramento Bee, the Act “would require Trump to file the last five years of his tax returns with the Secretary of State to get his name on the 2020 primary ballot. The information would then be published online, with contact information, Social Security numbers and medical information redacted from the public.” The record of California’s Secretary of State, Alex Padilla, raises questions about his suitability for the task.

After the 2016 election, Padilla refused to cooperate with a federal probe of election fraud. Padilla said in a statement he would  “not provide sensitive voter information to a commission that has already inaccurately passed judgment that millions of Californians voted illegally.”

Back in 2015, Padilla told the Los Angeles Times, “At the latest, for the 2018 election cycle, I expect millions of new voters on the rolls in the state of California,” with “new voters” code for ineligible voters. True to form, by March, 2018, more than one million “undocumented” immigrants received driver’s licenses from the state Department of Motor Vehicles, which automatically registered them to vote under the “Motor Voter” program. Padilla said the DMV kept “firewalls” in place but didn’t explain how they worked, or how many ineligible voters the firewalls had blocked.

Last September, the DMV sent out 23,000 “erroneous” voter registrations they blamed on “technical errors.” Padilla proclaimed himself “extremely disappointed and deeply frustrated” but legitimate voters could believe he was delighted. The odds are strong that illegals made up most if not all of the newly registered voters but Padilla wasn’t saying how many made it to the polls in November.

Apart from registering voters, which it was not created to do, the DMV has being doing a poor job at its regularly appointed tasks. Lines are long and mistakes are many, but legislators have barred independent state auditor Elaine Howle from conducting an investigation.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, just signed legislation spending $98 million on health care for people illegally present in the United States. Newsom responded to criticism from the president by saying he wants California to be “the most un-Trump” state in the nation.

On the other hand after recent earthquakes near Ridgecrest as one headline proclaimed, “After Earthquakes, California Governor Seeks Federal Aid.” The president told Gov. Newsom he would provide “whatever you need,” and the governor told reporters,  “we don’t agree on everything but one area where there’s no politics, and we worked extraordinarily well together, is on emergency response and recovery, and increasing that emergency preparedness.”

As economist Lawrence McQuillan noted in the Orange County Register, the Trump administration is easing regulations on forest thinning to prevent wildfires. Gov. Gavin Newsom “is quietly taking similar actions, an admission that environmental mandates are fueling catastrophic wildfires.”

Meanwhile, as California Globe’s Katy Grimes recently noted, “Constitutional integrity trumps what lawmakers want or wish. Gov. Jerry Brown had it right when he said, ‘I worry about the political perils of individual states seeking to regulate presidential elections in this manner. First, it may not be constitutional. Second, it sets a ‘slippery slope’ precedent. Today we require tax returns, but what would be next? “Five years of health records? A certified birth certificate? High school report cards? And will these requirements vary depending on which political party is in power?'”

Lloyd Billingsley

Lloyd Billingsley is the author of Sexual Terrorist, about the Golden State Killer, and A Shut and Open Case, about a California murder trial prolonged by Proposition 57 and recent legislation. Lloyd is a fellow with the Independent Institute and his work has appeared in the Daily Caller, City Journal, Orange County Register, Wall Street Journal and many other publications. Bill of Writes: Dispatches from the Political Correctness Battlefield is a collection of his journalism.
Spread the news:
RELATED ARTICLES
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles National Governor Legislature Congress
Sort by

Who is Presidential Candidate Tom Steyer?

California Campaign Operations Director Job Posting in Steyer Campaign
August 14, 2019 8:02 am

18

California Rep. Eric Swalwell is First Democrat to Drop Out of Presidential Race

Several national polls showed Swalwell at a stunning 0%
July 8, 2019 3:01 pm

18

CA Senate Passes Bill to Force Presidential Candidates to Release Tax Returns to be on State Ballot

Already vetoed by Gov. Brown, bill remains unconstitutional
May 6, 2019 11:56 am

18

One thought on “Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act May Have Some Benefits

  1. SB 27, the bill to require presidential primary candidates to reveal their tax returns, obviously violates the California Constitution. Article II, sec. 5(a), says the Secretary of State will put all “recognized” presidential candidates on a presidential primary ballot. Obviously President Trump is “recognized” as a presidential candidate. A state superior court ruled in 1992 that Lyndon LaRouche was recognized because he had been on the Democratic presidential primary ballot in 1988, and was on in multiple primary ballots in 1992, and had raised a fair amount of money. Trump is obviously more “recognized” than LaRouche was. Yet generally the big newspapers in California won’t mention the California Constitution in connection with SB 27.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *