Home>Articles>Blocking the Sun to Save the Planet? The Climate Cartel Has Officially Lost Its Mind

Oil Piers Beach. (Evan Symon for California Globe)

Blocking the Sun to Save the Planet? The Climate Cartel Has Officially Lost Its Mind

Trump is letting the sun get blocked — and you’re paying for it

By Maureen Steele, July 22, 2025 2:00 pm

While red states ban geoengineering, Trump’s federal agencies are still funding sun-blocking experiments that threaten our skies, our food, and our freedom.

Despite a second term filled with promises to drain the swamp and return power to the people, President Trump has allowed one of the most dangerous and unaccountable science experiments in human history to continue: solar geoengineering. Under his administration, federal agencies like NOAA are still actively funding research into stratospheric aerosol injection—essentially, spraying reflective particles into the sky to block sunlight in an effort to cool the planet. With an annual budget of over $11 million, the government is advancing these efforts under the guise of “climate management,” even as scientists and citizens across the country raise the alarm about unintended global consequences. The administration has made no move to shut the program down—instead, it has gutted environmental oversight bodies that might otherwise provide checks on these experiments.

Trump’s cabinet, led by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, has focused its regulatory muscle not on stopping this insanity but on cracking down selectively—like issuing cease-and-desist orders to private balloon operators like “Make Sunsets” while leaving federally sponsored experiments untouched. It’s a classic bait-and-switch: the administration gets to posture as anti-globalist and pro-sovereignty while continuing the very programs that threaten both. With states like Texas, Florida, and New Jersey passing laws to ban these atmospheric interventions entirely, Trump’s failure to take decisive federal action looks less like oversight and more like complicity. For a president who campaigned on exposing bad science and putting America first, continuing this sky-altering madness is not just disappointing—it’s dangerous.

There was a time when “climate change” meant what it sounds like—natural shifts in Earth’s weather patterns. The kind of change that’s been happening for millions of years. Ice ages, warming periods, solar flares, volcanoes—nothing new under the sun, if you’ll pardon the phrase. But today, “climate change” has become something else entirely. It’s not science anymore. It’s not even policy. It’s power. It’s control. It’s the excuse for a sweeping, global realignment of who gets to live freely and who doesn’t.

And now they want to block out the sun. Literally.

Wall Street and Silicon Valley are pouring millions into so-called “geoengineering” efforts to cool the Earth by reflecting sunlight back into space. Think I’m exaggerating? Read it for yourself in Politico. The Simons Foundation, the Pritzker Innovation Fund, and hedge-fund-backed Quadrature Climate Foundation are all in. So did the Biden White House, which publicly released its own research report on stratospheric aerosol injection—a fancy way of saying “spraying stuff into the sky to block sunlight.”

These are the same people who tell us to “trust the science,” while they literally want to dim the sky.

A test to brighten clouds over San Francisco Bay was shut down earlier this year by local officials after massive public backlash. That hasn’t stopped the funders from doubling down. They’re pushing for marine cloud brightening, solar radiation modification, and stratospheric chemical spraying—all in the name of preventing global warming. But let’s pause here for a second. Has anyone asked whether blocking sunlight is a good idea? Whether cooling the Earth artificially might, I don’t know, destroy agriculture, crash ecosystems, or permanently scramble weather patterns? Of course not. Because asking those questions makes you a “denier.”

It’s the same script we saw during COVID. Shut up. Sit down. We’re saving lives. Only now it’s “we’re saving the planet,” and if that means spraying the sky with reflective chemicals, so be it. The cure—again—is worse than the disease.

Just like the rest of their “green” agenda.

Solar panels are hailed as the savior of sustainable energy, but almost none of them are recyclable. They’re laced with cadmium, lead, and other toxic heavy metals. When they die—and most don’t last more than 20 years—they’re dumped into landfills, leaching poison into the earth. The International Renewable Energy Agency projects that by 2050, we’ll have more than 78 million tons of solar waste to deal with. MIT, Harvard, and IEEE have all acknowledged this solar waste crisis.

Then we have wind farms. Turbines are killing hundreds of thousands of birds and bats each year, including endangered species. Worse still are the offshore wind projects, like the ones off the coast of New Jersey and Massachusetts, which many believe are behind the unprecedented number of whale deaths on the East Coast. Local fishing industries, scallop beds, and fragile marine ecosystems are being annihilated in places like Nantucket. The NOAA’s own data shows this isn’t a conspiracy—it’s a catastrophe in progress.

Meanwhile, the same politicians who lecture you about emissions are flying private jets to climate conferences to demand you trade in your gas car for an electric vehicle. Let’s talk about that too. EV batteries are a dirty secret. Their production requires massive amounts of lithium, cobalt, and rare earth minerals. Most of that mining happens in countries like the Congo, where children dig by hand in toxic pits for pennies a day. The Amnesty International report on cobalt mining should be required reading for anyone who thinks electric cars are “clean.” And where does the electricity to charge them come from? Often, coal.

Under President Trump’s second term beginning January 2025, the federal government has not only maintained but aggressively streamlined support for solar geoengineering research—including stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and cloud-brightening studies—while slashing funding for regulatory science. NOAA, the principal agency overseeing the Earth’s Radiation Budget Initiative, continues to finance research into stratospheric particles at roughly $11 million annually, even as its broader climate research divisions face deep budget cuts and widespread staff and contract terminations under the new Department of Government Efficiency directives. Rather than banning geoengineering, the administration is consolidating it—prioritizing experiments to dim the sun while simultaneously dismantling oversight mechanisms and defunding agencies that might monitor or regulate such activities.

Federal geoengineering research under NOAA and related agencies continues untouched. In essence, the administration is removing the guardrails while still fueling the engine—allowing state-funded and academic-led experiments to advance unchecked, while focusing oversight resources narrowly on marginal private-sector actors. No federal ban exists. Instead, geoengineering is officially endorsed—but only if done under government control.

But don’t worry. The elites are covering their tracks with carbon offset schemes so fraudulent that even left-leaning media can’t defend them. The Guardian recently revealed that over 90 percent of rainforest carbon credits from the largest provider were “worthless.” Billionaires can keep polluting—as long as they “offset” their emissions by pretending to plant some trees in Brazil.

This isn’t environmentalism. This is a racket.

If any of this was really about saving the Earth, we’d be talking about suppressed and alternative energy sources. Nikola Tesla proposed tapping into the Earth’s natural electric field to generate unlimited, clean energy over a century ago. His Wardenclyffe Tower was defunded and dismantled when financier J.P. Morgan reportedly asked, “Where do we put the meter?” We’d be exploring the vacuum energy of zero-point fields. We’d be studying overunity and scalar energy systems. But every time humanity gets close to decentralizing energy, the patents get sealed, the labs get raided, or the inventors die mysteriously. See: Stanley Meyer, Eugene Mallove, and the long list of others.

The truth is, there is no climate emergency – only a crisis of power. The Earth has survived asteroid impacts, volcanic winters, and solar shifts. What it may not survive is another hundred years of weaponized science, corporatized environmentalism, and a public too hypnotized by slogans to question anything.

We are being told that the only way to save the Earth is to poison its soil, blind its skies, bankrupt its citizens, and enslave them to a digital carbon-credit caste system.

That’s not science. That’s tyranny with a green mask.

We don’t need to block the sun. We need to block the lies.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

10 thoughts on “Blocking the Sun to Save the Planet? The Climate Cartel Has Officially Lost Its Mind

  1. We need to have these projects DE-FUNDED and STOPPED immediately…

    This is “man” trying to play God and this NEVER works…. EVER…. (see mRNA injections)

  2. This in addition to bringing AI invasively and covertly into our lives, securing America’s third of three credit downgrades,  protecting pedofiles, initiating a war with Iran and fueling Zelinsky with arms as though WW III a priority.

    Looks like we’ve been played.

  3. Climate Change is the hill the environmental lobby is going to die on. They can’t really scale down to smaller conflicts and there’s no money to be made in chasing micro plastics.
    Even if a transition was necessary, it’s a financial and logistical “ bridge too far”. This junk endures because of a decades long propaganda campaign and the resulting Climate Religion so many still embrace.

  4. Two decades and trillions of dollars spent after Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” aroused the Left’s green climate hysteria, no measurable progress in controlling the weather has been achieved. The 2007 Supreme Court findings (Massachusetts vs. EPA) designating greenhouse gases as “air pollutants” should be revisited with the new sciences that upends climate fetishes and the global ecopolitical grifters in the enviro-industrial complex. Climate is controlled by H2O (clouds, water vapor) not CO2 or CH4. Climate Fetish

  5. Trying to blame Trump for the actions of rogue agencies and personnel is not going to fly.

    There is currently a war raging within these agencies for control. Deep state operatives are trying to do as much damage as they can before they are thrown out.

    Give it a little time and these actions will be reversed .

  6. I could believe this about Biden, and I don’t doubt there are some nutballs out there who would try to do it, but sorry, I don’t believe a single word of this article.

  7. This article raises some interesting points about the extremes we’re considering in the name of climate change. Blocking the sun? It seems like a science fiction plot rather than a practical solution. We need to focus on sustainable practices instead of quick fixes!

  8. This article raises some interesting points about climate interventions. While I understand the urgency of climate change, blocking the sun seems like a drastic measure that could have unforeseen consequences. We need to focus on sustainable solutions instead.

  9. This article raises some interesting points about climate policies and their impact on our daily lives. It’s crucial to find a balance between environmental action and practical solutions. What are your thoughts on the proposed measures?

  10. This article raises some interesting points about climate strategies. I wonder if there are any viable alternatives that could actually work without drastic measures like blocking the sun?

Leave a Reply to Paula Wolf-Kassulke Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *