Home>Articles>LA County Officially Returns Bruce’s Beach To Heirs 98 Years Later

Governor Newsom with Anthony Bruce on September 30, 2021 (Photo: gov.ca.gov)

LA County Officially Returns Bruce’s Beach To Heirs 98 Years Later

‘If the County really was being fair, they’d deed it to them no lease attached’

By Evan Symon, July 20, 2022 4:45 pm

In a ceremony in Manhattan Beach on Wednesday, Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan gave the official land transfer document of Bruce’s Beach to Anthony Bruce, a great-great-grandson of the original owners of the beach, officially ending the controversial takeaway of the land nearly a century ago.

The fight over ownership of the Beach dates back to 1912, when the African American Bruce family bought the beachfront property in Manhattan Beach, creating a resort that catered to black residents. Because most beaches at the time were unwelcome to black beachgoers, Bruce’s Beach quickly grew in popularity. However, for the next 12 years, many groups, including the KKK, continually threatened them, leading the Manhattan Beach City Council to take the beach by eminent domain in 1924.

Throughout the decades, control of the beach went between the city the state and the county before finalizing control by LA County in 1995, where it became the home of the Los Angeles County Lifeguard Training Headquarters. However, all of those years of transfers led to increased difficulty in legally transferring the property, with the 1995 transfer requiring that state legislation was needed to transfer the property once again.

In the early 2020’s, following the George Floyd incident and more calls for racial justice, Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn announced her intention of returning the beach back to the Bruce family, getting the support of Senator Bradford to introduce it in the Senate in 2021. Both houses in the California legislature approved of SB 796, which allowed the beach to be excluded from public use and let the LA County Board of Supervisors deal with it, with a strong suggestion that it was to be returned to the Bruce family. After Gov. Newsom signed the bill last September, one more major hurdle remained – County approval.

After the County agreed to lease the beach for $413,000 a year for the next 24 months, with the option to buy the land at a later date for $20 million, the LA County Board of Supervisors approved of the transfer in a final vote on June 29th. That led to the ceremony on Wednesday.

Bruce’s Beach returned

“It is my honor to be here and present a certified copy to the family,” said County registrar-recorder Logan on Wednesday.

In return, Anthony Bruce said, “Thank you so much. Without God, we would not be here today. And finally, most importantly, thank you all. God bless.”

After the ceremony, Supervisor Hahn explained that such a handover of land over an issue such of this had never really been done before, with the move being unprecedented.

“We can’t change the past and we will never be able to make up for the injustice that was done to Willa and Charles Bruce a century ago, but this is a start,” explained Hahn. “They told me nothing like this had ever been done before. Such a move is now no longer unprecedented.”

Many land and real estate experts noted that the Bruce’s Beach case now would likely be used as precedent for both similar eminent domain cases, as well as possible reparations cases in the future.

“There is precedent now for returning property after it was taken away in such a fashion by a city,” Roger Calhoun, a land buyer and seller in California, told the Globe on Wednesday. “And not only that. If California orders reparations to occur, and there are cases where there is land in question, there is now a case for people to point to.”

“But it is odd. In all honesty, land isn’t the issue here. Look at the terms of the lease. $400 grand a year for lease, in which the County will likely buy it back in two. It’s really giving money back to the family. The family can’t really rebuild the resort they had on there or anything. It’s basically paying them for the land they took back then in todays market terms. That’s all. If the County really was being fair, they’d deed it to them no lease attached. But it’s obvious that while they wanted to do the right thing, they didn’t want to let go of the beach. It’s just a roundabout way of saying ‘Here’s all that back money we should have paid you before’, but framed it around giving land back.”
The lease is due to end in two years. In 2024, LA County may choose to either buy the land back or lease again.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Evan Symon
Spread the news:


3 thoughts on “LA County Officially Returns Bruce’s Beach To Heirs 98 Years Later

  1. watch it become a hobo haven. watch the neighbors start to move out. so theyre giving it to a guy who is just related to the family and who has no real estate backround. he will sell it on the first offer,which will likely be the state or a foreign hedgefund.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *