Home>Articles>Preferred Pronouns and More: What I Saw at Teachers Union Convention

Kids in a classroom. (Photo: Shutterstock/Syda Productions)

Preferred Pronouns and More: What I Saw at Teachers Union Convention

Nearly half of the motions dealt with identity politics, social justice, and ways to promote the goals of the Democratic Party

By California Globe, July 25, 2022 2:30 am

By Brenda Lebsack

As a teacher, I attended the National Education Association convention last week, and my worst fears were confirmed.

Public schools are no longer a safe place for families who hold traditional values or for families who believe gender (as in male/female binary) is biologically determined.

It was also evident that the teachers union is a lobbying arm of the Democratic Party.

The NEA seems to think there are many gender options, and that’s why teachers and students must always address themselves with their “preferred” pronouns. It thinks this pronoun practice is essential and will create a more inclusive society.

That was demonstrated firsthand when each state delegate who spoke during the three-day convention July 4 to 6 was encouraged to state his or her name and “preferred” pronouns before addressing the assembly.

Pronouns I heard were he, she, they—and hex. One delegate even announced “they” had a uterus before addressing the assembly, apparently because that was something we all needed to know.

In the teachers union’s preamble, it says, “NEA is to be the national voice for education managed by and for the public good, to advance the cause for ALL individuals.”

However, as I read the 70 new business items and 40 amendments of bylaws, legislation, and resolutions, and listened to the platform speeches, it was obvious the NEA only represents those who hold the same ideologies and radical leftist political views.

From what I observed, the NEA’s goal is for public education to be a training ground for political activism, while demonizing anyone—including students and their families—who does not share those same political and sociological beliefs.

The NEA does not want public education to be neutral ground in developing critical thinkers with an emphasis on academic achievement.

Its priorities were apparent, because of the 110 motions discussed and voted on, only four remotely addressed student academic achievement. Those four dealt with student financial literacy and resources for English learners and language acquisition.

Nearly half of the motions dealt with identity politics, social justice, and ways to promote the goals of the Democratic Party.

Some examples: broad-brushing police as biased and corrupt; mocking the Second Amendment as a societal harm; fighting for preferential treatment for any and all groups considered “marginalized,” especially nonconforming genders and infinite sexual identities; fighting misinformation in the media (that is, any media outlets that do not agree with their views); increasing abortion rights; adding seats to the Supreme Court; and advocating for more queer representation on school boards.

Some other outlier items addressed environmental issues, hiring illegal immigrants as teachers, funding research concerning autism as it relates to gender identity, and funding global feeding programs.

Close to 40% of the motions were related to protecting teachers’ jobs and increasing their benefits and their right to be social justice cadres.

Although the NEA says it fights for nondiscrimination and civil rights, the only state delegates able to attend the Chicago event in person were those fully vaccinated. Any teachers who didn’t have vaccination cards could only attend virtually, regardless of whether they tested negative for COVID-19 or their reasons for not getting the shots.

The vaccinated delegates, who attended in person, had all expenses paid by their union local, while unvaccinated teachers were excluded and stigmatized as a “harm” to attendees. For a group that screams “My body, my choice,” the double standard is appalling.

On a positive note, the NEA voted down a new business item trying to mandate that all teachers in the nation be vaccinated. It lost, with 84% of the vote opposing.

Vice President Kamala Harris addressed the gathering on July 5 and repeatedly called Republican leaders in Washington “extremists.” The NEA’s executive director, Kim Anderson, said, “The Supreme Court has removed the right to marry someone of a different race.” (That’s flat-out false.)

She went on to say, “This Supreme Court and a significant number of radicalized elected officials have walked away from ‘freedom for all’ for an extreme discriminatory, exclusionary, misogynist, homophobic, out of touch, racist, cruel, corrupt ideology!”

I spoke up during a debate opposing a new business item to create a smear list of organizations seeking to “dismantle public education due to diminishing freedoms of sexual and gender identities and honest education” (a smokescreen for critical race theory).

This was my virtual statement:

I, Brenda Lebsack, oppose [new business item] 15. NEA says they strive for a safe school climate for all, yet forget that, according to the 2021 Pew Research, 56% of Americans believe gender is based on biological reality. NEA does not believe this. NEA believes that a child can choose their gender based on their feelings and that there are infinite options and pronouns. How can public schools be a safe place for all students, when NEA leaders demonize over half of the families represented in our public schools?

If NEA creates a fact sheet of the organizations “dismantling” public education, please include NEA on that list.

As founder of the Interfaith Statewide Coalition and a teacher in California, I can tell you that many orthodox Muslims, Jews, Catholics, and Christians no longer feel public schools are a safe place.

Your social justice goals to assault family cultures that do not match your own, and to use public education to propagate extremist views, is wrong.  This is an abuse of power. That’s why I, as a teacher, support parent rights and school choice.

I was tempted to state my “preferred” pronouns as “Com, U, and Nism,” but I resisted the urge to do so.

In conclusion, with respect to almost everything the NEA accuses others of doing, it is one of the biggest offenders.

America is in desperate need of educational reform because this powerful union, the National Education Association, has a delusional messiah complex and is using teachers and students as its political pawns.

Brenda Lebsack is a California teacher and former school board member who writes at “Brenda4Kids.”

This op ed originally appeared in The Daily Signal. Published with the permission of the author.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:


7 thoughts on “Preferred Pronouns and More: What I Saw at Teachers Union Convention

  1. The NEA like all labor unions (NEA being the largest) gets its power from members who pay dues. The NEA has a history of supporting only Democrat candidates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Education_Association). The NEA is currently the largest and most vocal proponent of the far-left progressive agenda of the Democrat party. Sadly, Brenda’s situation as an NEA member with conservative or even moderate social values, is comparable to being “a fish out of water.” Her only option is to find a different pond to swim in; or remain and be relegated to a career with little hope for leadership advancement. My suggestion is to find a teaching position in a non-union school or find a different occupation.

  2. Instead of teaching young people the necessary skills they will need as they become adults, our educational system has been hijacked by social justice warriors who pander to the alphabet soup of fringe gender dysphoriacs.

  3. The best way to starve this beast is to pull children from public schools and either homeschool, find & develop homeschool “pods” or do whatever we can to cut the head off this union snake, which relies on capitation for its funding…
    Not all teachers are on-board with this either, as a recent article in the Conejo Guardian revealed, but the Administrators appear to be towing this Union line….
    These organizations appear to be operating as a “fifth column” that is set up to destabilize the United States as we’ve known it, and infiltrate/indoctrinate the children’s minds with all sorts of agenda-driven policies and politics, in line with the old Communist way of thinking…
    All of this is reinforcing our decision not to have kids years ago was the right one… it was bad then, and it appears to be much WORSE now….

  4. Regarding preferred pronouns…


    Aug 13, 2019 Alternative for Germany (AfD) politician Steffen Königer arrived at the Brandenburg parliament to speak on a bill introduced by the Green Party which would “campaign for acceptance of gender and sexual diversity, self-determination, and against homo- and trans-phobia” in the city of Brandenburg. It would also “give equal rights and societal equality for LGBTTQQ [lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, trans, two-spirit, queer, questioning] people in Brandenburg.”

    “Dear Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen…” Königer said at the podium.

    However, it soon became obvious that his introduction was a little out of the ordinary.

    “Dear homosexuals, dear lesbians, dear androgynes, dear bi-genders…” he said, continuing with another minute of greetings, including to “trans-men…trans-women…and trans-humans.”

    One minute and 12 seconds after the start of his address, the parliament’s president asked if Königer “would allow an interposed question” – to which he promptly said “no.”

    “I’m not done with my introduction yet, Mr. President. Sorry,” Königer said, prompting laughter from the audience and even a city official sitting on the panel behind him.

    The AfD politician went on to speak for almost another minute, not forgetting to mention hermaphrodites and “two-spirit third genders.” He finally addressed the Green Party MPs behind the bill, and cheekily ‘respecting’ the gender with which they choose to identify by greeting all of them as “Mrs. or Mr.”

    After that, it took Königer eight more words to make his point: “The AfD party rejects your proposal. Thank you.”

  5. Thank you California Globe for reporting on the dysfunction of our political and education leaders here in California. You are pretty much the only one shedding light on this

  6. Sad state of affairs when the kids are an educational afterthought. Political indoctrination, yes, as that’s the priority. These radical organizations are sowing the seeds of the end of the public school concept.

    1. No one speaks of this but remember pre-integration , when the public schools were white, the teachers qualified and no one got shot while at school??? All the libs praised integration as it would raise the quality of education for blacks…..but, as predicted, instead it lowered the educational process DOWN to the level of the blacks. Gotta be equal. Public schools are useless and anyone that sends their kids to one are guilty of child abuse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *