CA GOP, Dem Lawmakers Slam Newsom’s EV Rebate Proposal Excluding Tesla
Governor’s office defends market-share cap, claims it would create EV competition
By Evan Symon, November 27, 2024 1:51 pm
Republican and Democratic lawmakers across the state continue to denounce Newsom’s proposed electric vehicle (EV) tax credit program on Wednesday, saying that the market-share cap provision would unfairly box out Tesla and other EV makers.
Governor Gavin Newsom announced on Monday that should President-elect Donald Trump keep his promise and remove the federal $7,500 zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) tax credit, he would help create a successor version of the state Clean Vehicle Rebate Project (CVRP) to make up for it. Initially, details were a bit scant. The Governor’s office didn’t delve into cost, who would be covered, how much the credits would be worth, or more technical details. They did say that it would include changes to promote innovation and competition in the ZEV market, and that funding could come from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by oil companies under the state cap-and-trade program.
However, throughout the day, more details emerged, showing that the rebates would not only cost taxpayers a lot based off the cost of the CVRP, but would likely include a market-share cap. This means that large EV makers, including Tesla, could be excluded from the plan. While the Governor’s office added that the proposal would come down to state legislature negotiations in Sacramento, Tesla CEO Elon Musk was furious. He responded late on Monday on X, saying that “Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane.”
On Tuesday and Wednesday, Musk was joined by not only outraged Californians hoping to use a rebate on an EV car of their choice, but many lawmakers across the state. This included Democratic lawmakers, who usually back Newsom on nearly every issue.
In a thread on X, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahon posted that “I Strongly disagree with excluding Tesla from the proposed program to support EV adoption in California—we want to encourage economies of scale to lower the cost of electric vehicles. Trying to punish Elon Musk by excluding the #1 best-selling EV, Tesla, from a program designed to support EV adoption has no economic rationale. The move is a political stunt.”
Congressman Ro Khanna (D-CA) also added that “Tesla makes over 550,000 vehicles in Fremont in my district & employs over 20,000. Let’s not play politics with keeping manufacturing in California. It would be foolish to exclude Tesla. Have we learned nothing from snubbing Elon Musk at the Biden EV summit?”
With Californians, Musk, and even lawmakers from his own party suddenly opposing his plan, Newsom’s office scrambled over the past few days to clarify his position, doubling down on saying that the market-share cap would be there to help all EV car makers and foster more EV competition in California,
“It’s about creating the market conditions for more of these car makers to take root,” explained the Governor’s office. “Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded. But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”
As Newsom is a major opponent of incoming President Donald Trump, and Musk being a critical ally of Trump, many have charged that this is more political than focused on EV growth.
“Governor Newsom is not really quelling any of the criticism,” added Veronica Deer, an auto industry analyst who focuses on the electric market, to the Globe on Wednesday. “If he really cared about getting more electric cars out there, it would be a cap free rebate and consumers could decide which ones they want. I’ve explained this to several people and the best response I got was actually from a former NFL player who owns a few dealerships. He said that “If this was a game, and the ref saw Newsom do that, he would get a yellow flag for targeting.”
“That’s how it looks to people, and you can understand the lawmaker response, especially those from San Jose and Fremont. Tesla still has a huge presence there, including their West Coast factory. Put politics aside for a second and realize that even though Musk moved the headquarters outside the state, Tesla still has numerous plants and factories in California, not to mention all those dealerships and other other ventures that employ tens of thousands of people and support millions of drivers.
“Newsom says he wants to, what ‘foster competition’?. Well, a lot of other companies offer EV cars and Tesla’s market share is going to naturally go down anyway. It actually is already in California. If Newsom keeps this up, you know who wins? Gas powered cars.”
More on the proposed rebates are expected soon.
- Farmers Insurance to Increase Number Of Homeowner & Renter Policies in California - December 12, 2024
- Gov. Newsom Announces April 29, 2025 Special Election Date for Two State Elections - December 12, 2024
- Safeway Announces Closure Of Fillmore District Store In SF Due To Safety Issues, Thefts - December 12, 2024
I love government “fostering” competition for consumer products. I don’t know if they are aware, but we didn’t hire them for that. Government is here to serve , not shape the electorate into some elite vision of what should be.
Newsom has begun his slow-motion descent into obscurity by doing what he believes his cronies want to see. EVs, Batteries, Windmills – all this expensive junk will be the downfall of the clowns that push it. Fun to watch them go.
Amen! He also hired a a full time photographer to take photos of him to the tune of $200,000.with tax payer dollars.
Heavy tariffs on BYD can’t come soon enough. What would be a nice add-on to those tariffs would be an IRS audit and a DOJ audit of any and all relationships between BYD and the CA governors office and CARB.
Amen!!! Newsom is a crook and very arrogant!
I find it funny you all are focused on competition, I’m focused on the rebate aspect.
Instead of $7.7k at the federal level (every American pays), now we bring that focus back on 40MM ppl – we all pay – there is no bank rolling this stupidity.
I will NEVER EVER buy an ev. Not until we have numerous SMRs(look it up).
Maybe the CCP are paying off Gavin “Hair-gel Hitler” Newsom to promote this hairbrained market-share cap scheme to “create more EV competition” while excluding large domestic EV automakers like Telsa? No doubt CCP connected EV manufacturers are planning to capture the EV market?
This is prima-facie evidence that Newsom is on the take/payroll of BYD a CCP-front company that builds EV’s and is the same company that our Narcissist-In-Chief-Governor wrote a no-bid contract for a billion dollars of PPE in the early days of their plandemic…>
By incorporating a market-cap payout, he’s guaranteeing a big payout from his Chinese paymasters….
EV’s are nothing more than vehicles powered by external combustion elsewhere, (ECE’s?) including the fossil fuel input manufacturing the solar panels. It is one big wealth transfer system with fossil fuels being today’s boogie man. Instead they just want to keep the combustion out of sight. In China. And blanketing rural farmland.
BTW, the road damage due to excessive weight is real. The Tesla Model Y is just over 4100 lbs. that is 1000 lbs per tire beating our third world off-freeway roads back into gravel. Other EV’s are close in weight. Newsom is not interested in presenting them the bill, pushing EV ownership closer to gasoline.
If there was ever an economy rigged against the best interests of consumers it is here in “Island California”.